Is Terzaghi’s effective stress a stress variable under seepage conditions?

Guo-hui Lei , Abraham Chung Fai Chiu , Charles Wang Wai Ng

Journal of Central South University ›› 2015, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6) : 2316 -2321.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2015, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6) : 2316 -2321. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-015-2756-7
Article

Is Terzaghi’s effective stress a stress variable under seepage conditions?

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

From the continuum mechanics perspective, an attempt was made to clarify the role of Terzaghi’s effective stress in the theoretical analysis of saturated soil subjected to seepage. The necessity of performing a coupled hydromechanical analysis to solve the seepage-deformation interaction problem was illustrated by examining the equations of static equilibrium among the effective stress, seepage force, pore-water pressure and total stress. The conceptual definition of stress variable that satisfies the principles of continuum mechanics is applied in the coupled hydromechanical analysis. It is shown that Terzaghi’s effective stress is in fact not a stress variable under seepage conditions, and the seepage force acting on the soil skeleton cannot be viewed as a body force. This offers a clue to the underlying cause of a paradox between the real Pascal’s hydrostatic state and the hydrostatic state predicted by a class of continuum hydromechanical theories.

Keywords

seepage-deformation interaction / coupled hydromechanical analysis / representative elementary volume / stress variable / stress state variable

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guo-hui Lei, Abraham Chung Fai Chiu, Charles Wang Wai Ng. Is Terzaghi’s effective stress a stress variable under seepage conditions?. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(6): 2316-2321 DOI:10.1007/s11771-015-2756-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

LEIG-h C J-jing. Tribological explanation of effective stress controlling shear strength of saturated geomaterials [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(10): 1517-1525

[2]

KHALILIN, GEISERF, BLIGHTG E. Effective stress in unsaturated soils: Review with new evidence [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, 2004, 4(2): 115-126

[3]

HOULSBYG T. Editorial [J]. Géotechnique, 2004, 54(10): 615

[4]

HOULSBYG T. Reply to the discussion on ‘Editorial’ [J]. Géotechnique, 2005, 55(5): 415-417

[5]

BORJAR I. On the mechanical energy and effective stress in saturated and unsaturated porous continua [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(6): 1764-1786

[6]

NUTHM, LALOUIL. Effective stress concept in unsaturated soils: Clarification and validation of a unified framework [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2008, 32(7): 771-801

[7]

RUTQVISTJ, STEPHANSSONO. The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering [J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2003, 11(1): 7-40

[8]

GENSA. The 47th Rankine Lecture: Soil-environment interactions in geotechnical engineering [J]. Géotechnique, 2010, 60(1): 3-74

[9]

LIANGY, WANGJ-j, LIUM-wei. Two-flow model for piping erosion based on liquid-solid coupling [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(8): 2299-2306

[10]

LUOY-l, ZHANM-l, SHENGJ-c, WUQiang. Hydromechanical coupling mechanism on joint of clay core-wall and concrete cut-off wall [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(9): 2578-2585

[11]

LEIG H. Discussion of ‘Seismic performance of earth embankment using simple and advanced numerical approaches’ [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2014, 140(4): 07014003

[12]

HOULSBYG T. The work input to a granular material [J]. Géotechnique, 1979, 29(3): 354-358

[13]

LUN. Is matric suction a stress variable? [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2008, 134(7): 899-905

[14]

TAYLORD WFundamentals of soil mechanics [M], 1948New YorkJohn Wiley & Sons200-204

[15]

IVERSONR M, MAJORJ J. Groundwater seepage vectors and the potential for hillslope failure and debris flow mobilization [J]. Water Resources Research, 1986, 22(11): 1543-1548

[16]

FUNGY CA first course in continuum mechanics [M], 19943Englewood CliffsPrentice-Hall64-81

[17]

RICHARDSR JRPrinciples of solid mechanics [M], 2001Boca RatonCRC Press LLC28-59

[18]

GONZALEZO, STUARTA MA first course in continuum mechanics [M], 2008Cambridge University PressCambridge75-96

[19]

WEGNERJ L, HADDOWJ BElements of continuum mechanics and thermodynamics [M], 2009CambridgeCambridge University Press84-102

[20]

PUZRINA MConstitutive modelling in geomechanics: introduction [M], 2012GermanySpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg5-6

[21]

el TANIM. Hydrostatic paradox of saturated media [J]. Géotechnique, 2007, 57(9): 773-777

[22]

BIOTM A. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1941, 12(2): 155-164

[23]

FILLUNGERPErdbaumechanik? [M], 1936ViennaSelbstverlage des Verfassers1-47

[24]

KOLYMBASD, VERRUIJTA. Discussions of ‘Hydrostatic paradox of saturated media’ [J]. Géotechnique, 2008, 58(10): 835

[25]

el TANIM. Reply to the discussions on ‘Hydrostatic paradox of saturated media’ [J]. Géotechnique, 2008, 58(10): 835-837

[26]

ZIENKIEWICZO C. Coupled problems and their numerical solution [M]//LEWIS R W, BETTESS P, HINTON E. Numerical methods in coupled systems, 1984Chichesterohn Wiley & Sons35-58

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

90

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/