Optimization on selenium and arsenic conversion from copper anode slime by low-temperature alkali fusion process

Abstract

A process was proposed to convert and separate selenium and arsenic in copper anode slime (CAS) by low-temperature alkali fusion process. Central composite design was employed to optimize the effective parameters, in which NaOH/CAS mass ratio, fusion temperature and fusion time were selected as variables, and the conversion ratio of selenium and arsenic as responses. Second-order polynomial models of high significance and 3D response surface plots were constructed to show the relationship between the responses and the variables. Optimum area of >90% selenium conversion ratio and >90% arsenic conversion ratio was obtained by the overlaid contours at NaOH/CAS mass ratio of 0.65-0.75, fusion temperature of 803-823 K and fusion time of 20-30 min. The models are validated by experiments in the optimum area, and the results demonstrate that these models are reliable and accurate in predicting the fusion process.

Keywords

optimization / low-temperature alkali fusion / copper anode slime / selenium / arsenic / central composite design

References

[1] HuangW-y, SuQ-ping. The situation and development of copper hydrometallurgy [J]. Anhui Chemical, 2011, 37(2): 13-14

[2] ChenG-b, YangH-y, GuoJ, LiX-jiao. The rougher flotation process of copper anode slime for collecting gold and silver [J]. Precious Metals, 2013, 34(3): 32-33

[3] LiX-j, YangH-y, TongL-l, ChenG-bao. Technological mineralogy of copper anode slime [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2013, 34(4): 560-561

[4] LiuW-fengStudy on copper/lead anode slimes treated by alkaline oxidative leaching [D], 2011, Changsha, Central South University: 120128

[5] GuoX-y, XiaoC-m, ZhongJ-y, TianQ-hua. Behaviors of precious metals in process of copper anode slime treatment [J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2010, 20(5): 990-998

[6] CooperW C. The treatment of copper refinery anode slimes [J]. JOM, 1990, 42(8): 45-49

[7] YasinK, GuldemK, ServetT. An investigation of copper and selenium recovery from copper anode slimes [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2013, 124: 75-82

[8] HoffmannJ E. Recovering selenium and tellurium from copper refinery slimes [J]. Journal of the Minerals Metals Materials Society, 1989, 41(7): 33-38

[9] SyedS. Recovery of gold from secondary sources—A review [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2012, 115: 30-51

[10] LiD, GuoX-y, XuZ-p, TianQ-h, FengQ-ming. Leaching behavior of metals from copper anode slime using an alkali fusion-leaching process [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2015, 157: 9-12

[11] LiuW-f, YangT-z, ZhangD-c, ChenL, LiuY-nian. Pretreatment of copper anode slime with alkaline pressure oxidative leaching [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2014, 128: 48-54

[12] LuD-k, ChangY-f, YangH-y, XieFeng. Sequential removal of selenium and tellurium from copper anode slime with high nickel content [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015, 25(4): 1307-1314

[13] TangM-t, TangC-b, ChenY-m, YangJ-g, YangS-h, HeJ, OuZhao. A promising low carbon clean metallurgical method: low-temperature molten salt metallurgy of heavy metal [J]. China Nonferrous Metallurgy, 2010, 4: 49-53

[14] HuY-j, TangC-b, TangM-t, YangJ-g, ChenY-m, YangS-h, HeJing. A clean and green process of low-temperature for smelting of secondary lead [J]. Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy), 2013, 8: 1-4

[15] GuoX-y, LiuJ-x, TianQ-hua. Elemental behavior of multi-component metal powders from waste printed circuit board during low-temperature alkaline smelting [J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2013, 23(6): 1757-1763

[16] LiuJ-x, GuoX-y, TianQ-h, LiDong. Separation and extraction of amphoteric metals from waste printed circuit board powders by low-temperature alkaline smelting [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2014, 36(7): 875-879

[17] PodstawczykD, Witek-KrowiakA, DawiecA, BhatnagarA. Biosorption of copper (II) ions by flax meal: Empirical modeling and process optimization by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) simulation [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 83: 364-379

[18] AkalinM K, TekinK, AkyuzM, KaragozS. Sage oil extraction and optimization by response surface methodology [J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2015, 76: 829-835

[19] BoxG E P, WilsonK B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, |Series^B (Methodological), 1951, 13(1): 1-45

[20] BoxG E P, HunterJ S. Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces [J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1957, 28(1): 195-241

[21] KhuriA I, MukhopadhyayS. Response surface methodology [J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2010, 2(2): 128-149

[22] ZhangX, WangR-j, YangX-x, YuJ-gang. Central composite experimental design applied to the catalytic aromatization of isophorone to 3, 5-xylenol [J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2007, 89(1): 45-47

[23] LinY C, TsaoC C, HsuC Y, HungS K, WenD C. Evaluation of the characteristics of the microelectrical discharge machining process using response surface methodology based on the central composite design [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 62(9-12): 1013-1014

[24] ObengD P, MorrelS, Napier-MunnT J. Application of central composite rotatable design to modelling the effect of some operating variables on the performance of the three-product cyclone [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2005, 76(3): 181-192