Applications of fluid substitution effect analysis on seismic interpretation

Abstract

The root mean square (RMS) difference of time-lapse seismic amplitudes is routinely used to identify the substituted fluid type in a reservoir during oil field production and recovery. By a time-lapse seismic method, we study the effects of fluid substitution in a physical model, which is an analogy of the three-dimensional inhomogeneous reservoir. For a weak inhomogeneous medium, gas/oil substitution results in positive anomalies in the reservoir layers, and negative anomalies below the bottom of the reservoir layers; while water/oil substitution causes only weak variations in the reservoir layers, but positive anomalies below the bottom of the reservoir layers. For the strong inhomogeneous medium, no matter what kind of fluid substitution (gas/oil or water/oil), there are significant anomalies in seismic amplitude difference attributes both in and below the reservoir layers. Therefore, for weak inhomogeneous media, such as tight sandstone or thin interbedded layers, the RMS amplitude difference attributes can be used to monitor fluid changes and predict the drilling direction; for inhomogeneous medium with karst carves or fractures, it is difficult to accurately determine the distribution of fluids with the RMS amplitude difference attributes.

Keywords

inhomogeneous medium / physical modeling / time-lapse seismic technique / fluid substitution effect / seismic attribute

References

[1] LiJ.-y., DvorkinJ.. Effects of fluid changes on seismic reflections: Predicting amplitudes at gas reservoir directly from amplitudes at wet reservoir [J]. Geophysics, 2012, 77(4): D129-D140

[2] LiJ.-y.. Fluid substitution in a shaley sandstone reservoir at seismic scale [J]. Petroleum Science, 2012, 9(1): 31-37

[3] ShenW.-j., LiuX.-h., LiX.-z., LuJ.-l.. Water coning mechanism in Tarim fractured sandstone gas reservoirs [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(1): 344-349

[4] ChuaiX.-y., WangS.-x., ShiP.-d., WeiX., ChenW.. Applications of texture attribute analysis to seismic interpretation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(9): 3617-3626

[5] YuanY., ZhangJ.-l., LiC.-l., MengN.-n., LiY.. Seismic sedimentology of conglomeratic sandbodies in lower third member of Shahejie Formation (Palaeogene) in Shengtuo area, East China [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(12): 4630-4639

[6] ZhangH., GaoQ., XuB.. Scattering wave field around a cavity with circular cross-section embedded in saturated soil using boundary element method [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(11): 3296-3304

[7] KorneevV. A., GoloshubinG. M., DaleyT. M., SilinD. M.. Seismic low-frequency effects in monitoring fluid-saturated reservoirs [J]. Geophysics, 2004, 69(2): 522-532

[8] LiJ.-y., ChenX.-h.. A rock-physical modeling method for carbonate reservoirs at seismic scale [J]. Applied Geophysics., 2013, 10(1): 1-13

[9] GoodwayW., ChenT., DowntonJ.. Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lame petrophysical parameters [C]. 67th SEG Annual International Meeting. America: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1997183-186

[10] CastagnaJ. P., SwanH. W.. Principles of AVO crossplotting [J]. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(4): 337-342

[11] HedlinK.. Pore space modulus and extraction using AVO [C]. 70th SEG Annual International Meeting. America: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2000170-173

[12] RussellB. H., HedlinK., HiltermanF. J., LinesL. R.. Fluid-property discrimination with AVO: A Biot-Gassmann perspective [J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(1): 29-39

[13] CastagnaJ. P., SunS., SiegfriedR. W.. Instantaneous spectral analysis: Detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons [J]. The leading Edge, 2003, 22(2): 129-127

[14] SinhaS. K., RouthP. S., AnnoP. D., CastagnaJ. P.. Time frequency attribute of seismic data using continuous wavelet transform [C]. 73rd SEG Annual International Meeting. America: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 20031481-1484

[15] HanJ. J., van der MirkoB.. Complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition for seismic time-frequency analysis [C]. 82th SEG Annual International Meeting. America: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 20121-5

[16] HanJ. J., van der MirkoB.. Empirical mode decomposition for seismic time-frequency analysis [J]. Geophysics, 2013, 78(2): 9-19

[17] WandlerA., EvansB., LinkC.. AVO as a fluid indicator: A physical modeling study [J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(1): C9-C17

[18] ChuaiX.-y., WangS.-x., ShiP.-d., WeiX., ChenW.. Applications of texture attribute analysis to seismic interpretation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(9): 3617-3626

[19] LiJ.-y., WanS.-d.. Pressure monitoring on the real thin inter-layer gas reservoir by time-lapse seismic method [J]. Journal of Petroleum and Gas Exploration Research, 2011, 1(2): 51-58

[20] LiJ. T., LinerC., StewartR.. Time-lapse seismic modeling for CO₂ sequestration at the Dickman Oilfield, Kansas [J]. Geophysics, 2014, 79(2): B81-B95

[21] WangS. X., LiX. Y., DiB. R., BoothD.. Reservoir fluid substitution effects on seismic profile interpretation: A physical modeling experiment [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2010, 37: L10306

[22] WuR.-s., AkiK.. Scattering characteristics of elastic waves by an elastic heterogeneity [J]. Geophysics, 1985, 50(4): 582-595