Slope analysis based on local strength reduction method and variable-modulus elasto-plastic model

Abstract

Employing an ideal elasto-plastic model, the typically used strength reduction method reduced the strength of all soil elements of a slope. Therefore, this method was called the global strength reduction method (GSRM). However, the deformation field obtained by GSRM could not reflect the real deformation of a slope when the slope became unstable. For most slopes, failure occurs once the strength of some regional soil is sufficiently weakened; thus, the local strength reduction method (LSRM) was proposed to analyze slope stability. In contrast with GSRM, LSRM only reduces the strength of local soil, while the strength of other soil remains unchanged. Therefore, deformation by LSRM is more reasonable than that by GSRM. In addition, the accuracy of the slope’s deformation depends on the constitutive model to a large degree, and the variable-modulus elasto-plastic model was thus adopted. This constitutive model was an improvement of the Duncan-Chang model, which modified soil’s deformation modulus according to stress level, and it thus better reflected the plastic feature of soil. Most importantly, the parameters of the variable-modulus elasto-plastic model could be determined through in-situ tests, and parameters determination by plate loading test and pressuremeter test were introduced. Therefore, it is easy to put this model into practice. Finally, LSRM and the variable-modulus elasto-plastic model were used to analyze Egongdai ancient landslide. Safety factor, deformation field, and optimal reinforcement measures for Egongdai ancient landslide were obtained based on the proposed method.

Keywords

slope stability / local strength reduction method / variable-modulus elasto-plastic model / in-situ test

References

[1] ZienkiewiczO C, HumphesonC, LewisR W. Associated and non-associated visco-plasticity and plasticity in soil mechanics [J]. Geotechnique, 1975, 25(4): 671-689

[2] DawsonE M, RothW H, DrescherA. Slope stability analysis by strength reduction [J]. Geotechnique, 1999, 49(6): 835-840

[3] GriffithsD V, LaneP A. Slope stability analysis by finite element [J]. Geotechnique, 1999, 49(3): 387-403

[4] ManzariM T, NourM A. Significance of soil dilatancy in slope stability analysis [J]. Journal of Geotchnique and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000, 126(1): 5-80

[5] SongE X. Finite element analysis of safety factor for soil structures [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1997, 19(2): 1-7

[6] LuanM T, WuY J, NianT K. A criterion for evaluating slope stability based on development of plastic zone by shear strength reduction FEM [J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2003, 23(3): 1-8

[7] LinH, CaoP, GongF Q, LiJ T, GuiY L. Directly searching method for slip plane and its influential factors based on critical state of slope [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2009, 16(1): 131-135

[8] ZhaoS Y, ZhengY R, ShiW M, WangJ L. Analysis of safety factor of slope stability by strength reduction FEM [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(3): 343-346

[9] ZhangL Y, ZhengY R, ZhaoS Y, ShiW M. The feasibility study of strength reduction method with FEM for calculating safety factors of soil slope stability [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 1: 21-27

[10] ZhengY R, ZhaoS Y. Application of strength reduction FEM to soil and rock slope [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(19): 3 381-3 388

[11] ZhaoS Y, ZhengY R, ZhangY F. Study on slope failure criterion in strength reduction finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(2): 332-336

[12] ChengY M, LansivaaraT, WeiW B. Two-dimensional slope stability analysis by limit equilibrium and strength reduction methods [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2007, 34: 137-150

[13] UgaiK, LeshchinskyD. Three-dimensional limit equilibrium and finite element analysis [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1995, 35(4): 1-7

[14] WeiW B, ChengY M, LiL. Three-dimensional slope failure analysis by the strength reduction and limit equilibrium methods [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36: 70-80

[15] YangG H. Nonlinear settlement computation of the soil foundation with the undisturbed soil tangent modulus method [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(11): 1 927-1 931

[16] YangG H, ZhangY C, ZhangY X. Variable modulus elastoplastic strength reduction method and its application to slope stability analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(7): 1 506-1 512

[17] DucanJ M, ChangC Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1970, 96(5): 1629-1653

[18] ZhengH, LiC G, LeeC F, GeX R. Finite element method for solving the factor of safety [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(5): 626-628

[19] WangZ, LuSq. Effects of variation of strength and deformation parameters on calculation results of FEM for soil engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(12): 1 892-1 894

[20] ZhangP W, ChenZ Y. Influences of soil elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio on slope stability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(2): 299-303

[21] YangG H. Hyperbola model for calculating the nonlinear settlement of foundation on granite residual soil [C]. Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on the Numerical Analysis and Analytical Method for Rock and Soil Mechanics, Dalian, China, 2001168-171

[22] YangG H. New computation method for soil foundation settlements [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(4): 679-686