Influence of thinning on acidic deposition in Chinese fir plantations

Abstract

Acidic deposition, which is mainly caused by atmospheric pollution, is one of the global environmental problems. Thinning is an effective management to improve the tree productivity, reduce the wildfire risk and maintain a healthy forest. Since thinning may reduce the effect of acidic deposition, the effect of thinning on acidic deposition was estimated. The biomass, soil properties, pH value of runoff and groundwater in both unthinned and thinned Chinese fir plantations were measured and compared over a 5-year period (2–6 years after thinning). The results indicated that acidic deposition in the Huitong State Ecosystem Research Station was serious, and it got worse with time. Forest thinning resulted in a huge change in biomass and soil properties. During the 5-year monitoring period, biomasses of understory and litter, plant species richness, coverage of undergrowth plant layer were significantly higher in thinned site than in unthinned site. Moreover, higher soil fertility as well as lower amounts of runoff and groundwater were found in thinned site. It was suggested that thinning could improve the structure of forest, leading to restoring the effluent (runoff and groundwater) pH to the normal value.

Keywords

thinning / acidic deposition / Chinese fir / biomass / soil properties

References

[1] LarssenT, SeipH M, SembA, MulderJ, MunizI P, VogtR D, LydersenE, AngellV, TangD-g, EilertsenO. Acid deposition and its effects in China: An overview [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 1999, 2(1): 9-24

[2] DriscollC T, LawrenceG B, BulgerA J, ButlerT J, CronanC S, EagarC, LambertK F, LikensG E, StoddardJ L, WeathersK C. Acidic deposition in the northeastern united states: Sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies [J]. BioScience, 2001, 51(3): 180-198

[3] DriscollC T, DriscollK M, MitchellM J, RaynalD J. Effects of acidic deposition on forest and aquatic ecosystems in new york state [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2003, 123(3): 327-336

[4] WuZ-lunChinese fir [M], 1984, Beijing, China Forestry Press: 23-25

[5] FAO.Global forest resource assessment 2005 [M], 2006, Rome, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: 2-4

[6] WestPGrowing plantation forests [M], 2006, Germany, Springer: 121-135

[7] ChenC-y, ZhangJ-w, ZhouC-l, ZhengH-yuan. Researches on improving the quality of forest land and the productivity of artificial Cunninghamia lanceolata stands [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1990, 1(2): 97-106

[8] FangQi. Effect of Chinese fir successive cropping on soil fertility and tree growth [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1987, 23(4): 389-397

[9] MaS-y, ChenJ-q, NorthM, EricksonH E, BreseeM, MoineJ L. Short-term effects of experimental burning and thinning on soil respiration in an old-growth, mixed-conifer forest [J]. Environmental Management, 2004, 33(1): S148-S159

[10] TangJ-w, QiY, XuM, MissonL, GoldsteinA H. Forest thinning and soil respiration in a ponderosa pine plantation in the sierra nevada [J]. Tree Physiology, 2005, 25(1): 57-66

[11] TianD-lunThe functioning of chinese fir plantation ecosystem [M], 2005, Beijing, Science Press: 63-76

[12] TianD-l, YanW-d, FangX, KangW-x, DengX-w, WangG-jun. Influence of thinning on soil CO₂ efflux in Chinese fir plantations [J]. Pedosphere, 2009, 19(3): 273-280

[13] AlbanD H, PeralaD A, SchlaegelB E. Biomass and nutrient distribution in aspen, pine, and spruce stands on the same soil type in minnesota [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1978, 8(3): 290-299

[14] TianD-l, YanW-d, ChenX-y, DengX-w, PengY-y, KangW-x, PengC-hui. Variation in runoff with age of Chinese fir plantations in Central South China [J]. Hydrological Processes, 2008, 22(25): 4870-4876

[15] LiuG-songSoil physical and chemical analysis and description of soil profiles [M], 1996, Beijing, Standards Press of China: 87-96

[16] AllenC D, SavageM, FalkD A, SucklingK F, SwetnamT W, SchulkeT, StaceyP B, MorganP, HoffmanM, KlingelJ T. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: A broad perspective [J]. Ecological Applications, 2002, 12(5): 1418-1433

[17] AllenJ. Soil response to forest clearing in the United States and in the tropics: Geological and biological factors [J]. Biotropica, 1985, 17(1): 15-27

[18] ZhengH, ChenF-l, OuyangZ-y, TuN-m, XuW-h, WangX-k, MiaoH, LiX-q, TianY-xin. Impacts of reforestation approaches on runoff control in the hilly red soil region of Southern China [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 356(1): 174-184

[19] ClaytonJ L, KennedyD A, NagelT. Soil response to acidic deposition, Wind River Mountains, Wyoming: II. Column leaching studies [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1991, 55(5): 1433-1439

[20] RomanJ M, ShadO, CathyL C, KeithA E. Twentieth century thinning of mendenhall glacier, alaska, and its relationship to climate, lake calving, and glacier run-off [J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2003, 35(1): 93-112

[21] SmitG N, RethmanN F G. The influence of tree thinning on the soil water in a semi-arid savanna of southern africa [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2000, 44(1): 41-59

[22] CramD S, BakerT T, FernaldA G, MadridA, RummerB. Mechanical thinning impacts on runoff, infiltration, and sediment yield following fuel reduction treatments in a southwestern dry mixed conifer forest [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 62(5): 359-366

[23] LiuY-g, ZengX-x, XuL, TianD-l, ZengG-m, HuX-j, TangY-fang. Impacts of land-use change on ecosystem service value in Changsha, China [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(2): 420-428

[24] HeZ-b, LiaoT, LiuY-g, XiaoY, LiT-t, WangHui. Influence of sulfur addition/solids content ratio on removal of heavy metals from mine tailings by bioleaching [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(12): 3540-3545

[25] GaoY-x, LiuL-g, ShuJ-m, CaoH-fa. Acidic deposition-canopy interaction model [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 1992, 12(3): 316-324

[26] CappellatoR, PetersN E. Dry deposition and canopy leaching rates in deciduous and coniferous forests of Georgia Piedmont: An assessment of regression model [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1995, 169(1): 131-150

[27] StanisL M, AleksanderA. Throughfall chemistry in a spruce chronosequence in southern poland [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 155(3): 517-527

[28] PolkowskaZ, AstelA, WalnaB, MalekS, MeK, GóreckiT, SiepakJ, NamiernikJ. Chemometric analysis of rain water and throughfall at several sites in Poland [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(5): 837-855

[29] CěburnisD, SteinnesE. Conifer needles as biomonitors of atmospheric heavy metal deposition: Comparison with mosses and precipitation, role of the canopy [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2000, 34(25): 4265-4271

[30] Mahmoodi-KaleibarM, JavanshirI, AsadiK, AfkarA, PaykaniA. Optimization of suspension system of off-road vehicle for vehicle performance improvement [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(4): 902-910

[31] FanH-b, MaZ, LiangY-chi. Chemical properties of open and intercepted precipitation in Chinese fir plantation in Nanping, China [J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 1996, 16(2): 101-104

[32] HouB-f, WeiHong. Estimation of dry deposition and canopy exchange in Chinese fir plantions [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 147(2): 99-107

[33] AbdallahF, NoumiZ, Ouled-BelgacemA, MichaletR, TouzardB, ChaiebM. The influence of Acacia tortilis (Forssk.) ssp. raddiana (Savi) Brenan presence, grazing, and water availability along the growing season, on the understory herbaceous vegetation in southern tunisia [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2012, 76: 105-114

[34] WuL-f, LiS-m, LiuJ-h, YuMei. SCC evaluation of ultra-high strength steel in acidic chloride solution [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(10): 2726-2732

[35] UlrichBHutchinsonT C, HavasH. The production and consumption of hydrogen ions in the ecosphere [C]. Effects of Acid Precipitation on Terrestrial Ecosystem, 1980, New York, Plenum Press: 255-282

[36] ParfittR L, SmartR S C. The mechanism of sulfate adsorption on iron oxides [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1978, 42(1): 48-50

[37] JohnsonD W, ToddD E. Relationships among iron, aluminum, carbon, and sulfate in a variety of forest soils [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1983, 47(4): 792-800

[38] ZhangG-y, ZhangX-n, YuT-ren. Adsorption of sulfate and fluoride by variable charge soils [J]. Journal of Soil Science, 1987, 38(1): 29-38

[39] ZhuangS-y, WangM-k, KingH-b, HwongJ L, HsuF S. Rain acid buffer capacities of alpine forest soils in central taiwan [J]. Geoderma, 2006, 137(1): 174-178