PDF
Abstract
Based on the functional theory, catastrophe theory, simultaneity principle and the idea of strength reduction method (SRM), the bearing capacity functional and SRM of pile group foundation were established, and the criteria of ultimate load and the concept of safety storage coefficient (CSS) were advanced. The inclined ultimate loads by the static loading test, load increment method (LIM) and SRM are compared. Theoretically, the ultimate load of piles does not change with the loading levels when it is calculated by SRM. When the one strength reduction parameter is applied in the calculation boundary, there are calculating errors because the bearing capacity action of soils happened in the finite zone. The inclined loadings are 108, 132 and 144 kN, and SSC are 1.07, 0.94 and 0.79, respectively, so the calculation values of ultimate loads are about 115.56, 124.08 and 113.76 kN, respectively. The error between calculations and observation values is less than 6%. But the error between calculations of LIM and observations is 20%. Because of the effect of inclined loading, the push-rotation phenomenon of screw pile group appears. Under this testing, the ultimate bearing capacity of piles is mostly determined by the horizontal ultimate bearing capacity, and the effect of the vertical component of inclined load should also be considered.
Keywords
strength reduction method
/
screw pile group
/
ultimate load
/
inclined loading
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Tian-wen Dong, Ying-ren Zheng.
Limit analysis of vertical anti-pulling screw pile group under inclined loading on 3D elastic-plastic finite element strength reduction method.
Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(3): 1165-1175 DOI:10.1007/s11771-014-2050-0
| [1] |
ZienkiewiczO C, HumphesonC, LewisR W. Associated and nonassociated visco-plasticity and plasticity in soil mechanics [J]. Geotechnique, 1975, 25(4): 671-689
|
| [2] |
GriffithsD VRandolphM F. Finite element analyses of walls footings and slopes [C]. Symp Comp Appl Geotech Prob Highway Eng. Cambridge, 1980, UK, PM Geotech Analysts Ltd: 122-146
|
| [3] |
MatsuiT, SanK C. Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique [J]. Soils Found, 1992, 32(1): 59-70
|
| [4] |
UgaiK, LeshchinskyD. Three-dimensional limit equilibrium and finite element analysis: A comparison of result [J]. Soils Found, 1995, 35(4): 1-7
|
| [5] |
GriffithsD V, LaneP A. Slope stability analysis by finite elements [J]. Geotechnique, 1999, 49(3): 387-403
|
| [6] |
HullT S, PoulosH G. Discussion of design method for stabilization of slopes with piles [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999, 125(10): 910-914
|
| [7] |
CaiF, UgaiK. Numerical analysis of the stability of a slope reinforced with piles [J]. Japanese Geotechnical Society, 2000, 40(1): 73-84
|
| [8] |
ZhengY-r, ZhaoS-y, KongW-x, DengC-jian. Geotechnical engineering limit analysis using finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(1): 163-168
|
| [9] |
SchweigerH FBarlaG, BarlaM. Application of FEM to ULS design (Eurocodes) in surface and near surface geotechnical structures [C. Proc 11th Int Conf Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, 2005, Bologna, Patron Editore: 419-430
|
| [10] |
GriffithsD V, HangL, PingCao. A comparison of numerical algorithms in the analysis of pile reinforced slopes [C]. FRATTA D, Ed. Proc Geo Florida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design, 2010175-183
|
| [11] |
ZhengY-r, QiuC-y, ZhangH, WangQ-yuan. Exploration of stability analysis methods for surrounding rocks of soil tunnel [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(10): 1968-1980
|
| [12] |
RacanskyV, SchweigerH F, ThurnerR. FE-analysis of the behaviour of buttressed jet grouted retaining walls [C]. The 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics. Goa, India, 20083984-3992
|
| [13] |
PoulosH G. Analysis of piles in soil undergoing lateral movement [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1973, 99(5): 391-406
|
| [14] |
MendoncaA V, PaivaJ B. An elastostatic FEM/BEM analysis of vertically loaded raft and piled raft foundation [J]. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2003, 27(9): 919-933
|
| [15] |
BransbyM F, SpringmanS. Selection of load-transfer functions for passive lateral loading of pile groups [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1999, 24(3): 155-184
|
| [16] |
ComodromosE M, AnagnostopoulosC T, GeorgiadisM K. Numerical assessment of axial pile group response based on load test [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30(6): 505-515
|
| [17] |
JeongS, LeeJ, LeeC J. Slip elect at the pile-soil interface on drag load [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2004, 31(2): 115-126
|
| [18] |
HannaA, RahmanF, AyadatT. Passive earth pressure on embedded vertical plate anchors in sand [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2011, 6(1): 21-29
|
| [19] |
ARNOD V I. Catastrophe theory [M]. YAN Ha, Transl. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1990: 2–12. (in Chinese)
|
| [20] |
JGJ-94-94, technical code for building pile foundation [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1995. (in Chinese)
|
| [21] |
XuG-c, ZhengY-ren. Study on the application of yield criteria in the geotechnical engineering [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 12(2): 93-99
|
| [22] |
Liaoning ElectricReconnaissance Research.Testing and research of screw-anchor [R], 2002, Shenyang, Liaoning Electric and Reconnaissance Research
|
| [23] |
DongT-w, ZhangY-j, LiS-w, HungL-zhuang. Bearing capacity of screw pile group determined by inclined pull-out test [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(3): 429-433
|