A DEM investigation on simple shear behavior of dense granular assemblies

Abstract

A micromechanical investigation on simple shear behavior of dense granular assemblies was carried out by discrete element method. Three series of numerical tests were performed to examine the effects of initial porosity, vertical stress and particle shape on simple shear behavior of the samples, respectively. It was found that during simple shear the directions of principal stress and principal strain increment rotate differently with shear strain level. The non-coaxiality between the two directions decreases with strain level and may greatly affect the shear behavior of the assemblies, especially their peak friction angles. The numerical modelling also reveals that the rotation of the principal direction of fabric anisotropy lags behind that of the major principal stress direction during simple shear, which is described as fabric hyteresis effect. The degrees of fabric and interparticle contact force anisotropies increase as particle angularity increases, whereas the orientations of these anisotropies have not been significantly influenced by particle shape. An extended stress-dilatancy relationship based on ROWE-DAVIS framework was proposed to consider the non-coaxiality effect under principal stress rotation. The model was validated by present numerical results as well as some published physical test and numerical modelled data.

Keywords

simple shear / non-coaxiality / fabric anisotropy / shear strength / discrete element method

References

[1] ThayS, LikitlersuangS, PipatpongsaT. Monotonic and cyclic behavior of Chiang Mai sand under simple shear mode [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2013, 31(1): 67-82

[2] KjellmanW. Testing the shear strength of clay in Sweden [J]. Geotechnique, 1951, 2(3): 225-232

[3] MortezaieA R, VuceticM. Effect of frequency and vertical stress on cyclic degradation and pore water pressure in clay in the NGI simple shear device [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(10): 1727-1737

[4] RutherfordC J, BiscontinG. Development of a multidirectional simple shear testing device [J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2013, 36(6): 1-9

[5] Eseller-BayatE, GokverS, YegianM K, OrtakciE, AlshawabkehA. Design and application of simple shear liquefaction box [J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2013, 36(3): 1-9

[6] OdaM, KonishiJ. Microscopic deformation mechanism of granular material in simple shear [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1974, 14(4): 25-38

[7] MatsuokaH. A microscopic study on shear mechanism of granular materials [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1974, 14(1): 29-43

[8] LiuS-h, LuT-hao. Microscopic shear mechanism of granular materials in simple shear by DEM [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(5): 608-611

[9] ThorntonC, ZhangL. A numerical examination of shear banding and simple shear non-coaxial flow rules [J]. Philosophical Magazine, 2006, 86(21/22): 3425-3452

[10] ShenC K O, SullivanC, JardineR J. A micromechanical investigation of drained simple shear tests [C]. International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, 2011Seoul, KoreaIOS Press314-321

[11] QianJ-g, YouZ-p, HuangM-song. Anisotropic characteristics of granular materials under simple shear [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(8): 2275-2284

[12] ZhouJ, ShiD-d, JiaM-cai. Numerical simulation of mechanical response on sand under monotonic loading by particle flow code [J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2007, 35(10): 1299-1304

[13] PradhanT B S, TatsuokaF, HoriiN. Simple shear testing on sand in a torsional shear apparatus [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1988, 28(2): 95-112

[14] VerdugoR, IshiharaK. The steady state of sandy soils [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(2): 81-91

[15] AtkinsonJ, LauW H W, PowellJ J M. Measurement of soil strength in simple shear tests [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1991, 28(3): 255-262

[16] RoweP W. The stress dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1962, 269(1239): 500-527

[17] DavisE HLeeK I. Theories of plasticity and the failure of soil masses [M]. Soil Mechanics: Selected Topics, 1968LondonButterworth341-380

[18] ShiD-d, ZhouJ, LiuW-b, DengY-bing. Exploring macro- and micro-scale responses of sand in direct shear tests by numerical simulations using non-circular particles [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(10): 1557-1565

[19] OdaM, KonishiJ. Rotation of principal stresses in granular material during simple shear [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1974, 14(4): 39-53

[20] StroudM AThe behavior of sand at low stress levels in the simple shear apparatus [D], 1971University of CambridgeCambridge

[21] ShibuyaS, MitachiT, TamateS. Interpretation of direct shear box testing of sands as quasi-simple shear [J]. Geotechnique, 1997, 47(4): 769-790

[22] YangZ X, LiX S, YangJ. Quantifying and modeling fabric anisotropy of granular soils [J]. Geotechnique, 2008, 58(4): 237-248

[23] SitharamT G, VinodJ S, RavishankarB V. Postliquefaction undrained monotonic behavior of sands: experiments and DEM simulations [J]. Geotechnique, 2009, 59(9): 739-749

[24] RothenburgL, BathurstR J. Analytical study of induced anisotropy in idealized granular materials [J]. Geotechnique, 1989, 39(4): 601-614

[25] WangJ, DoveJ E, GutierrezM S. Discrete-continuum analysis of shear banding in the direct shear test [J]. Geotechnique, 2007, 57(6): 513-526

[26] OdaM. Initial fabrics and their relations to mechanical properties of granular material [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1972, 12(1): 17-36

[27] HosseininiaE S. Stress-force-fabric relationship for planar granular materials [J]. Geotechnique, 2013, 63(10): 830-841

[28] LiX, YuH S. On the stress-force-fabric relationship for granular materials [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2013, 50(9): 1285-1302

[29] LiX, YuH S. Applicability of stress-force-fabric relationship for non-proportional loading [J]. Computers and Structures, 2011, 89(11/12): 1094-1102