Development of control strategy of variable speed limits for improving traffic operations at freeway bottlenecks

Abstract

A control strategy of variable speed limits (VSL) was developed to reduce the travel time at freeway recurrent bottleneck areas. The proposed control strategy particularly focused on preventing the capacity drop and increasing the discharge flow. A cell transmission model (CTM) was developed to evaluate the effects of the proposed VSL control strategy on the traffic operations. The results show that the total travel time is reduced by 25.5% and the delay is reduced by 56.1%. The average travel speed is increased by 34.3% and the queue length is reduced by 31.0%. The traffic operation is improved by the proposed VSL control strategy. The way to use the proposed VSL control strategy in different types of freeway bottlenecks was also discussed by considering different traffic flow characteristics. It is concluded that the VSL control strategy is effective for merge bottlenecks but is less effective for diverge bottlenecks.

Keywords

variable speed limit / traffic operation / freeway bottleneck / capacity drop / efficiency

References

[1] HegyiA, BartS D, HellendoornJ P. Optimal coordination of variable speed limits to suppress shock waves [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005, 6(1): 102-112

[2] HegyiA, HoogendoornS P, SchreuderM, StoelhorstH, VitiF. SPECIALIST: A dynamic speed limit control algorithm based on shock wave theory [C]. Proc 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Beijing, China, 2008827-832

[3] HegyiA, HoogendoornS P, SchreuderM, StoelhorstH. The expected effectively of the dynamic speed limit algorithm SPECIALIST — A field data evaluation method [C]. Proc the European Control Conference. Budapest, Hungary, 20091770-1775

[4] HegyiA, HoogendoornS P. Dynamic speed limit control to resolve shock waves on freeways: Field test results of the SPECIALIST algorithm [C]. Proc 13th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Madeira Island, Portugal, 2010519-524

[5] PopovA, HegyiA, BabuskaR, WernerH. Distributed controller design approach to dynamic speed limit control against shockwaves on freeways [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2008, 2086: 93-99

[6] KangK P, ChangG L, ZouN. Optimal dynamic speed-limit control for highway work zone operations [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2004, 1877: 77-84

[7] KwonE, BrannanD, KwonE, ShoumanK, IsacksonC, ArseneauB. Development and field evaluation of variable advisory speed limit system for work zone [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2007, 2015: 12-18

[8] LinP W, KangK P, ChangG L. Exploring the effectiveness of variable speed limit controls on highway work-zone operations [J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2004, 8(3): 155-168

[9] CarlsonR C, PapamichailI, PapageorgiouM, MessmerA. Optimal motorway traffic flow control involving variable speed limits and ramp metering [J]. Transportation Science, 2010, 44(22): 238-253

[10] CarlsonR C, PapamichailI, PapageorgiouM, MessmerA. Variable speed limits as a mainline metering device for freeways [C]. Proc 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 20101-19

[11] LuX Y, VaraiyaP, HorowitzR, SuD, ShladoverS E. A new approach for combined freeway variable speed limits and coordinated ramp metering [C]. Proc 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Funchal, Portugal, 2010491-498

[12] LuX Y, VaraiyaP, HorowitzR, SuD, ShladoverS E. A novel freeway traffic control with variable speed limit and coordinated ramp metering [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2011, 2229: 55-65

[13] SuD, LuX Y, VaraiyaP, HorowitzR, ShladoverS E. Variable speed limit and ramp metering design for congestion caused by weaving [C]. Proc 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 20111-12

[14] HadiuzzamanM D, QiuT Z. Cell transmission model-based variable speed limit control for freeways [C]. Proc 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 20121-20

[15] CarlsonR C, PapamichailI, PapageorgiouM, MessmerA. Optimal mainstream traffic flow control of large-scale motorway networks [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2010, 18(2): 193-212

[16] CarlsonR C, PapamichailI, PapageorgiouM. Local feedback-based mainstream traffic flow control on motorways using variable speed limits [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011, 12(4): 1261-1276

[17] KernerB S. Empirical features of congested patterns at highway bottlenecks [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2002, 1802: 145-154

[18] CassidyM J. Freeway on-ramp metering, delay savings, and diverge bottleneck [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003, 1856: 1-5

[19] KimK, CassidyM J. A capacity-increasing mechanism in freeway traffic [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2012, 46: 1260-1272

[20] CassidyM J, RudjanakanoknadJ. Increasing the capacity of an isolated merge by metering its on-ramp [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2005, 39(10): 896-913

[21] BanksJ H. Two-capacity phenomenon at freeway bottlenecks: A basis for ramp metering [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1991, 1302: 83-90

[22] ChungK, RudjanakanoknadJ, CassidyM J. Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2007, 41(1): 82-95

[23] OhS, YeoH. Estimation of capacity drop in highway merging sections [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2012, 2286: 111-121

[24] BanksJ H. Flow breakdown at freeway bottlenecks: evidence from automated flow analysis [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2009, 2099: 14-21

[25] LavalJ A, DaganzoC F. Lane-changing in traffic streams [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2006, 40(3): 251-264

[26] LeclercqL, LavalJ A, ChiabautN. Capacity drops at merges: A endogenous model [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 17: 12-26

[27] OhS, YeoH. Microscopic analysis on the causal factors of capacity drop in highway merging sections [C]. Proc 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 20121-23

[28] DaganzoC F. The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1994, 28(4): 269-287

[29] GomesG, HorowitzR, KurzhanskiyA A. Behavior of the cell transmission model and effectiveness of ramp metering [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2008, 16(4): 485-513

[30] HadiuzzamanM D, QiuT Z. Cell transmission model based variable speed limit control for freeways [J]. Candian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 40(1): 46-56

[31] MuñozL, SunX, HorowitzR, AlvarezL. Piecewise-linearized cell transmission model and parameter calibration methodology [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2006, 1965: 183-191

[32] WangP, JonesL S, YangQun. A novel conditional cell transmission model for oversaturated arterials [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19: 1466-1471

[33] KimK, CassidyM J. On-Ramp metering and commuter delay: a before and after study [R]. California PATH Research Report, 2010, Berkeley, CA, USA, University of California

[34] KouvelasA, AboudolasK, KosmatopoulosE, PapageorgiouM. Adaptive performance optimization for large-scale traffic control systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011, 12(4): 1434-1445

[35] ZhengZ D, AhnS, MonsereC M. Impact of traffic oscillations on freeway crash occurrences [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(2): 626-636

[36] MunozJ C, DaganzoC F. The bottleneck mechanism of a freeway diverge [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2002, 36(6): 483-505

[37] QuX, GuoT-y, WangW, HuQ-zhou. Measuring speed consistency for freeway diverge areas using factor analysis [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20: 267-273