Investigation of pyrite surface state by DFT and AFM

Abstract

The surface states of pyrite (FeS₂) were theoretically investigated using first principle calculation based on the density functional theory (DFT). The results indicate that both the (200) and (311) surfaces of pyrite undergo significant surface atom relaxation after geometry optimization, which results in a considerable distortion of the surface region. In the normal direction, i.e., perpendicular to the surface, S atoms in the first surface layer move outward from the bulk, while Fe atoms move toward the bulk, forming an S-rich surface. The surface relaxation processes are driven by electrostatic interaction, which is evidenced by a relative decrease in the surface energy after surface relaxation. Such a relaxation process is visually interpreted through the qualitative analysis of molecular mechanics. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis reveals that only sulfur atom is visible on the pyrite surface. This result is consistent with the DFT data. Such S-rich surface has important influence on the flotation properties of pyrite.

Keywords

pyrite / density functional theory (DFT) / surface energy / surface relaxation / S-rich surface

References

[1] YianatosJ, CarrascoC, VinnettL, RojasI. Pyrite recovery mechanisms in rougher flotation circuits [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2014, 66-68: 197-201

[2] XianY-j, WenS-m, LiuJ, DengJ-s, BaoS-jun. Discovery of a new source of unavoidable ions in pyrite aqueous solutions [J]. Minerals & Metallurgical Processing, 2013, 30(2): 117-121

[3] ChenJ-h, LiY-q, ChenYe. Cu-S flotation separation via the combination of sodium humate and lime in a low pH medium [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2011, 24(1): 58-63

[4] DeditiusA P, UtsunomiyaS, ReichM, KeslerS E, EwingR C, HoughR M, WalsheJ L. Trace metal nanoparticles in pyrite [J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2011, 42(1): 32-46

[5] AbraitisP K, PattrickR A D, VaughanD J. Variations in the compositional, textural and electrical properties of natural pyrite: A review [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2004, 74(1/2/3/4): 41-59

[6] YalcinE, KelebekS. Flotation kinetics of a pyritic gold ore [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2011, 98(1/2): 48-54

[7] CaiY-f, PanY-g, XueJ-y, SunQ-f, SuG-z, LiXiang. Comparative XPS study between experimentally and naturally weathered pyrites [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2009, 255(21): 8750-8760

[8] AcresR G, HarmerS L, BeattieD A. Synchrotron XPS studies of solution exposed chalcopyrite, bornite, and heterogeneous chalcopyrite with bornite [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2010, 94(1/2): 43-51

[9] ZhangH, LiuY-s, WangB-y, WeiL, KuiR-x, QianH-jie. X-ray absorption near the edge structure and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies on pyrite prepared by thermally sulfurizing iron films [J]. Chinese Physics B, 2009, 18(7): 2734-2738

[10] ChelganiS C, HartB. TOF-SIMS studies of surface chemistry of minerals subjected to flotation separation-A review [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2014, 57: 1-11

[11] GuG-h, SunX-j, LiJ-h, HuY-hua. Influences of collector DLZ on chalcopyrite and pyrite flotation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2010, 17(2): 285-288

[12] QiuG-z, XiaoQ, HuY-hua. First-principles calculation of the electronic structure of the stoichiometric pyrite FeS₂ (100) surface [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2004, 29(1): 89-94

[13] HungA, MuscatJ, YarovskyI, RussoS P. Density-functional theory studies of pyrite FeS₂ (100) and (110) surfaces [J]. Surface Science, 2002, 513(3): 511-524

[14] PayneM C, TeterM P, AllanD C, AriasT A, JoannopulosJ D. Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total-energy calculations: Molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients [J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1992, 62(4): 1045-1097

[15] FrancisG P, PayneM C. Finite basis set corrections to total energy pseudopotential calculations [J]. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 1990, 2(19): 4395-4404

[16] HohenbergP, KohnW. Inhomogeneous electron gas [J]. Physics Review, 1964, 136(3B): 864-871

[17] SegallM D, LindanP J D, ProbertM J, PickardC J, HasnipP J, ClarkS J, PayneM C. First-principles simulation: Ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code [J]. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2002, 14(11): 2717-2744

[18] KresseG, JoubertD. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method [J]. Physics Review B, 1999, 59(3): 1758-1775

[19] PerdewJ P, BurkeK, ErnzerhofM. Generalized gradient approximation made simple [J]. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77(18): 3865-3868

[20] PerdewJ P, ZungerA. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems [J]. Physical Review B, 1981, 23(10): 5048-5079

[21] HungA, MuscatJ, YarovskyI, RussoS P. Density-functional theory studies of pyrite FeS2 (111) and (210) surfaces [J]. Surface Science, 2002, 520(1/2): 111-119

[22] LeeuwN H D, ParkerS C, SitholeH M, NgoepeP E. Modelling surface stability and reactivity of pyrite: Introduction of the new potential model [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2000, 104(33): 7969-7976

[23] OertzenG U V, SkinnerW M, NesbittH W. Ab initio and XPS studies of pyrite^(100) surface states [J]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2006, 75(11): 1855-1860