Effects of behavioral characteristics of taxi drivers on safety and capacity of signalized intersections

Abstract

Comparative analyses were conducted to compare the effects of the behavioral characteristics of the drivers of taxis and private cars on the capacity and safety of signalized intersections. Data were collected at sixteen signalized intersections in the Nanjing area in China. The risk-taking behaviors of the drivers of taxis and private cars were compared. The results suggest that 19.9% of taxi drivers have committed at least one of the identified risky behaviors, which is 2.37 times as high as that of the drivers of private cars (8.4%). The traffic conflicts technique was used to estimate the safety effects of taxis and private cars. The overall conflict rate for taxis is 21.4% higher than that for private cars, implying that taxis are more likely to be involved in conflicts. Almost all of the identified traffic conflicts can be attributed to certain levels of risk-taking behaviors committed by either taxi drivers or the drivers of private cars, and taxi drivers are more likely to be at fault in a conflict. Failure to yield to right-of-way and improper lane change is the leading causes of the conflicts in which taxis are at-fault. The research team further studied the effects of taxis on the queue discharge characteristics at signalized intersections. The results show that the presence of taxis significantly reduces both start-up lost time and saturation headways. The effects of taxis on saturation flow rates are dependent on the proportion of taxis in the discharge flow, and the saturation flow rates increase with the increase in the proportion of taxis. The adjustment factors for various proportions of taxis for different turning movements are then calculated to quantitatively evaluate the effects of taxis on the capacity of signalized intersections.

Keywords

taxi / private car / safety / capacity / signalized intersection

References

[1] SHANGHAI STATISTICS BUREAU. Shanghai statistical yearbook [DB/OL]. http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/tjnj/nj11.htm?d1=2011tjnj/C1013.htm. (in Chinese)

[2] LuX-ming. The fifth travel survey of residents in shanghai and characteristics analysis [J]. Urban Transport of China, 2011, 9(5): 1-7

[3] BurnsP C, WildeG J S. Risk taking in male taxi drivers: Relationships among personality, observational data, and driver records [J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 1995, 18(2): 267-278

[4] ChinH C, HuangH-lai. Safety assessment of taxi drivers in Singapore [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2009, 2144: 47-56

[5] GoliasJ C. Examining sensitivity of impact of taxi traffic on capacity and delays at urban road sections [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2003, 129(3): 286-291

[6] RahmanM M, HasanT, NakamuraF. Development of professional driver adjustment factors for the capacity analysis of signalized intersections [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2008, 134(12): 532-536

[7] FernandezW G, ParkJ L, OlshakerJ. An observational study of safety belt use among taxi drivers in Boston [J]. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2005, 45(6): 626-629

[8] RosenbloomT, ShaharA. Differences between taxi and nonprofessional male drivers in attitudes towards traffic-violation penalties [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 2007, 10(5): 428-435

[9] PeltzerK, RennerW. Superstition, risk taking, and risk perception of accidents among South African taxi drivers [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2003, 35(4): 619-623

[10] BotesG. A systemic study of the attitudes of minibus taxi drivers towards traffic law enforcement as a basis for the formulation of a management system for the South African minibus taxi industry [J]. Dissertation Abstracts International Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 1997, 58: 3B

[11] LamL T. Environmental factors associated with crash-related mortality and injury among taxi drivers in New South Wales, Australia [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2004, 36(5): 905-908

[12] MaagU, VanasseC, DionneG, Laberge-nadeauC. Taxi drivers’ accidents: How binocular vision problems are related to their rate and severity in terms of the number of victims [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1997, 29(2): 217-224

[13] MallahM T. Development of a conflict rate prediction model at unsignalized intersections [D]. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering College of Engineering, University of South Florida, 2003

[14] PirincciogluF, LuJ, PerniaJ C. Safety evaluation of right turn followed by U-turn at a signalized intersection as an alternative to direct left turn from driveways [J]. Advances in Transportation Studies, 2006, 8(B): 71-79

[15] LiuP, YuH, WangW, MaJ-h, WangS-chun. Evaluating the effects of signal countdown timers on queue discharge characteristics at signalized intersections in China [C]. Proceeding of Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 20121-16

[16] YangZ, LiuP, TianZ-z, WangWei. Evaluating the operational impacts of left-turn waiting areas at signalized intersections in China [C]. Proceeding of Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2012350-361

[17] Transportation Research Board.Highway capacity manual [M], 2010, Washington, D.C, National Research Council: 10-12

[18] LiuP, WanJ-j, WangW, LiZ-bin. Evaluating the impacts of unconventional outside left-turn lane design on traffic operations at signalized intersections [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2011, 2257: 62-70

[19] KockelmanK M, ShabihR A. Effect of light-duty trucks on the capacity of signalized intersections [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2000, 126(6): 506-512

[20] LiuP, LuJ, FanJ-j, PerniaJ, SokolowG. Effects of U-turns on capacities of signalized intersections [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2005, 1920: 74-80

[21] ParkerM R, ZeegerC V. Traffic conflict technique for safety and operation engineers guide [R]. Report FHWA-IP-88-026, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1989