Passive control of along-wind response of tall building

Young-moon Kim , Ki-pyo You , Jang-youl You

Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10) : 4002 -4006.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10) : 4002 -4006. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-2388-3
Article

Passive control of along-wind response of tall building

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Most of modern tall buildings using lighter construction materials with high strength and less stiffness are more flexible, which occurs excessive wind-induced vibration, resulting in occupant discomfort and structural unsafety. It is necessary to predict wind-induced vibration response and find out a method to mitigate such an excessive wind-induced vibration at the preliminary design stage. Recently, many studies have been conducted in using actuator control force based on the linear quadratic optimum control algorithm. It was accepted as a common knowledge that the performance of passive tuned mass damper (TMD) could increase by incorporating a feedback active control force in the design of TMD, which is called active tuned mass damper (ATMD). However, the fact that ATMD is superior to TMD to reduce wind-induced vibration of a tall building is still a question. The effectiveness of TMD for mitigating the along-wind vibration of a tall building was investigated. Optimum parameters of tuning frequency and damping ratio for TMD under a random load which has a white noise spectra were used. Fluctuating along-wind load acting on a tall building treated as a stationary Gaussian random process was simulated numerically using the along-wind load spectra. And using this simulated along-wind load, along-wind responses of a tall building with and without TMD were calculated and the effectiveness of TMD in mitigating the along-wind response of a tall building was found out.

Keywords

tuned mass damper (TMD) / along-wind vibration / tall building

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Young-moon Kim, Ki-pyo You, Jang-youl You. Passive control of along-wind response of tall building. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(10): 4002-4006 DOI:10.1007/s11771-014-2388-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

DavenportA G. Gust loading factors [J]. J Struct Div ASCE 93, No.ST 3, 196711-34

[2]

VickeryB J. Drag or along-wind response of slender structures [J]. J Struct Div ASCE 98, No ST1, 197221-36

[3]

SimiuE. Wind spectra and dynamic alongwind response [J]. J Struct Div ASCE 100, No ST9, 19741897-1910

[4]

SimiuE, ScanlanR HWind effects on structures [M], 19963rd EditionNew York, John Wiley & Sons: 327-356

[5]

DenH J PMechanical vibration [M], 1947, New York, McGraw-Hill: 93-106

[6]

McnamaraR J. Tuned mass dampers for buildings [J]. J Struct Div ASCE, 1977, 103: 1785-1798

[7]

HousnerG W, BergmanL A, CaugheyT K, ChassiakosA G, ClausR O, MasriS F, SkeltonR E, SoongT T, SpencerB F, YaoJ T P. Structural control: Past, present, and future [J]. Journal of Eng Mech ASCE, 1997, 123(9): 897-971

[8]

SoongT T. Active structural control in civil engineering [J]. Journal of Engineering Structure, 1998, 10: 74-84

[9]

DoratoP, AbdallahC, CeroneV. Linear-quadratic control [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 19959-35

[10]

SkogestadS, PostelthwaiteIMultivariavle feedback control analysis and design [M], 2001

[11]

LewisF L, VrabieD L, SyrmosV LOptimal control [M], 20123rd. edNew York, John Wiley & Sons

[12]

YaoJ T P. Concept of structural control [J]. Journal of SD, ASCE, 1972, 98: 1567-1574

[13]

ChangJ C H, SoongT T. Structural control using active tuned mass dampers [J]. Journal of Engineering. Mech Div ASCE, 1980, 106: 1091-1098

[14]

SuhardjoJ, SpencerB FJr, KareemA. Active control of wind-excited buildings: A frequency domain based design approach [J]. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 19921985-1996

[15]

AnkireddiS, YangH T Y. Simple ATMD control methodology for tall buildings subject to wind loads [J]. J Struct Engng ASCE, 1996, 122: 83-91

[16]

AnkireddiS, YangH T Y. Multiple objective LQG control of wind-excited buildings [J]. J Struct Engng ASCE, 1997, 123: 943-951

[17]

RicciardelliF, PizzimentiA D, MatteiM. Passive and active mass damper control of the response of tall buildings to wind gustiness [J]. J Engng Struct, 2003, 25: 1199-1209

[18]

YangJ N, LinS, KimJ H, AgrawalA K. Optimal design of passive energy dissipation systems based on H and H2 performances [J]. J Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn, 2002, 31: 921-936

[19]

YangJ N, LinS, JabbariF. H2-based control strategies for civil engineering structures [J]. J Struct Control, 2003, 10: 205-230

[20]

StavroulakisG E, MarinovaD G, HadjigeorgiouE, FoutsitziG, BantiotopoulosC C. Robust active control against wind-induced structural vibrations [J]. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2006, 94: 895-907

[21]

SolariG. Gust buffeting 2: Dynamic alongwind response [J]. Jour of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1993, 119(2): 383-398

[22]

DeodatisG. Simulation of ergodic multivariate stochastic processes [J]. Jour of Engng Mech Div ASCE, 1996, 122: 778-787

[23]

SchuellerG I, ShinozukaMStochastic methods in structural dynamics [M], 1987, Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: 93-133

[24]

AyoringdeE O, WarburtonG BMinimizing structural vibrations with absorbers [M], 1980, New York, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics: 219-236

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

116

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/