Direct AFM measurements of morphology and interaction force at solid-liquid interfaces between DTAC/CTAC and mica

Zhen Xie , Hao Jiang , Zhong-cheng Sun , Qin-hong Yang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (9) : 2182 -2190.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (9) : 2182 -2190. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-016-3275-x
Materials, Metallurgy, Chemical and Environmental Engineering

Direct AFM measurements of morphology and interaction force at solid-liquid interfaces between DTAC/CTAC and mica

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The adsorption of dedecyltrimethylammoium chloride (DTAC) and hexadecyltrimethylammoium chloride (CTAC) on muscovite mica substrates was examined using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Adsorption morphology images and interaction forces of cationic surfactants at solid-solution interfaces were measured in tapping mode and PicoForce mode, respectively. The images demonstrated that the adsorbed structure was varied by a variety of surfactant concentrations. The adsorbed layer on mica was monolayer at first, and then became bilayer. A striped adsorbed structure was observed in a higher concentration of CTAC, which could not be found in any other concentrations of DTAC. For force measurements, the repulsive force was exponentially decreasing with the concentration increasing till a net attractive force appeared. A largest attractive force could be observed at a certain concentration, which was close to the point of charge neutralization. The results also showed a significant impact of hydrocarbon chain length on adsorption. An adsorption simulation was established to give a clear understanding of the interaction between cationic surfactants and mica.

Keywords

adsorption / cationic surfactants / interaction force / atomic force microscopy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhen Xie, Hao Jiang, Zhong-cheng Sun, Qin-hong Yang. Direct AFM measurements of morphology and interaction force at solid-liquid interfaces between DTAC/CTAC and mica. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(9): 2182-2190 DOI:10.1007/s11771-016-3275-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

GaudinA M, FuerstenauD W. Streaming potential studies—Quartz flotation with cationic collectors [J]. AIME Transactions, 1955, 202: 958-962

[2]

LevitzP, van DammeH, KeravisD. Fluorescence decay study of the adsorption of nonionic surfactants at the solid-liquid interface. 1. Structure of the adsorption layer on a hydrophilic solid [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1984, 88(11): 2228-2235

[3]

LevitzP, van DammeH. Fluorescence decay study of the adsorption of nonionic surfactants at the solid-liquid interface. 2. Influence of polar chain length [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1986, 90(7): 1302-1310

[4]

BinnigG, QuateC F, GerberC. Atomic force microscope [J]. The Physical Review Journals, 1986, 56(9): 930-993

[5]

WangJ-l, LiZ-l, YoonR H, JanC E. Surface forces in thin liquid films of n-alcohols and of water-ethanol mixtures confined between hydrophobic surfaces [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 379(1): 114-120

[6]

LokerW J, DuckerW A. Proximal adsorption of dodecyltrimethy-lammonium bromide to the silica-electrolyte solution interface [J]. Langmuir, 2002, 18(8): 3167-3175

[7]

LiuJ-j, XuZ-h, MasliyahJ. Studies on bitumen-silica interaction in aqueous solutions by AFM [J]. Langmuir, 2003, 19(9): 3911-3920

[8]

LokarW J, DuckerW A. Proximal adsorption at glass surfaces: Ionic strength, pH, chain length effects [J]. Langmuir, 2004, 20(2): 378-388

[9]

GregoryG W. Surfactant adsorbed layer structure at solid/solution interfaces: impact and implications of AFM imaging studies [J]. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2000, 5(1): 88-94

[10]

BlomaA, WarrG G, NelsonA. Structure of mixed DTAB/DDAB adsorbed layers on quartz A neutron reflectometry and atomic force microscopy study [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem and Engineering Aspects, 2007, 310(1): 1-8

[11]

SainioT, TurkuI. Adsorption of cationic surfactants on a neutral polymer adsorbent: Investigation of the interactions by using mathematical modeling [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:^Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2010, 358(1): 57-67

[12]

BakkerM G, MorrisT A, TurnerG L, GrangerE. Surfactant aggregates (solids) adsorbed on silica as stationary chromatographic phases: Structures and properties [J]. Journal of Chromatography B, 2000, 743(1): 65-78

[13]

ManneS, GaubH E. Molecular organization of surfactants at solid-liquid interfaces [J]. Science, 1995, 270(5241): 1480-1482

[14]

ShahK, ChiuP, SinnottS B. Comparison of morphology and mechanical properties of surfactant aggregates at water-silica and water-graphite interfaces from molecular dynamics simulations [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 296(1): 342-349

[15]

ZhaoF, DuY-k, XuJ-kun. Molecular morphology of modified partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (MHPAM) on mica substrates and Langmuir-Blodgett films of MHPAM/CTAB complexes as observed by AFM [J]. European Polymer Journal, 2007, 43(3): 797-801

[16]

AnnabelleB, FranckP D, LaszloK, GregorygW. Direct visualisation of mesh structures at solid/solution interfaces by AFM [J]. Langmuir, 2004, 20(4): 1291-1297

[17]

van OsN M, HaakJ R, RupertL A MPhysico-chemical properties of selected anionic, cationic and nonionic surfactants [M], 1993AmsterdamElsevier

[18]

LiuJ-f, DuckerW A. Surface-induced phase behavior of alkyltrimethy-lammonium bromide surfactants adsorbed to mica, silica, and graphite [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1999, 103: 8558-8567

[19]

LokerW J, DuckerW A. Proximal adsorption of dodecyltrimethy-lammonium bromide to the silica-electrolyte solution interface [J]. Langmuir, 2002, 18(8): 3167-3175

[20]

DuckerW A, WanlessE J. Adsorption of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide to mica: Nanometer-scale study of binding-site competition effects [J]. Langmuir, 1999, 15(1): 160-168

[21]

LiuJ-f, MinG, DuckerW A. AFM study of adsorption of cationic surfactants and cationic polyelectrolytes at the silica-water interface [J]. Langmuir, 2001, 17(16): 4895-4903

[22]

KongL-x, YangB, LiY-f, XuB-q, HanL, LiuD-c, DaiY-nian. Application of molecular interaction volume model in separation of Sn-Zn alloy by vacuum distillation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(10): 3372-3378

[23]

LiuJ-j, XuZ-h, MasliyahJ. Colloidal forces between bitumen surfaces measured with atomic force microscopy in aqueous solutions [J]. Colloid and Surfaces A: Phusicochem, 2005, 260(1/2/3): 217-228

[24]

ButtH J, CappellaB, KapplM. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications [J]. Surface Science Reports, 2005, 59(1): 1-152

[25]

YoonR H. The role of hydrodynamic and surface forces in bubble-particle interaction [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2000, 58(1): 129-143

[26]

LiuJ-d, SunWei. Flotation technology and adsorption mechanism of collector CSU-M to molybdenum oxide in Ni-Mo ore [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2014, 45(12): 4105-4110

[27]

IshidaN. Direct measurement of hydrophobic particle-bubble interactions in aqueous solutions by atomic force microscopy: Effect of particle hydrophobicity [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A, 2007, 300(3): 293-299

[28]

RamzanM, AhmedE, NiazN A, RanaA M, BhattiA S, KhalidN R, NadeemM Y. AFM applications to study the morphology of HfO2 multilayer thin films [J]. Superlattices and Microstructures, 2015, 82: 399-405

[29]

PhilippS, ThomasU, ValtinerM. Direct and quantitative AFM measurements of the concentration and temperature dependence of the hydrophobic force law at nanoscopic contacts [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2015, 446: 244-251

[30]

ZhangJ-h, YoonR H, MaoM, DuckerW A. Effects of degassing and ionic strength on AFM force measurements in octadecyltrimethylammonium chloride solutions [J]. Langmuir, 2005, 21(13): 5831-5841

[31]

ZhangJ-h, YoonR H, ErikssonJ C. AFM surface force measurements conducted with silica in CnTACl solutions: Effect of chain length on hydrophobic force [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2007, 300(3): 335-345

[32]

SchubertH. Nanobubbles, hydrophobic effect, heterocoagulation and hydrodynamics in flotation [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2005, 78(1): 11-21

[33]

HerderP C. Interactions between mica surfaces in dodecyl- and octylammonium chloride solutions [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1990, 134(2): 346-356

[34]

RutlandM W, WaltermoA, ClaessonP. pH-dependent interactions of mica surfaces in aqueous dodecylamonium/dodecylamine solutions [J]. Langmuir, 1992, 8(1): 176-183

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

105

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/