Influence of seismic input on response of Baihetan arch dam

Qiang Xu , Jian-yun Chen , Jing Li , Chun-feng Zhao

Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6) : 2437 -2443.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6) : 2437 -2443. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-2197-8
Article

Influence of seismic input on response of Baihetan arch dam

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The dynamic responses of the arch dam including dam-foundation-storage capacity of water system, using two different earthquake input models, i.e. viscous-spring artificial boundary (AB) condition and massless foundation (MF), were studied and analyzed for the 269 m high Baihetan arch dam under construction in China. By using different input models, the stress and opening of contraction joints (OCJs) of arch dam under strong shock were taken into consideration. The results show that the earthquake input models have slight influence on the responses including earthquake stresses and openings of contraction joints in different extents.

Keywords

seismic input / openings of contraction joints / massless foundation model / viscous-spring artificial boundary condition / arch dam

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qiang Xu, Jian-yun Chen, Jing Li, Chun-feng Zhao. Influence of seismic input on response of Baihetan arch dam. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(6): 2437-2443 DOI:10.1007/s11771-014-2197-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

WangS-w, BaoT-f, XuBo. Global safety evaluation of RCC arch dam under cracks [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(4): 1479-1486

[2]

SevimB, BayraktarA, AltunisikA C, AdanurS, AkköseM. Determination of water level effects on the dynamic characteristics of a prototype arch dam model using ambient vibration testing [J]. Experimental Techniques, 2012, 36(1): 72-82

[3]

ChenS H, WangG J, ZhouH, WangW M, ZouL C. Evaluation of excavation-induced relaxation and its application to an arch dam foundation [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2012, 36(2): 166-181

[4]

FangC-h, HanX, DuanY-h, FangB-qing. Analysis on dam-break case of concrete arch dam and forecast of failure scope based on point safety factor [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 28: 617-625

[5]

MataJ. Interpretation of concrete dam behaviour with artificial neural network and multiple linear regression models [J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(3): 903-910

[6]

FengJ, WeiH, PanJ-w, JianY, WangJ-t, ZhangC-han. Comparative study procedure for the safety evaluation of high arch dams [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(3): 306-317

[7]

WuS-y, ShenM-b, WangJian. Jinping hydropower project: main technical issues on engineering geology and rock mechanics [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2010, 69(3): 325-332

[8]

ZhongD-h, RenB-y, LiM-c, WuB-p, LiM-chuan. Theory on real-time control of construction quality and progress and its application to high arc dam [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53(10): 2611-2618

[9]

HamidrezaA, VahidL. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of arch dams with joint sliding mechanism [J]. Mechanical & Materials Engineering, 2009, 26(5): 464-482

[10]

ZhangC-h, PanJ-w, WangJ-ting. Influence of seismic input mechanisms and radiation damping on arch dam response [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 29(9): 1282-1293

[11]

PierreL, MartinL. Hydrostatic, temperature, time-displacement model for concrete dams [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 133(3): 267-277

[12]

AlvesS W, HallJ F. Generation of spatially nonuniform ground motion for nonlinear analysis of a concrete arch dam [J]. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35(11): 1339-1357

[13]

AlvesS W, HallJ F. System identification of a concrete arch dam and calibration of its finite element model [J]. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35(11): 1321-1337

[14]

NiwaA, CloughR W. Non-linear seismic response of arch dams [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1982, 10(2): 267-281

[15]

DuX-l, ZhaoMi. A local time-domain transmitting boundary for simulating cylindrical elastic wave propagation in infinite media [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(10): 937-946

[16]

ZhangC-h, JinF, PekauO A. Time domain procedure of FE-BE-IBE coupling for seismic interaction of arch dams and canyon [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1995, 24: 1651-1666

[17]

DeeksA J, RandolphM F. Axisymmetric time-domain transmitting boundaries [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1994, 120(1): 25-42

[18]

LouM-l, WangH-f, ChenX, ZhaiY-mei. Structure-soil-structure interaction: Literature review [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(12): 1724-1731

[19]

PanJ-w, ZhangC-h, WangJ-t, XuY-jie. Seismic damage-cracking analysis of arch dams using different earthquake input mechanisms [J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(2): 518-529

[20]

ZhaoM, DuX-l, LiuJ-b, LiuHeng. Explicit finite element artificial boundary scheme for transient scalar waves in two-dimensional unbounded waveguide [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2011, 87(11): 1074-1104

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

117

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/