PDF
Abstract
Numerous innovative heat recovery-to-power technologies have been resourcefully and technologically exploited to bridge the growing gap between energy needs and its sustainable and affordable supply. Among them, the proposed trilateral-cycle (TLC) power system exhibits high thermodynamic efficiency during heat recovery-to-power from low-to-medium temperature heat sources. The TLCs are proposed and analysed using n-pentane as working fluid for waste heat recovery-to-power generation from low-grade heat source to evaluate the thermodynamic efficiency of the cycles. Four different single stage TLC configurations with distinct working principles are modelled thermodynamically using engineering equation solver. Based on the thermodynamic framework, thermodynamic performance simulation and efficiency analysis of the cycles as well as the exergy efficiencies of the heating and condensing processes are carried out and compared in their efficiency. The results show that the simple TLC, recuperated TLC, reheat TLC and regenerative TLC operating at subcritical conditions with cycle high temperature of 473 K can attain thermal efficiencies of 21.97%, 23.91%, 22.07% and 22.9%, respectively. The recuperated TLC attains the highest thermodynamic efficiency at the cycle high temperature because of its lowest exergy destruction rates in the heat exchanger and condenser. The efficiency analysis carried out would assist in guiding thermodynamic process development and thermal integration of the proposed cycles.
Keywords
trilateral cycle
/
waste heat recovery-to-power generation
/
thermodynamic performance simulation
/
efficiency analysis
/
process development and integration
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Habeeb A. Ajimotokan.
Efficiency analysis of trilateral-cycle power systems for waste heat recovery-to-power generation.
Journal of Central South University, 2017, 23(12): 3160-3170 DOI:10.1007/s11771-016-3382-8
| [1] |
AjimotokanH AA study of trilateral flash cycles for low-grade waste heat recovery-to-power generation [D], 2014CranfieldCranfield University
|
| [2] |
CostallA W, GonzalezH A, NewtonP J, MartinezbotasR F. Design methodology for radial turbo expanders in mobile organic Rankine cycle applications [J]. Appl Energy, 2015, 157: 729-743
|
| [3] |
DemirkayaG, VasquezP R, GoswamiD Y, StefanakosE, RahmanM M. Analysis of a combined power and cooling cycle for low-grade heat sources [J]. Int J Energy Res, 2011, 35: 1145-1157
|
| [4] |
SmithI K, StosicN, KovacevicA. Screw expanders increase output and decrease the cost of geothermal binary power plant systems [C]. Proc Geotherm Resour Counc Annu Meet. Nevada, 2005787-794
|
| [5] |
DaiY, WangJ, GaoL. Parametric optimization and comparative study of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat recovery [J]. Energy Convers Manag, 2009, 50: 576-582
|
| [6] |
SmithI K, StosicN, MujicE, KovacevicA. Steam as the working fluid for power recovery from exhaust gases by means of screw expanders [J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E: J Process Mech Eng, 2011, 225: 117-125
|
| [7] |
AjimotokanH A, SherI. Thermodynamic performance simulation and design optimisation of trilateral-cycle engines for waste heat recovery-to-power generation [J]. Appl Energy, 2015, 154: 26-34
|
| [8] |
ChenH, GoswamiD Y, RahmanM, StefanakosE K. A supercritical Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat into power [J]. Energy, 2011, 36: 549-555
|
| [9] |
FrancoA, CasarosaC. On some perspectives for increasing the efficiency of combined cycle power plants [J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2002, 22: 1501-1518
|
| [10] |
ChanC W, Ling-ChinJ, RoskillyA P. A review of chemical heat pumps, thermodynamic cycles and thermal energy storage technologies for low grade heat utilisation [J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2013, 50: 1257-1273
|
| [11] |
ZamfirescuC, DincerI. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel ammonia-water trilateral Rankine cycle [J]. Thermochim Acta, 2008, 477: 7-15
|
| [12] |
SmithI K, StosicN, KovacevicA. An improved system for power recovery from higher enthalpy liquid dominated fields [C]. Proc World Geotherm Congr. Antalya, 2005561-565
|
| [13] |
TchancheB F, PapadakisG, LambrinosG, FrangoudakisA. Fluid selection for a low-temperature solar organic Rankine cycle [J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2009, 29: 2468-2476
|
| [14] |
AjimotokanH A, SherI, BiliyokC, YeungH. Trilateral flash cycle for recovery of power from a finite low-grade heat source [J]. Comput Aided Process Eng, 2014, 33: 1831-1866
|
| [15] |
ZamfirescuC, DincerI. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel ammonia-water Rankine cycle [C]. Proc 2nd Int'l Conf Energy Sustain. Florida, 200951-59
|
| [16] |
ChenH, GoswamiD Y, StefanakosE K. A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat [J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2010, 14: 3059-3067
|
| [17] |
HungT C, WangS K, KuoC H, PeiB S, TsaiK F. A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an ORC using lowgrade energy sources [J]. Energy, 2010, 35: 1403-1411
|
| [18] |
AndersenW C, BrunoT J. Rapid screening of fluids for chemical stability in organic rankine cycle applications [J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2005, 44: 5560-5566
|
| [19] |
LiuB T, ChienK H, WangC C. Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery [J]. Energy, 2004, 29: 1207-1217
|
| [20] |
DesaiN B, BandyopadhyayS. Process integration of organic Rankine cycle [J]. 11th Conf Process Integr Model Optim Energy Sav Pollut Reduct, 2009, 34: 1674-1686
|
| [21] |
RayeganR, TaoY X. A procedure to select working fluids for solar Organic Rankine cycles [J]. Renew Energy, 2011, 36: 659-670
|
| [22] |
EbrahimM, KawariA. Pinch technology: An efficient tool for chemical-plant energy and capital-cost saving [J]. Appl Energy, 2000, 65: 45-49
|
| [23] |
OliveiraC M, CruzA J, CostaC B. Comparison among proposals for energy integration of processes for 1G/2G ethanol and bioelectricity production [J]. Comput Aided Chem Eng, 2014, 33: 1585-1590
|
| [24] |
SeiderW S, SeaderJ D, LewinD RProduct and process design principles: synthesis, analysis, and evaluation [M], 2004New YorkWiley and Sons Inc
|
| [25] |
BanerjeeA, TierneyM J, ThorpeR N. Thermoeconomics, cost benefit analysis, and a novel way of dealing with revenue generating dissipative units applied to candidate decentralised energy systems for Indian rural villages [J]. Energy, 2012, 43: 477-488
|
| [26] |
GassnerM, MaréchalF. Thermo-economic optimisation of the integration of electrolysis in synthetic natural gas production from wood [J]. Energy, 2008, 33: 189-198
|
| [27] |
QuoilinS, DeclayeS, TchancheB F, LemortV. Thermoeconomic optimization of waste heat recovery Organic Rankine Cycles [J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2011, 31: 2885-2893
|
| [28] |
DagdasA. Exergy analysis and pressure optimisation of geothermal binary power plants [J]. Int J Exergy, 2005, 2: 409-422
|
| [29] |
CihannA, HacihafizoğluO, KahveciK. Energy-exergy analysis and modernization suggestions for a combined-cycle power plant [J]. Int J Energy Res, 2006, 30: 115-126
|
| [30] |
DaiY, WangJ, GaoL. Exergy analysis, parametric analysis and optimization for a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle [J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2009, 29: 1983-1990
|
| [31] |
KwonY, KwakH, OhS. Exergoeconomic analysis of gas turbine cogeneration systems [J]. Exergy Int J, 2001, 1: 31-40
|
| [32] |
CardonaE, PiacentinoA. A new approach to exergoeconomic analysis and design of variable demand energy systems [J]. Energy, 2006, 31: 490-515
|
| [33] |
LaiN A, FischerJ. Efficiencies of power flash cycles [J]. Energy, 2012, 44: 1017-1027
|
| [34] |
LecompteS, LemmensS, VerbruggenA, van den BroekM, de PaepeM. Thermo-economic comparison of advanced organic Rankine cycles [J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 61: 71-74
|
| [35] |
BrysonM JThe conversion of low grade heat into electricity using the thermosyphon Rankine engine and trilateral flash cycle [D], 2007MelbourneRMIT University
|
| [36] |
BrysonM, AkbarzadehA, DixonC. Applying the trilateral flash cycle to the portland geothermal resource to produce power [C]. Proc Destin. Renewables - ANZSES. Melbourne, 2003228-238
|
| [37] |
FischerJ. Comparison of trilateral cycles and organic Rankine cycles [J]. Energy, 2011, 36: 6208-6219
|
| [38] |
BrownB W, MinesG L. Flowsheet simulation of the trilateral cycle [C]. Proc Trans - Geotherm Resour Counc, 1998373-378
|
| [39] |
WangW, WuY T, MaC F, LiuL D, YuJ. Preliminary experimental study of single screw expander prototype [J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2011, 31: 3684-3688
|
| [40] |
DateA, VahajiS, AndrewsJ, AkbarzadehA. Experimental performance of a rotating two-phase reaction turbine [J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2015, 76: 475-483
|
| [41] |
LeV L, KheiriA, FeidtM, Pelloux-PrayerS. Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid [J]. Energy, 2014, 78: 622-638
|
| [42] |
KleinS AEngineering equation solver (EES): USA, Commercial and Professional Versions F-Chart Software © 1992–2014 [S], 2014
|
| [43] |
ChenH, Yogi GoswamiD, RahmanM M, StefanakosE K. Energetic and exergetic analysis of CO2- and R32-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat conversion [J]. Appl Energy, 2011, 88: 2802-2808
|
| [44] |
ChenHThe conversion of low-grade heat into power using supercritical Rankine cycles [D], 2010FloridaUniversity of South Florida
|