Bubble size as a function of some situational variables in mechanical flotation machines

Wei Zhang , Jan E. Nesset , James A. Finch

Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2) : 720 -727.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2014, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2) : 720 -727. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-1994-4
Article

Bubble size as a function of some situational variables in mechanical flotation machines

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The specific results of the work investigating the effect of gas density and water temperature on bubble size were present. These were surrogate variables designed to investigate the effect of viscosity (varying water temperature) and altitude (varying gas density). The results show that there is a measurable but relatively small effect of gas density on bubble size. The D32 is revealed to increase proportionally as (ρ0/ρg)0.132. The projected impact on flotation kinetics at 4500 m versus sea level is small, of the order of 0.5% recovery loss for a bank of eight flotation cells. The effect of water temperature (4–40 °C) on bubble size is more significant than gas density. The relationship correlates with water viscosity values quite closely. A finding that D32 increases proportionally as (µ/µ20)0.776 highlights the importance of accounting for viscosity effects if, for example, large process temperature fluctuations or deviation from design/test conditions are expected.

Keywords

flotation / frother / bubble size / viscosity / altitude

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei Zhang, Jan E. Nesset, James A. Finch. Bubble size as a function of some situational variables in mechanical flotation machines. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(2): 720-727 DOI:10.1007/s11771-014-1994-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

RaoS R, LejaJSurface chemistry of froth flotation [M], 20042nd EditionNew York/London, Kluwer Academic Publication/Plenum Publishers: 3-11

[2]

AhmedN, JamesonG J. The effect of bubble size on the rate of flotation of fine particles [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1985, 14(3): 195-215

[3]

DobbyG S, FinchJ A. Particle collection in columns: Gas rate and bubble size effects [J]. Canadian Metallurgy Quarterly, 1986, 25(1): 9-13

[4]

ZhangW, NessetJ E, FinchJ A. Water recovery and bubble surface area flux in flotation [J]. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 2010, 49(4): 353-362

[5]

ZhangW, ZhouX, FinchJ A. Determining independent control of dual-frother systems — gas holdup, bubble size and water overflow rate [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2012, 39: 106-116

[6]

LizamaH M, CarrionJ, EstrellaD. Improvements in column flotation through the use of microcel spargers at Antamina [C]. Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors (CIM). Ottawa, ON, 2008363-376

[7]

KrachtW, FinchJ A. Bubble break-up and the role of frother and salt [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2009, 92(3/4): 153-161

[8]

HuY-h, MengX-l, SunWei. A novel quantificational assessment method of frothers effect on bubble characteristics [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18: 1910-1916

[9]

HalesM L. The effect of altitude on aeration of a lab model Wemco smart Cell? flotation machine [R]. Baker Process, Baker Hughes Report, 1998

[10]

WilkinsonP M, van DierendonckL. Pressure and gas density effects on bubble break-up and gas hold-up in bubble columns [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1990, 45: 2309-2315

[11]

GomezC O, FinchJ A. Gas dispersion measurements in flotation cells [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2007, 84: 51-58

[12]

ZhangW, NessetJ E, RaoS R, FinchJ A. Characterizing frothers through critical coalescence concentration (CCC95)-hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) [J]. Minerals, 2012, 2(3): 208-227

[13]

ZhangW, KolahdoozanM, NessetJ E, FinchJ A. Use of frother with sampling-for-imaging bubble sizing technique [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2009, 22(5): 513-515

[14]

NessetJ E, FinchJ A, GomezC O. Operating variables affecting the bubble size in forced-air mechanical flotation machines [C]. Proceedings of Ninth Mill Operators’ Conference. Fremantle, WA, 200719-21

[15]

NessetJ E, ZhangW, FinchJ A. A benchmarking tool for assessing flotation cell performance [C]. Proceedings 2012-44th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors (CIM). Ottawa, ON, 2012183-209

[16]

DeglonD A, Egya-mensahD, FranzidisJ P. Review of hydrodynamics and gas dispersion in flotation cells on South African platinum concentrators [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2000, l13(3): 235-244

[17]

ARBITER N, STEININGER J. Mineral processing [M]. ROBERTS E. Ed. New York: Pergammon, 1965: 21–37.

[18]

NessetJ EModeling the Sauther mean bubble diameter in mechanical, forced-air flotation machines [D], 2011, Montreal, McGill University

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

154

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/