Effect of water absorption ratio on tensile strength of red sandstone and morphological analysis of fracture surfaces

Min Wang , Ping Cao , Rui-chao Li , Xiang Fan

Journal of Central South University ›› 2017, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (7) : 1647 -1653.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2017, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (7) : 1647 -1653. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-017-3570-1
Article

Effect of water absorption ratio on tensile strength of red sandstone and morphological analysis of fracture surfaces

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Brazilian disc tests were undertaken on a number of red sandstone samples with different water absorption ratios. The tensile strength of the red sandstone decreases as the water absorption ratio increases. The fracture surfaces of failed red sandstone discs were scanned by Talysurf CLI 2000. With the aid of Talymap Gold software, based on ISO25178, a set of statistical parameters was obtained for the fracture surfaces. The maximum peak height (Sp), maximum pit height (Sv) and maximum height (Sz) of the fracture surfaces exhibited the same decreasing trend with increasing water absorption. Sa and Sku values for the fracture surfaces showed a downward trend as the water absorption ratio increased. The fractal dimensions of fracture surfaces were calculated and found to decrease as the water absorption ratio increased. Through analysis of PSD curves, the smallest dominant wavelength was observed to reflect the roughness of the fracture surfaces. Additionally, the results suggest that the roughness of fracture surfaces becomes small as the water absorption ratio increases.

Keywords

water absorption ratio / Brazilian disc test / fracture surface / morphological analysis / roughness

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Min Wang, Ping Cao, Rui-chao Li, Xiang Fan. Effect of water absorption ratio on tensile strength of red sandstone and morphological analysis of fracture surfaces. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(7): 1647-1653 DOI:10.1007/s11771-017-3570-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

JangH S, JangB A. New method for shear strength determination of unfilled, unweathered rock joint [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(4): 1515-1534

[2]

OgilvieS R, IsakovE, GloverP W J. Fluid flow through fractures in rocks II: a new matching model for rough rock fractures [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006, 241: 454-465

[3]

YangS Q, JingH W. Strength failure and crack coalescence behavior of brittle sandstone samples containing a single fissure under uniaxial compression [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2011, 168(2): 227-250

[4]

YangS Q, DaiY H, HanL J, JinZ Q. Experimental study on mechanical behavior of brittle marble samples containing different flaws under uniaxial compression [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(12): 1833-1845

[5]

Al-ShayeaN A. Crack propagation trajectories for rocks under mixed mode I-II fracture [J]. Engineering Geology, 2005, 81(1): 84-97

[6]

Freire-ListaD M, FortR, Varas-MurielM J. Freeze-Thaw fracturing in building granites [J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2015, 113: 40-51

[7]

KlawitterM, EsterleJ, CollinsS. A study of hardness and fracture propagation in coal [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 76(1): 237-242

[8]

LiangL X, XiongJ, LiuX J. Experimental study on crack propagation in shale formations considering hydration and wettability [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 23: 492-499

[9]

YuS, ZhuW S, YangW M, ZhangD F, MaQ S. Rock bridge fracture model and stability analysis of surrounding rock in underground cavern group [J]. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2015, 53(3): 481-495

[10]

BartonN, ChoubeyV. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice [J]. Rock Mech, 1977, 10: 1-54

[11]

TseR, CrudenD M. Estimating joint roughness coefficients [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci & Geomech Abstr, 1979, 16(5): 303-307

[12]

YuX, VayassdeB. Joint profiles and their roughness parameters [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci & Geomech Abstr, 1991, 28(4): 333-336

[13]

KulatilakeP, BalasingamP, ParkJ, MorganR. Natural rock joint roughness qualification through fractal techniques [J]. Geotech Geol Eng, 2006, 24: 1181-1201

[14]

KulatilakeP, UmJ. Requirements for accurate quantification of self-affine roughness-length method [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min, 1999, 36: 5-18

[15]

LeeY H, CarrJ R, BarsD J, HaasC J. The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci & Geomech Abstr, 1990, 27(6): 453-464

[16]

GrasselliG, WirthJ, EggerP. Quantitative threedimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci & Geomech Abstr, 2002, 39(6): 789-800

[17]

HirotakaS, GrasselliG. Geostatistical downscaling of fracture surface topography accounting for local roughness [J]. Acta Geotech, 2010, 5: 127-138

[18]

GiriA, TarafdarS, GouzeP, DuttaT. Fractal geometry of sedimentary rocks: simulation in 3-D using a relaxed bidisperse ballistic deposition model [J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2013, l192(3): 1059-1069

[19]

PiW L, DaiG F. Research on periodical damage of roof rock-mass and its fractal character [J]. Disaster Advances, 2010, 3(4): 459-461

[20]

XieH P, LiuJ F, JuY, LiJ, XieL Z. Fractal property of spatial distribution of acoustic emissions during the failure process of bedded rock salt [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2011, 48(8): 1344-1351

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

97

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/