Rock strength interval analysis using theory of testing blind data and interval estimation

Sen Tian , Jian-hong Chen , Long-jun Dong

Journal of Central South University ›› 2017, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 168 -177.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2017, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 168 -177. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-017-3418-8
Article

Rock strength interval analysis using theory of testing blind data and interval estimation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The concepts of rock strength intervals are presented in this work, furthermore, central values of intervals and their corresponding credibility are provided using two-case study based on blind data theory and fuzzy interval estimation. 60 granite specimens are first tested, the compressive strength interval and tensile strength interval are [103.68, 219.61] and [7.53, 11.86] MPa, while the tested mean values of compressive strength and tensile strength are 152.86 and 10.14 MPa, the credibilities are less than 58.4% and around 70.4%, respectively, the credibility of shear strength is between 40% and 60%. Then 70 other rock specimens are designed and tested, the similar conclusions can be reached. The results show that the conventional definite values are the particular values within the intervals, and the credibility of them often fails to reach the high-precision engineering requirement. The results demonstrate the feasibility and application potential of this proposed algorithm for the engineering practice. The references for engineering value selection of rock strength under different credibility or according to frequency distribution of central values are provided to increase the reliability and precision of calculation.

Keywords

rock strength interval / uniaxial compressive strength / uniaxial tensile strength / shear strength / blind data / interval theory

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sen Tian, Jian-hong Chen, Long-jun Dong. Rock strength interval analysis using theory of testing blind data and interval estimation. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(1): 168-177 DOI:10.1007/s11771-017-3418-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ZouD H, ChengJ-l, YueR-j, SunX-yun. Grout quality and its impact on guided ultrasonic waves in grouted rock bolts [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2010, 72(2): 102-106

[2]

WangC, HeW, NingJ-g, ZhangC-suo. Propagation properties of guided wave in the anchorage structure of rock bolts [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2009, 69(34): 131-139

[3]

KhandelwalM, RanjithP G. Correlating index properties of rocks with P-wave measurements [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2010, 71(6): 1-5

[4]

ASTM.American Society for testing and materials. Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of intact rock core specimens [M]//, 1984

[5]

ASTM.. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens [C]// Annual Book of ASTM, Standards. Philadelphia: ASTM, 1984, 42: 336

[6]

ASTM.Standard test method for performing laboratory direct shear strength tests of rock specimens under constant normal force [M], 200812

[7]

ISRM.. Suggested method for determining point load strength [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech, 1985, 22(2): 51-60

[8]

ISRM.. Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech, 1978, 15(6): 99-103

[9]

ISRM.. The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring [J]. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 2009, 15(1): 47-48

[10]

ISRM.. Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 1979, 16(2): 135-140

[11]

SinghT N, KaintholaA, VenkateshA. Correlation between point load index and uniaxial compressive strength for different rock types [J]. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2012, 45(2): 259-264

[12]

MuralhaJ, GrasselliG, TatoneB, BlumelM, ChryssanthakisP, JiangY-jing. ISRM suggested method for laboratory determination of the shear strength of rock joints: Revised version [J]. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2014, 47(1): 291-302

[13]

ZhuZ-ming. Evaluation of the range of horizontal stresses in the earth's upper crust by using a collinear crack model [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2013, 88: 114-121

[14]

AlefeldG, MayerG. Interval analysis: Theory and applications [J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2000, 121(12): 421-464

[15]

BhattacharyyaR, KarS, MajumderD D. Fuzzy mean–variance–skewness portfolio selection models by interval analysis [J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2011, 61(2): 126-137

[16]

LagrangeS, DelanoueaN D, JaulinL. Injectivity analysis using interval analysis: Application to structural identifiability [J]. Automatica, 2008, 44(11): 2959-2962

[17]

FengX-d, JimenezR. Bayesian prediction of elastic modulus of intact rocks using their uniaxial compressive strength [J]. Engineering Geology, 2014, 173: 32-40

[18]

ErarslanN, LiangZ-z, WilliamsD J. Experimental and numerical studies on determination of indirect tensile strength of rocks [J]. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2012, 45(5): 739-751

[19]

ErarslanN, WilliamsD J. Investigating the effect of cyclic loading on the indirect tensile strength of rocks [J]. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2012, 45(3): 327-340

[20]

ClaessonaJ, BohlolibB. Brazilian test: Stress field and tensile strength of anisotropic rocks using an analytical solution [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(8): 991-1004

[21]

FahimifarA, MalekpourM. Experimental and numerical analysis of indirect and direct tensile strength using fracture mechanics concepts [J]. Bull Eng Geol Environ, 2012, 71(2): 269-283

[22]

CarmonaS, AguadoA. New model for the indirect determination of the tensile stress–strain curve of concrete by means of the Brazilian test [J]. Materials and Structures, 2012, 45(10): 1473-1485

[23]

AlonsoE E, PinyolN M, PinedaJ A. Foundation of a gravity dam on layered soft rock. Shear strength of bedding planes in laboratory and large “in situ” tests [C]//. 15th European Conf Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2010389-394

[24]

BarlaG, RobottiF, VaiL. Revisiting large size direct shear testing of rock mass foundations [C]//. 6th International Conference on Dam Engineering, 201115-17

[25]

WangX-j, WangL, QiuZ-ping. A feasible implementation procedure for interval analysis method from measurement data [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014, 38(910): 2377-2397

[26]

ChengH-z, ZhuH-f, CrowM L, ShebleG B. Flexible method for power network planning using the unascertained number [J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2004, 68(1): 41-46

[27]

QiuD, ZhangW-quan. Symmetric fuzzy numbers and additive equivalence of fuzzy numbers [J]. Soft Computing, 2013, 17(8): 1471-1477

[28]

GrzegorzewskiP. Fuzzy number approximation via shadowed sets [J]. Information Sciences, 2013, 225(10): 35-46

[29]

UlusayR, HudsonJ AThe complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring [M], 20071974-2006

[30]

HaimsonB, BobetA. Introduction to suggested methods for failure criteria [J]. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2012, 45(6): 973-974

[31]

AkbariaM G, RezaeibA. Bootstrap testing fuzzy hypotheses and observations on fuzzy statistic [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(8): 5782-5787

[32]

MaL-h, YanH-z, ZhangY-ni. Effectiveness evaluation of construction enterprise information systems planning based on unascertained number [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 15: 4745-4750

[33]

ZhouT, WangZ-h, YangR-chang. Study on model of onset of nucleate boiling in natural circulation with subcooled boiling using unascertained mathematics [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2005, 235(21): 2275-2280

[34]

AubryaC, DesmareaR, JaulinL. Loop detection of mobile robots using interval analysis [J]. Automatica, 2013, 49(2): 463-470

[35]

YangY-w, CaiZ-h, LiuYu. Interval analysis of dynamic response of structures using Laplace transform [J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29: 32-39

[36]

DasS K, BasudharP K. Comparison of intact rock failure criteria using various statistical Methods [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2009, 4(3): 223-231

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

121

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/