Hydro-mechanical modeling of impermeable discontinuity in rock by extended finite element method

Abstract

The extended finite element method (XFEM) is a numerical method for modeling discontinuities within the classical finite element framework. The computation mesh in XFEM is independent of the discontinuities, such that remeshing for moving discontinuities can be overcome. The extended finite element method is presented for hydro-mechanical modeling of impermeable discontinuities in rock. The governing equation of XFEM for hydraulic fracture modeling is derived by the virtual work principle of the fracture problem considering the water pressure on crack surface. The coupling relationship between water pressure gradient on crack surface and fracture opening width is obtained by semi-analytical and semi-numerical method. This method simplifies coupling analysis iteration and improves computational precision. Finally, the efficiency of the proposed method for modeling hydraulic fracture problems is verified by two examples and the advantages of the XFEM for hydraulic fracturing analysis are displayed.

Keywords

extended finite element method / crack / hydraulic fracture / fluid flow / coupling model / impermeable discontinuities

References

[1] AdachiJ I, DetournayE. Plane strain propagation of a hydraulic fracture in a permeable rock [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4666-4694

[2] DetournayE. Propagation regimes of fluid-driven fractures in impermeable rocks [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2004, 4: 35-45

[3] GaragashD I. Plane-strain propagation of a fluid-driven fracture during injection and shut-in: Asymptotics of large toughness [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2006, 73(4): 456-481

[4] HuJ, GaragashD I. Plane-strain propagation of a fluid-driven crack in a permeable rock with fracture toughness [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 136(9): 1152-1166

[5] MitchellS L, KuskeR, PeirceA P. An asymptotic framework for the analysis of hydraulic fractures: The impermeable case [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2006, 74(2): 365-372

[6] AdachiJ, SiebritsE, PeirceA, DesrochesJ. Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining, 2007, 44(5): 739-757

[7] SimoniL, SecchiS. Cohesive fracture mechanics for a multi-phase porous medium [J]. Engineering Computations, 2003, 20(5): 675-698

[8] SecchiS, SimoniL, SchreflerB A. Mesh adaptation and transfer schemes for discrete fracture propagation in porous materials [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2007, 31(2): 331-345

[9] SeguraJ M, CarolI. Coupled HM analysis using zero-thickness interface elements with double nodes. Part I: Theoretical model [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2008, 32(18): 2083-2101

[10] BelytschkoT, BlackT. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 45(5): 601-620

[11] RenQ-w, DongY-w, YuT-tang. Numerical modeling of concrete hydraulic fracturing with extended finite element method [J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(3): 559-565

[12] LecampionB. An extended finite element method for hydraulic fracture problems [J]. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2009, 25(2): 121-133

[13] MohamadnejadT, KhoeiA R. Hydro-mechanical modeling of cohesive crack propagation in multi-phase porous media using the extended-FEM technique [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2013, 37(10): 1247-1256

[14] MoËSN, DolbowJ, BelytschkoT. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 46(1): 131-150

[15] FlemingM, ChuY A, MoranB. Enriched element free Galerkin methods for crack tip fields [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1997, 40(8): 1483-1504

[16] LiZ-l, WangY-h, RenQ-wen. Numerical simulation model of hydraulic fracturing of rock with a single fracture under natural hydraulic power [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(4): 727-733

[17] BartonN, BandisS, BakhtarK. Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1985, 22(3): 121-140

[18] BartonN, QuadrosE F. Joint aperture and roughness in the prediction of flow and groutability of rock masses [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(3/4): 252

[19] WaltersM C, PaulinoG H, DoddsR H. Interaction integral procedures for 3-D curved cracks including surface tractions [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2005, 72(11): 1635-1663

[20] FlemingM, ChuY A, MoranB, BelytschkoT. Enriched element free Galerkin methods for crack tip fields [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1997, 40(8): 1483-1504

[21] WuB, LiZ. Static reanalysis of structures with added degrees of freedom [J]. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 22(4): 269-281

[22] BrÜHwilerE, SaoumaV E. Water fracture interaction in concrete-part I: Fracture properties [J]. ACI Materials Journal, 1995, 92(3): 296-303