Layout and support design of a coal roadway in ultra-close multiple-seams

Hong Yan , Ming-yue Weng , Rui-min Feng , Wei-Kang Li

Journal of Central South University ›› 2015, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (11) : 4385 -4395.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2015, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (11) : 4385 -4395. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-015-2987-7
Article

Layout and support design of a coal roadway in ultra-close multiple-seams

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A roadway within ultra-close multiple-seams (RUCMSs) is one of the most difficult supported coal roadways to deal with in underground coal mines. This is usually due to the unknown stress distributions, improper roadway layout, and unreasonable support parameters. In order to solve this support problem and effectively save RUCMSs from frequent and abrupt disasters (such as serious deformation of the surrounding rock, roof cave ins, and coal side collapse), a comprehensive method is adopted here which includes theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and field monitoring. A mechanical model was constructed to determine the stress distribution in the coal pillar after two sides of a longwall panel had been mined. Based on this model, the horizontal, vertical, and tangential stress equations for the plane below the floor of the upper-left coal pillar were deduced. In addition, a typical coal mine (the Jinggonger colliery, located in Shuozhou city, Shanxi province, China) with an average distance between its 9# and 11# coal seams of less than 8.0 was chosen to conduct research on the proper layout and reasonable support required for a typical coal roadway located within coal seam 11#. Using FLAC3D (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3-Dimensions) numerical software, eight schemes were designed with different horizontal distances (d) between the center lines of the coal pillar and the roadway in the lower coal seam (RLCS). The simulations and detailed analysis indicate that the proper distances required are between 22.5 and 27.5 m. A total of 20 simulation schemes were used to investigate the factors influencing the support provided by the key bolts (bolt length, spacing, distance between two rows, installation angle, and pre-tightening force). The results were analyzed and used to determine reasonable values for the support parameters. Field results show that the stability and strength of the RLCS can be effectively safeguarded using a combination of researched stress distribution characteristics, proper layout of the RLCS, and correct support parameters.

Keywords

ultra-close multiple-seams / coal roadway / stress distribution / roof caving

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hong Yan, Ming-yue Weng, Rui-min Feng, Wei-Kang Li. Layout and support design of a coal roadway in ultra-close multiple-seams. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(11): 4385-4395 DOI:10.1007/s11771-015-2987-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

WangJ-c, WangL, LiY, YangB-gui. Underground mining technology in Chinese coal mines [C]// Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. Morgantown, WV, 2014367-372

[2]

GongF-q, LiX-b, GaoKe. Catastrophe progression method for stability classification of underground engineering surrounding rock [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2008, 39(5): 1081-1086

[3]

ZhaoZ-h, WangW-m, WangLei. Response models of weakly consolidated soft rock roadway under different interior pressures considering dilatancy effect [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(12): 3736-3744

[4]

ZhangB S, KangL X, ZhaiY D. Definition of ultra-close multiple-seams and its ground pressure behavior [C]// Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. Morgantown, WV, 2005110-113

[5]

LiJ-t, CaoPing. Catastrophe analysis on pillar instability considered mining effect [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2005, 12(1): 102-106

[6]

State Administration of Coal Mine Safety.Safety regulations in coal mines [M], 2011BeijingChina Coal Industry Publishing House

[7]

GaleW J. Multi seam layout guidelines and feasibility of partial chain pillar removal Australian coal association research program [R]. Wollongong, 2004

[8]

YangW, LinB-q, QuY-a, LiZ-w, ZhaiC, JiaL-l, ZhaoW-qiang. Stress evolution with time and space during mining of a coal seam [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2011, 48(1): 1145-1152

[9]

YavuzH. An estimation method for cover pressure re-establishment distance and pressure distribution in the goaf of longwall coal mines [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2004, 41(2): 193-205

[10]

SuchowerskaA M, MerifieldR S, CarterJ P. Vertical stress changes in multi-seam mining under supercritical longwall panels [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2013, 61: 306-320

[11]

JiangP-f, KangH-p, ZhangJ, LinJ, SiL-po. Mechanism of load-transfer between coal pillars with different widths in mining the short-range seams [J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2011, 28(3): 345-349

[12]

HsiungS M, PengS S. Design guidelines for multiple seam mining. Part I [J]. Coal Mining, 1987, 24(9): 42-46

[13]

MorsyK, YassienA, PengS S. Multiple seam mining interactions — A case study [C]// Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. Morgantown, WV, 2006308-314

[14]

HillR W. Multi-seam mining on south african collieries [C]// Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. Morgantown, WV, 1995305-311

[15]

LightfootN, LiuN. The prediction of pillar interaction effects for deep multi-seam mining [C]// Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. Morgantown: WV, 20108-16

[16]

ZhuTaoStudy on longwall mining pressure and control beneath the area mined with longwall-pillar method in ulta-close multiple-seams [D], 2007TaiyuanTaiyuan University of Technology

[17]

ZhangB-s, YangS-s, KangL-x, ZhaiY-da. Discussion on method for determining reasonable position of roadway for ultra-close multi-seam [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(1): 97-101

[18]

ZhangW, ZhangD-s, ChenJ-b, WangX-f, XuM-tang. Determining the optimum gateway location for extremely close coal seams [J]. Journal of China University Mining & Technology, 2012, 41(2): 182-188

[19]

ZhengB-s, XieW-b, DouL-ming. A surrounding rock controlling technique of roadway affected by dynamic stress in ¡°Islet Face¡± of adjacent coal seam [J]. Journal of China University Mining & Technology, 2006, 35(4): 483-487

[20]

WuA-m, ZuoJ-p, GuoZ-b, LiY-chun. Failure causes and support countermeasures of gateway in seam with close distance to other seams in Qianjiaying mine [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2010, 38(1): 13-16

[21]

WangX-wei. Coal mining technology for seam under above goaf with very short distance in Sitai mine [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2010, 32(12): 23-26

[22]

ShenY-caiStudy on the support technology of the roadway in the loose coal seam below close range goaf [D], 2008XuzhouChina University of Mining and Technology

[23]

XueJ-s, FanZ-z, HuangZ-zeng. Determination on rational location of two gateways in coal mining face under goaf with ultra short distance to mining seam [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2012, 40(4): 37-41

[24]

CaiG-shunStudy on roadway layout & supporting in ultra-close distance coal seams mining of Zhongxing mine [D], 2013BeijingChina University of Mining and Technology (Beijing)

[25]

DunZ-l, GaoJ-meiElasticity and its application on the geotechnical engineering [M], 2003BeijingChina Coal Industry Publishing House

[26]

WilsonA H, AshwinD P. Research into the determination of pillar size [J]. Min Eng, 1972, 141: 409-417

[27]

CarrF, WilsonA H. A new approach to the design of multi-entry developments for retreat longwall mining [C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. Morgantown, 19821-21

[28]

Itasca Consulting Group.. FLAC3D User’s Guide [M]. Minneapolis, Itasca, 2005

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

129

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/