Seismic passive earth thrust of submerged backfill with two-dimensional steady seepage

Abstract

To investigate the seismic passive earth thrust with two-dimensional steady seepage, a general pseudo-dynamic solution was established based on the limit equilibrium analysis. This solution was purposefully applied to a waterfront gravity wall, which retains a submerged backfill with a drainage system along the backfill-structure interface. The wall was assumed to move towards the backfill to the passive failure state. And the theoretical derivation considered the pore pressures induced by the seepage, the excess pore pressures generated by the earthquake and the seismic inertial forces. Thereinto, the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic pressures were calculated by the analytical formulas, while the seismic forces were obtained by the pseudo-dynamic method. In the parametric study, the results indicate that the velocity of shear wave has a more prominent impact on the seismic passive earth thrust than that of primary wave. Both the horizontal and vertical seismic actions decrease the passive earth pressure, but the horizontal one affects the amplitude of the earth pressure coefficient more significantly. Moreover, the soil friction and the wall friction distinctly increase the seismic passive earth pressure just like the static situation. The comparison shows that the results are consistent with the previous work, which verifies its validity.

Keywords

earth pressure / earthquake / pseudo-dynamic method / seepage

References

[1] MatsuzawaH, IshibashiI, KawamuraM. Dynamic soil and water pressures of submerged soils [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(10): 1161-1176

[2] EbelingR M, MorrisonE EThe seismic design of waterfront retaining structures [R], 1993, Washington DC, Office of Navy Technology & Department of the Army

[3] WangJ-j, ZhangH-p, ChaiH-j, ZhuJ-gao. Seismic passive resistance with vertical seepage and surcharge [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 28(9): 728-737

[4] WangJ-j, ChaiH-j, LinX, ChenY-ying. Seismic active earth pressure in saturated soil subjected to steady seepage [J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2011, 33(4): 100-105

[5] WangJ-j, ZhangH-p, LiuM-w, ChenY-ying. Seismic passive earth pressure with seepage for cohesionless soil [J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2012, 30(1): 86-101

[6] SteedmanR S, ZengX. The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall [J]. Geotechnique, 1990, 40(1): 103-112

[7] ZengX, SteedmanR S. On the behaviour of quay walls in earthquakes [J]. Geotechnique, 1993, 43(3): 417-431

[8] ChoudhuryD, NimbalkarS S. Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Geotechnique, 2005, 55(9): 699-702

[9] ChoudhuryD, NimbalkarS S. Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall [J]. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(5): 1103-1113

[10] GhoshP. Seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45(1): 117-123

[11] KolathayarS, GhoshP. Seismic active earth pressure on walls with bilinear backface using pseudo-dynamic approach [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(7): 1229-1236

[12] AhmadS M, ChoudhuryD. Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic design for waterfront reinforced soil-wall [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2008, 26(4): 291-301

[13] AhmadS M, ChoudhuryD. Seismic design factor for sliding of waterfront retaining wall [J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 162(5): 269-276

[14] BellezzaI, D’AlbertoD, FentiniR. Pseudo-dynamic approach for active thrust of submerged soils [J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 165(5): 321-333

[15] BarrosP. A coulomb-type solution for active earth thrust with seepage [J]. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(3): 159-164