Effects of nonlinear strength parameters on stability of 3D soil slopes

Abstract

Actual slope stability problems have three-dimensional (3D) characteristics and the soils of slopes have curved failure envelopes. This incorporates a power-law nonlinear failure criterion into the kinematic approach of limit analysis to conduct the evaluation of the stability of 3D slopes. A tangential technique is adopted to simplify the nonlinear failure criterion in the form of equivalent Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters. A class of 3D admissible rotational failure mechanisms is selected for soil slopes including three types of failure mechanisms: face failure, base failure, and toe failure. The upper-bound solutions and corresponding critical slip surfaces can be obtained by an efficient optimization method. The results indicate that the nonlinear parameters have significant influences on the assessment of slope stability, especially on the type of failure mechanism. The effects of nonlinear parameters appear to be pronounced for gentle slopes constrained to a narrow width. Compared with the solutions derived from plane-strain analysis, the 3D solutions are more sensitive to the values of nonlinear parameters.

Keywords

three-dimensional slope / nonlinear failure criterion / limit analysis / stability / critical slip surface

References

[1] PenmanA. Shear characteristics of saturated silt measured in triaxial compression [J]. Géotechnique, 1953, 3(8): 312-328

[2] BishopA W, WebbD L, LewinP I. Undisturbed samples of London clay from the Ashford Common shaft: Strength-effective normal stress relationship [J]. Géotechnique, 1965, 15(1): 1-31

[3] PonceV M, BellJ M. Shear strength of sand at extremely low pressures [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1971, 97(4): 625-637

[4] LefebvreG. Strength and slope stability in Canadian soft clay deposits [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1981, 18(3): 420-442

[5] MaksimovicM. Nonlinear failure envelope for soils [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1989, 115(4): 581-586

[6] de MelloV F B. Reflections on design decisions of practical significance to embankment dams-17th Rankine lecture [J]. Géotechnique, 1977, 27: 281-354

[7] CharlesJ A. An appraisal of the influence of a curved failure envelope on slope stability [J]. Géotechnique, 1982, 32(4): 389-392

[8] ZhangX J, ChenW F. Stability analysis of slopes with general nonlinear failure criterion [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1987, 11(1): 33-50

[9] BakerR. Nonlinear Mohr envelopes based on triaxial data [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2004, 130(5): 498-506

[10] TaylorR K. Properties of mining wastes with respect to foundations [M]. Foundation Engineering in Difficult Ground, 1978LondonNewnes-Butterworth175-203

[11] CharlesJ A, SoaresM M. The stability of slopes in soils with nonlinear failure envelopes [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1984, 21(3): 397-406

[12] PerryJ. A technique for defining non-linear shear strength envelopes and their incorporation in a slope stability method of analysis [J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 1994, 27: 231-241

[13] DrescherA, ChristopoulosC. Limit analysis slope stability with nonlinear yield condition [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1988, 12(5): 341-345

[14] YangX-l, YinJ-hua. Slope stability analysis with nonlinear failure criterion [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2004, 130(3): 267-273

[15] YangX-l, HuangFu. Slope stability analysis considering joined influences of nonlinearity and dilation [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2009, 16: 292-296

[16] ZhaoL-h, LiL, YangF, LuoQ, Liuxiang. Upper bound analysis of slope stability with nonlinear failure criterion based on strength reduction technique [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2010, 17: 836-844

[17] ZhaoL-h, YangF, ZhangY-b, DanH-s, LiuW-zheng. Effects of shear strength reduction strategies on safety factor of homogeneous slope based on a general nonlinear failure criterion [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 63: 215-228

[18] BakerR. Variational slope stability analysis of materials with non-linear failure criterion [J]. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 10: 19

[19] LiX. Finite element analysis of slope stability using a nonlinear failure criterion [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2007, 34(3): 127-136

[20] LiD-z, ChengY-ming. Lower bound limit analysis using nonlinear failure criteria [J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 2012, 5: 170-174

[21] YangX-g, ChiS-chun. Upper bound finite element analysis of slope stability using a nonlinear failure criterion [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 54(10): 185-191

[22] JiangJ C, BakerR, YamagamiT. The effect of strength envelope nonlinearity on slope stability computations [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(2): 308-325

[23] DengD-p, ZhaoL-h, LiLiang. Limit equilibrium slope stability analysis using the nonlinear strength failure criterion [OL/OJ]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014

[24] MichalowskiR L, DrescherA. Three-dimensional stability of slopes and excavations [J]. Géotechnique, 2009, 59(10): 839-850

[25] GaoY-f, ZhangF, LeiG-h, LiD-yong. An extended limit analysis of three-dimensional slope stability [J]. Géotechnique, 2013, 63(6): 518-524

[26] ChenW FLimit analysis and soil plasticity [M], 1975AmsterdamElsevier

[27] ChenW F, LiuX LLimit analysis in soil mechanics [M], 1990AmsterdamElsevier

[28] MichalowskiR L, YouL Z. Displacements of reinforced slopes subjected to seismic loads [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2000, 126(8): 685-694

[29] ChenZ-yu. Random trials used in determining global minimum factors of safety of slopes [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1992, 29(2): 225-233