Optimal scenario balance of reduction in costs and greenhouse gas emissions for municipal solid waste management

Abstract

To reduce carbon intensity, an improved management method balancing the reduction in costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is required for Tianjin’s waste management system. Firstly, six objective functions, namely, cost minimization, GHG minimization, eco-efficiency minimization, cost maximization, GHG maximization and eco-efficiency maximization, are built and subjected to the same constraints with each objective function corresponding to one scenario. Secondly, GHG emissions and costs are derived from the waste flow of each scenario. Thirdly, the range of GHG emissions and costs of other potential scenarios are obtained and plotted through adjusting waste flow with infinitely possible step sizes according to the correlation among the above six scenarios. And the optimal scenario is determined based on this range. The results suggest the following conclusions. 1) The scenarios located on the border between scenario cost minimization and GHG minimization create an optimum curve, and scenario GHG minimization has the smallest eco-efficiency on the curve; 2) Simple pursuit of eco-efficiency minimization using fractional programming may be unreasonable; 3) Balancing GHG emissions from incineration and landfills benefits Tianjin’s waste management system as it reduces GHG emissions and costs.

Keywords

fractional programming / greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions / eco-efficiency / waste management

References

[1] The twelfth-five-year greenhouse gases mitigation and energy saving plan [OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-08/21/content_2207867.htm. (in Chinese)

[2] EgglestonH S, BuendiaL, MiwaK, NgaraT, TanabeK2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme [M], 2006, Japan, IGES

[3] YuanX-f, WenB-t, MaX-g, ZhuW-b, WangX-f, ChenS-j, CuiZ-jun. Enhancing the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulose of municipal solid waste using a microbial pretreatment method [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 154: 1-9

[4] ZhangH-y, SchuchardtcF, LiG-x, YangJ-b, YangQ-yuan. Emission of volatile sulfur compounds during composting of municipal solid waste (MSW) [J]. Waste Management, 2013, 33(4): 957-963

[5] ChengH-f, ZhangY-g, MengA-h, LiQ-hai. Municipal solid waste fueled power generation in China: A case study of waste-to-energy in Changchun city [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(21): 7509-7515

[6] MadlenerR, AntunesC H, DiasL C. Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197(3): 1084-1094

[7] ChangN B, WangS F. A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 99(2): 303-321

[8] ChangN B, WenC G, ChenY L. A fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for optimal management of the reservoir watershed [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 99(2): 289-302

[9] LuH W, HuangG H, HeL, ZengG M. An inexact dynamic optimization model for municipal solid waste management in association with greenhouse gas emission control [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(1): 396-409

[10] SuJ, XiB-d, LiuH-l, JiangY-h, WarithM A. An inexact multi-objective dynamic model and its application in China for the management of municipal solid waste [J]. Waste Management, 2008, 28(12): 2532-2541

[11] ZhuH, HuangG H. SLFP: A stochastic linear fractional programming approach for sustainable waste management [J]. Waste Management, 2011, 31(12): 2612-2619

[12] ChangN B, QiC, IslamK, HossainF. Comparisons between global warming potential and cost-benefit criteria for optimal planning of a municipal solid waste management system [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 20(1): 1-13

[13] ZhaoW, HuppesG, van der VoetE. Eco-efficiency for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation of municipal solid waste management: A case study of Tianjin, China [J]. Waste Management, 2011, 31(6): 1407-1415

[14] The twelfth 5-year-plan of waste treatment facilities in Tianjin [OL]. http://www.tjhb.gov.cn/program_and_plan/the_relevant_plan/201410/t20141022_1980.html. (in Chinese)

[15] MA Xiao-peng. The sythetical evalution of waste disposal techniques and the waste logistics allocation optimization study in Beijing [M]. 1st ed. Beijing: Tsinghua Universtiy Press. (in Chinese)

[16] ZhaoW, van der VoetE, ZhangY-f, HuppesG. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: Case study of Tianjin, China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407(5): 1517-1526

[17] Investigation on municipal solid waste in Tianjin [OL]. http://www.chinaenvironment.com/view/viewnews.aspx?k=20080602113045567. (in Chinese)

[18] National Bureau of Statistics of China.China energy statistical yearbook 2000–2002 [M], 20021st ed.Beijing, China Statistics Press

[19] TianB-g, SiJ-t, ZhaoY, WangH-t, HaoJ-ming. Approach of technical decision-making by element flow analysis and Monte-Carlo simulation of municipal solid waste stream [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 19(5): 633-640