Coordinated control strategy for robotic-assisted gait training with partial body weight support

Abstract

Walking is the most basic and essential part of the activities of daily living. To enable the elderly and non-ambulatory gait-impaired patients, the repetitive practice of this task, a novel gait training robot (GTR) was designed followed the end-effector principle, and an active partial body weight support (PBWS) system was introduced to facilitate successful gait training. For successful establishment of a walking gait on the GTR with PBWS, the motion laws of the GTR were planned to enable the phase distribution relationships of the cycle step, and the center of gravity (COG) trajectory of the human body during gait training on the GTR was measured. A coordinated control strategy was proposed based on the impedance control principle. A robotic prototype was developed as a platform for evaluating the design concepts and control strategies. Preliminary gait training with a healthy subject was implemented by the robotic-assisted gait training system and the experimental results are encouraging.

Keywords

robotic-assisted gait training / gait training robot (GTR) / partial body weight support (PBWS) / center of gravity (COG) / coordinated control strategy / ground reaction force (GRF)

References

[1] KuboK, MiyoshiT, KanaiA, TerashimaK. Gait rehabilitation device in central nervous system disease: A review [J]. Journal of Robotics, 2011

[2] BurnfieldJ M, ShuY, BusterT, TaylorA. Similarity of joint kinematics and muscle demands between elliptical training and walking: implications for practice [J]. Physical Therapy, 2010, 99(2): 289-305

[3] FisherS, LucasL, ThrasherT A. Robot-assisted gait training for patients with hemiparesis due to stroke [J]. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2011, 18(3): 269-276

[4] SwinnenE, BeckweeD, MeeusenR, BaeyensJ P, KerckhofsE. Does robot-assisted gait rehabilitation improve balance in stroke patients? A systematic review [J]. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2014, 21(2): 87-100

[5] LucareliP R, LimaM O, LimaF P, DealmeidaJ G, BrechG C, D’Andrea GreveJ M. Gait analysis following treadmill training with body weight support versus conventional physical therapy: A prospective randomized controlled single blind study [J]. Spinal Cord, 2011, 49(9): 1001-1007

[6] LauK W, MakM K. Speed-dependent treadmill training is effective to improve gait and balance performance in patients with sub-acute stroke [J]. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2011, 43(8): 709-713

[7] SullivanK J, BrownD A, KlassenT, MulroyS, GeT, AzenS P, WinsteinC J. Effects of task-specific locomotor and strength training in adults who were ambulatory after stroke: Results of the STEPS randomized clinical trial [J]. Physical Therapy, 2007, 87(12): 1580-1602

[8] DobkinB, BarbeauH, DeforgeD, DitunnoJ, ElashofR, AppleD, BassoM, BehrmanA, HarkemaS, SaulinoM, ScottM. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: The multicenter randomized spinal cord injury locomotor trial [J]. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2007, 23(1): 25-35

[9] MatdzahirM A, YamamotoS. Recent trends in lower-limb robotic rehabilitation orthosis: Control scheme and strategy for pneumatic muscle actuated gait trainers [J]. Robotics, 2014, 3(2): 120-148

[10] PietrusinskiM, CajigasI, SeveriniG, BonatoP, MavroidisC. Robotic gait rehabilitation trainer [J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2014, 19(2): 490-499

[11] ColomboG, JoergM, SchreierR, DietzV. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis [J]. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2000, 37(6): 693-700

[12] RienerR, LunenburgerL, JezernikS, AnderschitzM, ColomboG, DietzV. Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: First experimental results [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2005, 13(3): 380-394

[13] VenemanJ F, KruidhofR, HekmanE E, EkkelenkampR, VAN ASSELDONKE H, van der KOOIJH. Design and evaluation of the lopes exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2007, 15(3): 379-386

[14] KoopmanB, VAN ASSELDONKE H, VAN DER KOOIJH, van DIJKW, RonsseRRendering potential wearable robot designs with the LOPES gait trainer [C], 2011Zurich, SwitzerlandIEEE1-6

[15] HesseS, WaldnerA, TomelleriC. Innovative gait robot for the repetitive practice of floor walking and stair climbing up and down in stroke patients [J]. Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation, 2010, 7: 30-40

[16] TaherifarA, HadianMR, MousaviM, RassafA, GhiasiFLOKOIRAN—A novel robot for rehabilitation of spinal cord injury sand stroke patients [C], 2013IranRSI/2SM2183-2223

[17] Transactions of the ASME Journal of Medical Devices, 2011, 5(2

[18] ZhaoX-h, HuangZ-x, LuY-l, SunY-feng. The influence of the ankle dorsiflexion and toes training to improve the motor function of hemiplegic lower limb [J]. Xinjiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2011, 293): 24-26

[19] QinT, ZhangL-xun. Motion planning of a footpad-type walking rehabilitation robot considering motion of metatarsophalangeal joint [J]. Robot, 2014, 36(3): 330-336

[20] LuQ, LiangJ-x, QiaoB, MaOu. A new active body weight support system capable of virtually offloading partial body mass [J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2013, 18(1): 11-20

[21] ZhangL-x, QinT, BaiD-pengA footplate for plantan pressure detection: CN, 201310117737.7 [P], 2013

[22] VaughanC L, DavisB L, O’ConnorJ CDynamics of human gait [M], 1999South AfricaKiboho Publishers8-13

[23] ZhangT, JiangL, LiuHong. A novel grasping force control strategy for multi-fingered prosthetic hand [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(6): 1537-1542