Design and fabrication of a large-scale oedometer

Abstract

The most common apparatus used to investigate the load-deformation parameters of homogeneous fine-grained soils is a Casagrande-type oedometer. A typical Casagrande oedometer cell has an internal diameter of 76 mm and a height of 19 mm. However, the dimensions of this kind of apparatus do not meet the requirements of some civil engineering applications like studying load-deformation characteristics of specimens with large-diameter particles such as granular materials or municipal solid waste materials. Therefore, it is decided to design and develop a large-scale oedometer with an internal diameter of 490 mm. The new apparatus provides the possibility to evaluate the load-deformation characteristics of soil specimens with different diameter to height ratios. The designed apparatus is able to measure the coefficient of lateral earth pressure at rest. The details and capabilities of the developed oedometer are provided and discussed. To study the performance and efficiency, a number of consolidation tests were performed on Firoozkoh No. 161 sand using the newly developed large scale oedometer made and also the 50 mm diameter Casagrande oedometer. Benchmark test results show that measured consolidation parameters by large scale oedometer are comparable to values measured by Casagrande type oedometer.

Keywords

load-deformation parameters / large-scale oedometer / Casagrande-type oedometer / coefficient of lateral earth pressure at rest

References

[1] CasagrandeA. The determination of preconsolidation load and its practical significance [C]. 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics Foundation Engineering. Cambridge, 193660-64

[2] NgA M Y, YeungA T, LeeP K K, ThamL G. Design, fabrication, and assembly of a large oedometer [J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2006, 29(4): 1-8

[3] KongkitkulW, KongwisawamitrK, SuwanwattanaV, ThaweeprasartV, SukkarakR. Comparisons of one-dimensional consolidation characteristics of clays by using two different specimen sizes [C]. GeoShanghai International Conference. Shanghai, China, 2014333-342

[4] WeiK M, ZhuS H, YuX H. Influence of the scale effect on the mechanical parameters of coarse-grained soils [J]. Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2014, 38(1): 75-84

[5] CortellazzoG. Comparison between laboratory and in situ values of the coefficient of primary consolidation c_v [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2002, 39(1): 103-110

[6] CrawfordC B, CampanellaR G. Comparison of field consolidation with laboratory and in situ tests [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1991, 28(1): 103-112

[7] Abu-FarsakhM, YuX. Comparison of predicted embankment settlement from piezocone penetration test with field measurement and laboratory estimated [M]. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization London, 2013, London, Taylor & Francis Group: 350-355

[8] LiuS, CaiG, PuppalaA J, TuQ. Prediction of embankment settlements over marine clay using piezocone penetration tests [J]. Bulletin Engineering Geology Environment, 2011, 70(3): 401-409

[9] PuzrinA M, AlonsoE E, PinyoN MGeomechanics of failures [M], 2010, New York, Springer

[10] CraigR FCraig’s soil mechanics [M], 20047th EdLondon, Spon Press: 256-257

[11] HightD W, BoeseR, ButcherA P, ClaytonC R I, SmithP R. Disturbance of the Bothkennar clay prior to laboratory testing [J]. Geotechnique, 1992, 42(20): 199-217

[12] NashD F T, PowellJ J M, LloydI M. Initial investigations of the soft clay test site at Bothkennar [J]. Geotechnique, 1992, 42(2): 163-181

[13] PittsJ. A review of geology and engineering geology in Singapore [J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 1984, 17: 93-101

[14] RoweP W, BardenE M. A new consolidation cell [J]. Geotechnique, 1966, 16(2): 162-170

[15] ASTM D2435-02.Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils [S], 2003

[16] ASTM D4186-89.Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using controlled-strain loading [S], 2003

[17] BS 1377-5.Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes-Compressibility, permeability and durability tests [S], 1990

[18] BS 1377-6.Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes-Consolidation and permeability tests in hydraulic cells and with pore pressure measurement [S], 1990

[19] DixonN, JonesD R V. Engineering properties of municipal solid waste [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2005, 23(3): 205-233

[20] ZengX, NiB. Stress-induced anisotropic Gmax of sands and its measurement [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999, 125(9): 741-749

[21] TerzaghiKTheoretical soil mechanics [M], 1943, New York, John Wiley & Sons: 285-290