Dynamic responses of K-type and inverted-K-type jacket support structures for offshore wind-turbines

Ying-di Liao , Meng-yuan Guo , Na Wang , Li-jun Hou , Da Chen

Journal of Central South University ›› 2017, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4) : 947 -956.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2017, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4) : 947 -956. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-017-3497-6
Article

Dynamic responses of K-type and inverted-K-type jacket support structures for offshore wind-turbines

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The jacket structure has become more popular as the offshore wind-turbine support structure. K-type and inverted-K-type jacket support structures have superior potential due to their fewer joints and lower cost of manufacture and installation. A numerical study was presented on the dynamic responses of K-type and inverted-K-type jacket support structures subjected to different kinds of dynamic load. The results show that the inverted-K-type jacket structure has higher natural frequencies than the K-type. The wave force spectrum response shows that the maximum displacement of the K-type jacket structure is larger than that of the inverted-K-type. The time-history responses under wind and wave-current load indicate that the inverted-K-type jacket structure shows smaller displacement and stress compared with the K-type, and presents different stress concentration phenomena. The dynamic responses reveal that the inverted-K-type of jacket support structure has greater stiffness and superior mechanical properties, and thus is more applicable in the offshore area with relatively deep water.

Keywords

jacket support structure / K-type / inverted-K-type / foundation / dynamic responses

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ying-di Liao, Meng-yuan Guo, Na Wang, Li-jun Hou, Da Chen. Dynamic responses of K-type and inverted-K-type jacket support structures for offshore wind-turbines. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(4): 947-956 DOI:10.1007/s11771-017-3497-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

HendersonA R, MorganC, SmithB, SorensenH C, BarthelmieR J, BoesmansB. Offshore wind energy in Europe—A review of the state-of-the-art [J]. Wind Energy, 2003, 6(1): 35-52

[2]

ChenD, HuangK, BretelV, HouL-Jun. Comparison of structural properties between monopile and tripod offshore wind-turbine support structures [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 20131-9

[3]

SchaumannP, Lochte-HoltgrevenS, SteppelerS. Special fatigue aspects in support structures of offshore wind turbines [J]. Materials Science and Engineering Technology, 2011, 42(12): 1075-1081

[4]

ScharffR, SiemsM. Monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines-solutions for greater water depths [J]. Steel Construction, 2013, 6(1): 47-53

[5]

DNV-OS-J101. Design of offshore wind turbine structures [S].

[6]

LiW, ZhengY-m, LuF, LuoJ-p, JiangZ-q, HuanCai. Dynamic analysis of foundational structure for offshore wind turbine [J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 2012, 31(1): 67-73

[7]

NishijimaK, KandaJ, ChoiH. Estimation of peak factor for non-Gaussian wind pressure [J]. Journal of Structural Construction Engineering, 2002, 557(7): 79-84

[8]

IshikawaTA study on wind load estimation method considering dynamic effect for overhead transmission lines [D], 2004TokyoWaseda University

[9]

BinhL V, IshikawaT, PhucP V, FujinoY. A peak factor for non-Gaussian response analysis of wind turbine tower [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(1011): 2217-2227

[10]

LobitzD WA Nastran-based computer program for structural dynamic analysis of horizontal axis wind turbines [C]// Proceedings of the Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Technology Workshop, 1984385-393

[11]

OscarD S, PaezT LAnalysis of wind turbines on offshore support structures excited by random wind and random waves [R], 1988AlbuquerqueSandia National Laboratories

[12]

ChengP WA reliability based design methodology for extreme responses of offshore wind turbines [D], 2002Delft, NetherlandsDelft University

[13]

LiuZ-qiangDynamic responses analysis of wind turbine tower subjected to environmental load [D], 2009DalianDalian University of Technology

[14]

ChenX-b, LiJ, ChenJ-yun. Calculation of the nonlinear wave force of offshore wind turbine based on the stream function wave theory [J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2010, 38(3): 22-28

[15]

BazeosN, HatzigeorgiouG D, HondrosI D, KaramaneasH, KarabalisD L, BeskosD E. Static, seismic and stability analyses of a prototype wind turbine steel tower [J]. Engineering Structures, 2002, 24(8): 1015-1025

[16]

LavassasI, NikolaidisG, ZervasP, EfthimiouE, DoudoumisI N, BaniotopoulosC C. Analysis and design of the prototype of a steel 1-MW wind turbine tower [J]. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25(8): 1097-1106

[17]

NegmH M, MaalawiK Y. Structural design optimization of wind turbine towers [J]. Computers & Structures, 2000, 74(6): 649-666

[18]

YiW, SongY-p, ZhangY-kun. Style selection and optimum of offshore concrete platform [J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 1999, 21(3): 126-133

[19]

YuY-xiuRandom wave and its applications to engineering (the third edition) [M], 2003DalianDalian University of Technology Press356-359

[20]

LiC X, DuM, HanB K. Simulation of fluctuating wind speed time series of super-tall building based on AR model [J]. Journal of Earthquake and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 28(3): 87-92

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

165

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/