Numerical model of soft ground improvement by vertical drain combined with vacuum preloading

Abstract

The rapid development of high-speed transportation infrastructure such as highway and high-speed railway has resulted in the advancement of soft soil improvement techniques. Vacuum preloading combined with vertical drains has been proved to be an effective method in the treatment of soft foundation. A three-dimensional numerical analysis of the coupled methods was presented, in which the smear zone and the well resistance were taken into account. The variations of the basic soil parameters including the permeability coefficient and the coefficient of volume compressibility were considered in the numerical model. The result of the numerical model was then compared to the measured value. The results indicate that the decrease of coefficient of volume compressibility accelerates the consolidation of the soil while the influence of hydraulic conductivity is insignificant. A cube drain presents the closest result to the real situation compared to the other equivalent methods of prefabricated vertical drain (PVD). The case study indicates that the numerical model with variation of soil parameters is closer to the measured value than the numerical model without variation of soil parameters.

Keywords

vacuum preloading / prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) / parameter variation / numerical model

References

[1] ShangJ Q, TangM, MiaoZ. Vacuum preloading consolidation of reclaimed land: A case study [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35: 740-749

[2] ChuJ, YanS W, YangH. Soil improvement by the vacuum preloading method for an oil storage station [J]. Geotechnique, 2000, 50(6): 625-632

[3] ChenP-s, DongZ-l, ZhangG-xin. Field experiment study on strengthening soft foundation in Guangzhou Nansha port area by vacuum preloading [J]. China Harbour Engineering, 2009, 6: 45-49

[4] IndraratnaB, RujikiatkamjornC, KellyR, BuysH. Sustainable soil improvement via vacuum preloading [C]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. London, 201031-42

[5] IndraratnaB, RujikiatkamjornC, AmeratungaJ, BoyleP. Performance and prediction of vacuum combined surcharge consolidation at port of Brisbane [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137(11): 1009-1018

[6] CaoN, PengJ, PengR-h, ZhuC-fu. Improving highway foundation by means of vacuum surcharge preloading: Observation and numerical analysis of surface settlement [J]. Journal of East China Shipbuilding Institute: Natural Sciences, 2001, 15(2): 81-85

[7] ZhuP, YanS-w, LiuR, SunH-yue. Case study on improving soft foundation of embankment with vacuum preloading [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(4): 508-510

[8] YanS-w, ChenHuan. Mechanism and calculation methods of vacuum stabilization of soft clay [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1986, 8(2): 35-44

[9] ChaiJ C, MiuraN. Investigation of factors affecting vertical drain behavior [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 1999, 125(3): 216-226

[10] IndraratnaB, RujikiatkamjornC, SathananthanL. Analytical and numerical solutions for a single vertical drain including the effects of vacuum preloading [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42: 994-1014

[11] RujikiatkamjornC, IndraratnaB, ChuJ. 2D and 3D numerical modeling of combined surcharge and vacuum preloading with vertical drains [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2008, 8(2): 144-156

[12] ChenP-s, FangY-g, MoH-h, ZhangG-x, DongZ-liang. Analysis of 3D FEM for soft foundation improvement by vacuum preloading [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(4): 564-570

[13] DongZ-l, ChenP-s, MoH-h, ZhangG-xin. Effects of permeability coefficient on consolidation of soft clay under by vacuum preloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 1452-1456

[14] WuH, HuL-ming. Analytical and numerical solutions for vacuum preloading considering a radius related distribution [J]. Mechanics Research Communications, 2012, 44: 9-14

[15] HuL-m, WuW-l, WuHui. Numerical model of electro-osmotic consolidation in clay [J]. Geotechnique, 2012, 62(6): 537-541

[16] BarronR A. Consolidation of fine-grained soils by drain wells [J]. ASCE Transactions, 1948, 113: 718-754

[17] HuL-m, WuW-l, WuHui. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of electroosmosis consolidation for soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(12): 3977-3983

[18] WuW-lingTheoretical model and numerical simulation of electro-osmotic consolidation on soft clay [D], 2009BeijingTsinghua University

[19] RittirongA, ShangJ Q. Numerical analysis for electro-osmotic consolidation in two-dimensional electric field [C]. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Vancouver, Canada, 2008566-572

[20] HoltzR D, JamiolkowskiM B, LancellottaR, PedroniR. Behavior of bent prefabricated vertical drains [C]. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, 1988, 3: 1657-1660

[21] BergadoD T, AndersonL R, MiuraN, BalasubramaniamA SSoft ground improvement in lowland and other environments [M], 1996New YorkASCE Press427

[22] HansboS. Consolidation of clay by band shaped prefabricated drains [J]. Ground Engineering, 1979, 12(5): 16-25

[23] RixnerJ J, KraemerS R, SmithA DPrefabricated vertical drains [R]. Vol. I, Engineering Guidelines, FWHA/RD-86/168, 1986Washington, DCFederal Highway Administration