Effects of Al and Sn on electrochemical properties of Mg-6%Al-1%Sn (mass fraction) magnesium alloy as anode in 3.5%NaCl solution

Abstract

Mg-6%Al-1%Sn (mass fraction) alloy is a newly developed anode material for seawater activated batteries. The electrochemical properties of Mg-1%Sn, Mg-6%Al and Mg-6%Al-1%Sn alloys are measured by galvanostatic and potentiodynamic tests. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) is used to characterize the microstructures of the experimental alloys. The results show that the Mg-6%Al-1%Sn alloy obtains more negative discharge potential (−1.38 V (vs SCE)) in hot-rolled condition. This is attributed to the fine dynamically recrystallized grains during the hot rolling process. After the experimental alloys are annealed at 473 K for 1 h, the discharge potentials of Mg-6%Al-1%Sn alloy are more negative than those of Mg-6%Al alloy under different current densities. After annealing at 673 K, the discharge potentials of Mg-6%Al-1%Sn alloy become more positive than those of Mg-6%Al alloy. Such phenomenon is due to the coarse grains and the second phase Mg₂Sn. The discharge potentials of Mg-1%Sn shift positively obviously in the discharge process compared with Mg-6%Al-1%Sn alloy. This is due to the corrosion products pasting on the discharge surface, which leads to anode polarization.

Keywords

magnesium alloy / electrochemical properties / polarization / anodic dissolution

References

[1] FengY, WangR-c, PengC-q, WangN-guang. Influences of Mg₂₁Ga₅Hg₃ compound on electrochemical properties of Mg-5%Hg-5%Ga alloy [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2009, 19: 154-159

[2] DoronA, GurukarS S, ElenaL, ArielM, OrenM, Oritc, MichelaB. Progress in rechargeable magnesium battery technology [J]. Advanced Materials, 2007, 19: 4260-4267

[3] ShinoharaM, ArakibE, MochizukicM. Practical application of a sea-water battery in deep-sea basin and its performance [J]. Power Source, 2009, 187: 253-260

[4] WilcockW S D, KauffmanP C. Development of a seawater battery for deepwater applications [J]. Power Source, 1997, 66: 71-75

[5] RenukaR. AgCl and Ag₂S as additive to CuI in Mg-CuI seawater activated batteries [J]. Corrosion Science, 2011, 53: 2035-2040

[6] YuK, TanX, HuY, ChenF, LiS. Microstructure effects on the electrochemical corrosion properties of Mg-4.1%Ga-2.2%Hg alloy as the anode for seawater-activated batteries [J]. Corrosion Science, 2011, 53: 2035-2040

[7] WangN-g, WangR-c, PengC-c, FengY, ChenBin. Effect of hot rolling and subsequent annealing on electrochemical discharge behavior of AP65 magnesium alloy as anode for seawater activated battery [J]. Corrosion Science, 2012, 64: 17-27

[8] LiuL J, SchlesingerM. Corrosion of magnesium and its alloys [J]. Corrosion Science, 2009, 51: 1733-1737

[9] VenkatesaraR K. Performance evaluation of Mg-AgCl batteries for under water propulsion [J]. Denfence Science, 2001, 5: 161-170

[10] GuangL S, AndrejA. Corrosion mechanisms of magnesium alloys [J]. Advance Engineering Materials, 1999, 1(1): 11-33

[11] JonssonM, ThierryD, BozecN L. The influence of microstructure on the corrosion behavior of AZ91D studies by scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy and scanning Kelvin probe [J]. Corrosion Science, 2006, 48: 1193-1208

[12] MerinoM C, PardoA, ArrabalR, MerinoS, CasajusP, MohedanoM. Influence of chloride ion concentration and temperature on the corrosion of Mg-Al alloys in salt fog [J]. Corrosion Science, 2010, 52: 589-594

[13] ZhaoJ, YuK, HuY-a, LiS-j, TanX, ChenF-w, YuZ-ming. Discharge behavior of Mg-4Ga-2Hg alloy as anode for seawater activated battery [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2011, 56: 8224-8231

[14] WangN-g, WangR-c, PengC-q, FengY, ZhangX-yu. Corrosion behavior of Mg-Al-Pb and Mg-Al-Pb-Zn-Mn alloys in 3.5%NaCl solution [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2010, 20: 1936-1934

[15] KondohK, ElsayedA, ImaiH, UmedaJ, JonesT. Microstructures and mechanical responses of powder metallurgy non-combustive magnesium extruded alloy by rapid solidification process in mass production [J]. Material Design, 2010, 31: 1540-1546