Dynamic estimation and reliability control of quality assurance for bored piles

Abstract

A systematic method was proposed to estimate the occurrence probability of defective piles (OPDP) from a site according to quality assurance inspection. The OPDP was firstly suggested as the criterion to weight the performance of a pile foundation. Its prior distribution and updating distribution were deduced to follow Beta distributions. To calibrate the OPDP, a dynamic estimation model was established according to the relationships between prior mean and variance and updating mean and variance. Finally, a reliability-control method dealing with uncertainties arising from quality assurance inspection was formalized to judge whether all the bored piles from a site can be accepted. It is exemplified that the OPDP can be substantially improved when more definite prior information and sampling formation become available. For the example studied herein, the Bayesian estimator of updating variance for OPDP is reduced from 0.0037 to 0.0014 for the first inspection, from 0.0014 to 0.0009 for the second inspection, and with less uncertainty by incorporating experience information.

Keywords

bored piles / quality assurance inspection / reliability control / occurrence probability / Bayesian method

References

[1] CameronG. Quality assurance of bored pile foundations [J]. Ground Engineering, 2004, 37(2): 35-40

[2] LiD Q, TangW H, ZhangL M. Updating occurrence probability and size of defect for bored piles [J]. Structural Safety, 2008, 30(2): 130-143

[3] LiD Q, ZhangL M, TangW H. Reliability evaluation of cross-hole sonic logging for bored pile integrity [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geovironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(9): 1130-1137

[4] ZhangL M, LiD Q, TangW H. Impact of routine quality assurance on reliability of bored piles [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geovironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(5): 622-630

[5] O’NeillM W, SarhanH A. Structural resistance factors for drilled shafts considering construction flaws [C]. Current Practices and Future Trends in Deep Foundations, 2004, 125: 166-185

[6] Technical code for testing of building foundation piles, JGJ106-2003 [S].

[7] PreissK, ShapiroJ. Statistical consideration in pile testing [C]. Proceedings for the Mechanics of Soils. Stockholm, 19811335-1346

[8] ZhengJ-j, LiuY, GuoJ, XuZ-jun. Probabilistic analysis and reliability assessment for acceptance probability of foundation pile testing [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(11): 1660-1664

[9] GanY-chen. Current problems in quality qualifying control of pile foundation engineering and approach on stochastic control mode [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2004, 37(1): 84-91

[10] AngA H S, TangW HProbability concepts in engineering: emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering [M], 20062nd Ed.New York, John Wiley & Sons: 196-211

[11] XuZ-j, ZhengJ-j, BianX-y, ZhaoD-an. Probabilistic analysis of integrity inspection and dynamic evaluation of quality for piles [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(1): 151-157

[12] AmirJ M. Single-tube ultrasonic testing of pile integrity [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geovironmental Engineering, 2002, 116(2): 836-849

[13] ZhangL M, NgA M Y. Probabilistic limiting tolerable displacements for serviceability limit state design of foundation [J]. Geotechnique, 2005, 55(2): 151-161

[14] SivakumarB G L, RajaparthyS R. Reliability measures for buried flexible pipes [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(2): 541-549

[15] XuZ-junReliability analysis of bearing capacity and reliability-design optimization of piles [D], 2012, Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science & Technology