Comparison of heavy metal removal efficiencies in four activated sludge processes

Abstract

The removal efficiencies of heavy metals (As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) were investigated in the 17 operating municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and compared with those in four main activated sludge processes. Significant differences of heavy metal removal efficiencies were observed among four activated sludge processes. The removal efficiency for As (75.5%) in the oxidation ditch (OD) process is significantly higher than that in the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process (38.6%) or sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process (51.4%). The mean removal efficiencies for Cu and Ni in the OD process are 90.5% and 46.7%, respectively, while low mean removal efficiencies are observed for Cu (69.9%) and Ni (16.5%), respectively, in the SBR process. The removal efficiencies for Cu and Ni in the OD process are significantly higher than those in the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A²-O) process. These results highlight the differences of removal efficiencies for heavy metals in different processes and should be considered when selecting a wastewater treatment process.

Keywords

wastewater / heavy metal / removal efficiency / treatment process / activated sludge processes

References

[1] AldrichA P, KistlerD, SiggL. Speciation of Cu and Zn in drainage water from agricultural soils [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(22): 4824-4830

[2] SongY F, WilkeB M, SongX Y, GongP, ZhouQ X, YangG F. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals (HMs) as well as their genotoxicity in soil after long-term wastewater irrigation [J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 65(10): 1859-1868

[3] KanS, CaoQ, ZhengY M, HuangY Z, ZhuY G. Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China [J]. Environment Pollution, 2008, 152(3): 686-692

[4] Wan NgahW S, HanafiahM A K M. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: A review [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(10): 3935-3948

[5] SimW J, LeeJ W, ShinS K, SongK B, OhJ E. Assessment of fates of estrogens in wastewater and sludge from various types of wastewater treatment plants [J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 82(10): 1448-1453

[6] WangJ-g, LiX-m. Electrochemical treatment of wastewater containing chlorophenols using boron-doped diamond film electrodes [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(7): 1946-1952

[7] LuJ, YanX, MaY-f, TianC-x, DingJ-c. Impact of salinity on treatment of saline wastewater by sequencing batch biofilm reactor process [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(5): 1989-1994

[8] KarvelasM, KatsoyiannisA, SamaraC. Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in the wastewater treatment process [J]. Chemosphere, 2003, 53(10): 1201-1210

[9] BattistoniP, FavaG, RuelloM L. Heavy metal shock load in activated sludge uptake and toxic effects [J]. Water Research, 1993, 27(5): 821-827

[10] KumarJ, BalomajumderC, MondalP. Application of agro-based biomasses for zinc removal from wastewater—A review [J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2011, 39(7): 641-652

[11] HashimotoT, OndaK, NakamuraY, TadaK, MiyaA, MurakamiT. Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process [J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(10): 2117-2126

[12] ChanpiwatP, SthiannopkaoS, KimK W. Metal content variation in wastewater and biosludge from Bangkok’s central wastewater treatment plants [J]. Microchemical Journal, 2010, 95(2): 326-332

[13] YanG, ViraraghavanT. Heavy-metal removal from aqueous solution by fungus Mucor rouxii [J]. Water Research, 2003, 37(18): 4486-4496

[14] ChenY, GuG. Preliminary studies on continuous chromium (VI) biological removal from wastewater by anaerobic-aerobic activated sludge process [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(15): 1713-1721

[15] SalihogluN K. Assessment of urban source metal levels in influent, effluent, and sludge of two municipal biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants of Bursa, an industrial city in Turkey [J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2013, 41(2): 153-165

[16] AnwarA, RumanaG, WanM. Cd(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) removal from contaminated water by biosorption using activated sludge biomass [J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2010, 38(2): 153-158

[17] SirianuntapiboonS, HongsrisuwanT. Removal of Zn2+ and Cu2+ by a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(4): 808-818

[18] ÜStÜNG E. Occurrence and removal of metals in urban wastewater treatment plants [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 17(2/3): 833-838

[19] ChipasaK B. Accumulation and fate of selected heavy metals in a biological wastewater treatment system [J]. Waste Management, 2003, 23(2): 135-143

[20] Oliveira AdaS, BocioA, TrevilatoT M, TakayanaguiA M, DomingoJ L, Segura-MuÑOzS I. Heavy metals in untreated/treated urban effluent and sludge from a biological wastewater treatment plant [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research–International, 2007, 14(7): 483-489

[21] American Public Health Association APHA.Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [M], 1998

[22] CEM. Microware acid digestion of sludges, sediments, soil and oils [EB/OL] [1994-01-04]. http://www.cem.de/documents/pdf/ publikation/digestion/RD055.pdf.

[23] ChangD, FukushiK, GhoshS. Simulation of activated sludge cultures for enhanced heavy metals removal [J]. Water Environment Research, 1995, 67(5): 822-827

[24] WangJ M, HuangC P, AllenH E, PoesponegoroI, Poesponegoro HtakiyamaL R. Effects of dissolved organic matter and pH on heavy metal uptake by sludge particulates exemplified by copper(II) and nickel(II): Three-variable model [J]. Water Environment Research, 1999, 71(2): 139-147

[25] SÖRmeL, LagerkvistR. Sources of heavy metals in urban wastewater in Stockholm [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2002, 298(1/2/3): 131-145

[26] DouX, LiR, ZhaoB, LiangW. Arsenate removal from water by zero-valent iron/activated carbon galvanic couples [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 182(1-3): 108-114

[27] ChevalierP, ProulxD, LessardP, VincentW F, NoueJ. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal by high latitude mat-forming cyanobacteria for potential use in tertiary wastewater treatment [J]. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2000, 12(2): 105-112

[28] GuoC H, StabnikovV, IvanovV. The removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from reject water of municipal wastewater treatment plant using ferric and nitrate bioreductions [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(11): 3992-3999

[29] XuX, GaoB Y, YueQ Y, ZhongQ Q. Preparation of agricultural by-product based anion exchanger and its utilization for nitrate and phosphate removal [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 101(22): 8558-8564

[30] GaoY, MucciA. Individual and competitive adsorption of phosphate and arsenate on goethite in artificial seawater [J]. Chemical Geology, 2003, 199(1/2): 91-109

[31] CarabanteI, GrahnM, HolmgrenA, HedlundJ. In situ ATR–FTIR studies on the competitive adsorption of arsenate and phosphate on ferrihydrite [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 351(2): 523-531

[32] HoffmanD, KringleR. A total error approach for the validation of quantitative analytical methods [J]. Pharmaceutical Research, 2007, 24(6): 1157-1164

[33] StanleyC R, O’DriscollN, RanjanP. Determining the magnitude of true analytical error in geochemical analysis [J]. Geochemistry: Exploration Environment Analysis, 2010, 10(4): 355-364

[34] Al-QodahZ. Biosorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by activated sludge [J]. Desalination, 2006, 196(1/2/3): 164-176

[35] PagnanelliF, MainelliS, BornoroniL, DionisiD, ToroL. Mechanisms of heavy-metal removal by activated sludge [J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 75(8): 1028-1034

[36] SassiM, BestaniB, SaidA H, BenderdoucheN, GuibalE. Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by a local dairy sludge as a biosorbant [J]. Desalination, 2010, 262(1/2/3): 243-250

[37] KimY, PipesW O. Factors influencing suspended solids concentrations in activated sludge settling tanks [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1999, 67(1): 95-109

[38] PophaliG R, KaulS N, NandyT, DevottaS. Development of a novel circular secondary clarifier for improving solids liquid separation in wastewater treatment [J]. Water Environment Research, 2009, 81(2): 140-149

[39] DamayantiA, UjangZ, SalimM R, OlssonG. The effect of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) on biofouling in a hybrid membrane bioreactor for the treatment of high concentration organic wastewater [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2011, 63(8): 1701-1706

[40] Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (GROUP) Co. Ltd. GB 50014 — 2006 Code for design of outdoor wastewater engineering [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2006. (in Chinese)