Influence of heavy metal stress on morphology and physiology of Penicillium chrysogenum during bioleaching process

Xin-hui Deng , Li-yuan Chai , Zhi-hui Yang , Yang-yang Wang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (8) : 3254 -3262.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (8) : 3254 -3262. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-2298-4
Article

Influence of heavy metal stress on morphology and physiology of Penicillium chrysogenum during bioleaching process

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In order to improve the efficiency of bioleaching heavy metal from the contaminated soil using Penicillium chrysogenum (P. chrysogenum), experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of heavy metal stress on P. chrysogenum during bioleaching. The morphology and physiology of P. chrysogenum were observed. Assuming that the heavy metals are all leached out from the experiment soil, heavy metals are added into the agar medium by simulating the heavy metal content in the soil. It is concluded that the survivable heavy metal contaminated soil mass range for P. chrysogenum is 2.5–5.0 g. As for biomass determination, the contaminated soil is added into the liquid medium directly. The soil mass that P. chrysogenum can be survivable is in the range of 2.5–8.75 g. In this mass range, the biomass of P. chrysogenum is bigger than that of the control sample. 10 g soil mass is the threshold of the growth of P. chrysogenum. 102.2 mg/L gluconic acid, 156.4 mg/L oxalic acid, 191.6 mg/L pyruvic acid, 0.02 mg/L citric acid, 0.03 mg/L malic acid and 70.6 mg/L succinic acid are determined after 15 d bioleaching. The mycelium is broken into fragments, and heavy metals are adsorbed on the cell wall or transported into the cytoplasm during bioleaching. The GOD activity declines from 1.08 U/mL to 0.2 U/mL under 400 mg/L of multi-metal stress. The influence of Pb on GOD activity is bigger than that of Cr and Cd, and the GOD activity is not influenced apparently by Mn, Zn and Cu.

Keywords

Penicillium chrysogenum / heavy metal stress / bioleaching / morphology / physiology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xin-hui Deng, Li-yuan Chai, Zhi-hui Yang, Yang-yang Wang. Influence of heavy metal stress on morphology and physiology of Penicillium chrysogenum during bioleaching process. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(8): 3254-3262 DOI:10.1007/s11771-014-2298-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

UlyN, WalterM V G, CorR, AngelP, JosephJ H. A metabolome study of the steady-state relation between central metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis and penicillin production in Penicillium chrysogenum [J]. Metabolic Engineering, 2008, 10: 10-23

[2]

YuanJ-q, LiuY-h, GengJun. Stoichiometric balance based macrokinetic model for Penicillium chrysogenum in fed-batch fermentation [J]. Process Biochemistr, 2010, 45: 542-548

[3]

SarabjeetS A, DineshG. Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98: 2243-2257

[4]

GeraldineS, AlainM, LorenzoS, RouxJ C. Structural determination of Zn and Pb binding sites in Penicillium chrysogenum cell walls by EXAFS spectroscopy [J]. Environment Science Technology, 1998, 32: 1648-1655

[5]

NagendranR, NareshK R. Changes in nutrient profile of soil subjected to bioleaching for removal of heavy metals using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 156: 102-107

[6]

ZhaoL, ZhuN-w, WangX-hui. Comparison of bio-dissolution of spent Ni-Cd batteries by sewage sludge using ferrous ions and elemental sulfur as substrate [J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 70: 974-98

[7]

MulliganC N, CloutierR G. Bioremediation of metal contamination [J]. Environment Monitor Assessment, 2003, 84: 45-60

[8]

AmiriF, YaghmaeiS, MousaviS M. Bioleaching of tungsten-rich spent hydrocracking catalyst using Penicillium simplicissimum [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102: 1567-73

[9]

DengX-h, ChaiL-y, YangZ-hui. Bioleaching of heavy metals from a contaminated soil using indigenous Penicillium chrysogenum strain F1 [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 30: 233-234

[10]

WangJ-l, ChenCan. Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future [J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2009, 27: 195-226

[11]

DengX-h, YangZ-h, ChaiL-y, ShiY, TongH-x, WangZ-xin. Preliminary bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated soil employing indigenous Penicillium Chrysogenum strain F1 [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2012, 19: 1973-1979

[12]

XuT-j, TingY-peng. Fungal bioleaching of incineration fly ash: Metal extraction and modeling growth kinetics [J]. Enzyme Microbiology Technology, 2009, 44: 323-328

[13]

CatherineN M, MahtabK, BernaF G. Bioleaching of heavy metals from a low-grade mining ore using Aspergillus niger [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, 110: 77-84

[14]

AnahidS, YaghmaeiaS, GhobadinejadZ. Heavy metal tolerance of fungi [J]. Sharif University of Technology, 2011, 18: 502-508

[15]

SandipB B, MaheshV B, RekhaS S, LaxmiA. Glucose oxidase-An overview [J]. Biotechnology Advance, 2009, 27: 489-501

[16]

RadmanR, BuckeC, KeshavarzT. Elicitor effects on Penicillium chrysogenum morphology in submerged cultures [J]. Biotechnology Appllied Biochemistry, 2004, 40: 229-233

[17]

GarciaM, LopezM J, EstrellaF S, MorenoJ. Compost as a source of microbial isolates for the bioremediation of heavy metals: In vitro selection [J]. Science Total Environment, 2012, 431: 62-67

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

205

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/