Dynamic test on waste heat recovery system with organic Rankine cycle

Zhi-qi Wang , Li-wen Liu , Xiao-xia Xia , Nai-jun Zhou

Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (12) : 4607 -4612.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (12) : 4607 -4612. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-2467-5
Article

Dynamic test on waste heat recovery system with organic Rankine cycle

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Dynamic performance is important to the controlling and monitoring of the organic Rankine cycle(ORC) system so to avoid the occurrence of unwanted conditions. A small scale waste heat recovery system with organic Rankine cycle was constructed and the dynamic behavior was presented. In the dynamic test, the pump was stopped and then started. In addition, there was a step change of the flue gas volume flow rate and the converter frequency of multistage pump, respectively. The results indicate that the working fluid flow rate has the shortest response time, followed by the expander inlet pressure and the expander inlet temperature. The operation frequency of pump is a key parameter for the ORC system. Due to a step change of pump frequency (39.49–35.24 Hz), the expander efficiency and thermal efficiency drop by 16% and 21% within 2 min, respectively. Besides, the saturated mixture can lead to an increase of the expander rotation speed.

Keywords

organic Rankine cycle / waste heat recovery / dynamic performance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhi-qi Wang, Li-wen Liu, Xiao-xia Xia, Nai-jun Zhou. Dynamic test on waste heat recovery system with organic Rankine cycle. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(12): 4607-4612 DOI:10.1007/s11771-014-2467-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

HungT C, WangS K, KuoC H, PeiB S, TsaiK F. A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an ORC using low-grade energy sources [J]. Energy, 2010, 35(3): 1403-1411

[2]

LiuB, ChienK, WangC. Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery [J]. Energy, 2004, 29(8): 1207-1217

[3]

RoyJ P, MishraM K, MisraA. Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using organic Rankine cycle [J]. Energy, 2010, 35(12): 5049-5062

[4]

TchancheB F, PapadakisG, LambrinosG, FrangoudakisA. Fluid selection for a low-temperature solar organic Rankine cycle [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(11): 2468-2476

[5]

LakewA A, BollandO. Working fluids for low-temperature heat source [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(10): 1262-1268

[6]

ChysM M, BroekV D, VanslambrouckB, PaepeM D. Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles [J]. Energy, 2012, 44(1): 623-632

[7]

HeberleF, PreißingerM, BrüggemannD. Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources [J]. Renewable Energy, 2012, 37(1): 364-370

[8]

SunJ, LiW H, ReddyA. Operation optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) heat recovery power plant [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(11): 2032-2041

[9]

ZhangS J, WangH X, GuoT. Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation [J]. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(8): 2740-2754

[10]

WangZ-q, ZhouN-j, ZhangJ-q, GuoJ, WangX-yuan. Parametric optimization and performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle with simulated annealing algorithm [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(9): 2584-2590

[11]

WeiD H, LuX S, LuZ, GuJ M. Dynamic modeling and simulation of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for waste heat recovery [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(10): 1216-1224

[12]

ZhangJ H, ZhangW F, HouG L, FangF. Dynamic modeling and multivariable control of organic Rankine cycles in waste heat utilizing processes [J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2012, 64(5): 908-921

[13]

QuoilinS, AumannR, GrillA, SchusterA. Dynamic modeling and optimal control strategy of waste heat recovery organic Rankine cycles [J]. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(6): 2183-2190

[14]

QuoilinS, LemortV, LebrunJ. Experimental study and modeling of an organic Rankine cycle using scroll expander [J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(4): 1260-1268

[15]

TwomeyB, JacobsP A, GurgenciH. Dynamic performance estimation of small-scale solar cogeneration with an organic Rankine cycle using a scroll expander [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 51: 1307-1316

[16]

YamamotoT, FuruhataT, AraiN. Design and testing of the organic Rankine cycle [J]. Energy, 2001, 26: 239-251

[17]

ZhangX R, YamaguchiH, UnenoD. Experimental study on the performance of solar Rankine system using supercritical CO2 [J]. Renewable Energy, 2007, 32(15): 2617-2628

[18]

ManolakosaD, KosmadakisS, KyritsisaS, PapadakisaG. On site experimental evaluation of a low-temperature solar organic Rankine cycle system for RO desalination [J]. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(5): 646-656

[19]

KangS H. Design and experimental study of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and radial turbine using R245fa working fluid [J]. Energy, 2012, 41(1): 514-524

[20]

QiuG Q, ShaoY J, LiJ X, LiuH, RiffatS B. Experimental investigation of a biomass-fired ORC-based micro-CHP for domestic applications [J]. Fuel, 2012, 96: 374-382

[21]

PeiG, LiJ, LiY. Construction and dynamic test of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle [J]. Energy, 2011, 36(5): 3215-3223

[22]

LiJ, PeiG, LiY Z, JiJ. Evaluation of external heat loss from a small-scale expander used in organic Rankine cycle [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(15): 2694-2701

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

90

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/