Numerical and theoretical verification of modified cam-clay model and discussion on its problems

Abstract

Isotropic consolidation test and consolidated-undrained triaxial test were first undertaken to obtain the parameters of the modified cam-clay (MCC) model and the behavior of natural clayey soil. Then, for the first time, numerical simulation of the two tests was performed by three-dimensional finite element method (FEM) using ABAQUS program. The consolidated-drained triaxial test was also simulated by FEM and compared with theoretical results of MCC model. Especially, the behaviors of MCC model during unloading and reloading were analyzed in detail by FEM. The analysis and comparison indicate that the MCC model is able to accurately describe many features of the mechanical behavior of the soil in isotropic consolidation test and consolidated-drained triaxial test. And the MCC model can well describe the variation of excess pore water pressure with the development of axial strain in consolidated-undrained triaxial test, but its ability to predict the relationship between axial strain and shear stress is relatively poor. The comparison also shows that FEM solutions of the MCC model are basically identical to the theoretical ones. In addition, Mandel-Cryer effect unable to be discovered by the conventional triaxial test in laboratories was disclosed by FEM. The analysis of unloading-reloading by FEM demonstrates that the MCC model disobeys the law of energy conservation under the cyclic loading condition if the elastic shear modulus is linearly pressure-dependent.

Keywords

modified cam-clay (MCC) model / isotropic consolidation test / consolidated-undrained triaxial test / consolidated-drained triaxial test / Mandel-Cryer effect / energy conversation

References

[1] RoscoeK H, SchofieldA N, WrothC P. On yielding of soils [J]. Geotechnique, 1958, 8(1): 22-53

[2] RoscoeK H, SchofieldA N, ThurairajahA. Yielding of clays in states wetter than critical [J]. Geoteehnique, 1963, 13(3): 211-240

[3] RoscoeK H, BurlandJ B. On the generalized stress-strain behavior of ‘wet’ clay [M]. Engineering Plasticity, 1968CambridgeCambridge University Press535-609

[4] SchofieldA N, WrothC PCritical state soil mechanics [M], 1968LondonMcGraw-Hill93-143

[5] AmerasingheS F, KraftL M. Application of a Cam-clay model to overconsolidated clay [J]. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech, 1983, 7(2): 173-186

[6] MitaK A, DasariG R, LoK W. Performance of a three-dimensional Hvorslev-modified Cam clay model for overconsolidated clay [J]. Int J Geomech, 2004, 4(4): 296-309

[7] NakaiT, HinokioM A. Simple elastoplastic model for normally and over consolidated soils with unified material parameters [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2004, 44(2): 53-70

[8] XuL-m, QiD-q, GaoY-kai. Study on characteristics of over-consolidated soils with modified cam clay model [J]. J Shuili Xuebao, 2008, 39(3): 313-317

[9] HelwanySApplied soil mechanics with ABAQUS applications [M], 2007New YorkWiley98-105

[10] LuP-y, HanL-j, YuYon. Finite element analysis of temperature stress in strut of foundation pit [J]. Rock and soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(5): 1290-1294

[11] ChaiJ C, CarterJ P. Simulation of the progressive failure of an embankment on soft soil [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(6): 1024-1038

[12] ShahuJ T, ReddyY R. Clayey soil reinforced with stone column group: Model tests and analyses [J]. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2011, 137(10): 1265-1274

[13] HuangM-s, LiuY-h, ShengD-chao. Simulation of yielding and stress-stain behavior of shanghai soft clay [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(3): 341-353

[14] YinZ-y, KarstunenM, WangJ-h, YuChuang. Influence of features of natural soft clay on behaviour of embankment [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(5): 1667-1676

[15] SuebsukJ, HorpibulsukS, LiuM D. Modified structured cam clay: A generalised critical state model for destructured, naturally structured and artificially structured clays [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(7/8): 956-968

[16] ParryR H, NadarajahV. A volumetric yield locus for lightly overconsolidated clay [J]. Geotechnique, 1973, 23(3): 450-453

[17] TavenasF, LeroueilS. Effects of stresses and time on yielding of clays [C]. Proc of 9th ICSMFE, 1977319-326

[18] WrothC P, HoulsbyG T. Soil mechanics-property characterization and analysis procedures [C]. Proc of 11th Int Conf SMFE, San Francisco, 19851-55

[19] PottsD M, ZdravkovićLFinite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: Theory [M], 1999LondonThomas Telford Ltd172-173

[20] ZytynskiM, RandolphM K, NovaR, WrothC P. On modeling the unloading-reloading behaviour of soils [J]. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech, 1978, 2: 87-93

[21] VermeerP A, VerruijtA. Accuracy condition for consolidation by finite elements [J]. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech, 1981, 5(1): 1-14

[22] MandelJ. Consolidation de sols (Etude Mathematique) [J]. Geotechnique, 1953, 3: 287-299

[23] CryerC W. A comparison of the three-dimensional consolidation theories of Biot and Terzaghi [J]. Q J Mech Appl Math, 1963, 16: 401-412

[24] YinJ-h, ZhuJ-gao. Measured and predicted time-dependent stress-strain behaviour of Hong Kong marine deposits [J]. Can Geotech J, 1999, 36: 760-766