Attitude controller for reentry vehicles using state-dependent Riccati equation method

Dao-cheng Xie , Zhong-wei Wang , Wei-hua Zhang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (7) : 1861 -1867.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (7) : 1861 -1867. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1684-7
Article

Attitude controller for reentry vehicles using state-dependent Riccati equation method

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To get better tracking performance of attitude command over the reentry phase of vehicles, the use of state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE) method for attitude controller design of reentry vehicles was investigated. Guidance commands are generated based on optimal guidance law. SDRE control method employs factorization of the nonlinear dynamics into a state vector and state dependent matrix valued function. State-dependent coefficients are derived based on reentry motion equations in pitch and yaw channels. Unlike constant weighting matrix Q, elements of Q are set as the functions of state error so as to get satisfactory feedback and eliminate state error rapidly, then formulation of SDRE is realized. Riccati equation is solved real-timely with Schur algorithm. State feedback control law u(x) is derived with linear quadratic regulator (LQR) method. Simulation results show that SDRE controller steadily tracks attitude command, and impact point error of reentry vehicle is acceptable. Compared with PID controller, tracking performance of attitude command using SDRE controller is better with smaller control surface deflection. The attitude tracking error with SDRE controller is within 5°, and the control deflection is within 30°.

Keywords

reentry vehicle / attitude controller / nonlinear control / state-dependent Riccati equation / Schur algorithm / tracking performance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dao-cheng Xie, Zhong-wei Wang, Wei-hua Zhang. Attitude controller for reentry vehicles using state-dependent Riccati equation method. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(7): 1861-1867 DOI:10.1007/s11771-013-1684-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

KevinA W. A trade study on missile autopilot design using optimal control theory [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2007South Carolina, USAAIAA1-22

[2]

JamesR C, DonaldT S. Dynamic conversion of flight path angle commands to body attitude commands [C]. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 2002Anchorage, USAIEEE221-225

[3]

AntoniosT, BrainA W. Nonlinear flight control design for a STT missile [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2001Montreal, CanadaAIAA1-6

[4]

AntoniosT, BrainA W. Adaptive flight control design for nonlinear missiles [J]. Control Eng Pract, 2005, 13(1): 373-382

[5]

XinM, BalakrishnanS N. Nonlinear H∞ vehicle longitudinal autopilot design with Θ-D method [J]. IEEE Aero El Sys Mag, 2008, 44(1): 41-56

[6]

KevinP B, MichaelW O, DavidD D. Optimal guidance command generation and tracking for reusable launch vehicle reentry [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2006Colorado, USAAIAA1-23

[7]

CostaR R, ChuQ P, MudlerJ A. Reentry flight controller design using nonlinear dynamic inversion [J]. Journal of Spacecraft Rockets, 2003, 40(1): 64-71

[8]

PukdeboonC, ZinoberA. Optimal sliding mode controllers for attitude tracking of spacecraft [C]. Proceedings of 18th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2009Saint Petersburg, RussiaIEEE1708-1713

[9]

DongsooC, SeonhyeokK, KimH J, TahkM J. Adaptive dynamic surface control based on neural network for missile autopilot [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2011Portland, USAAIAA1-16

[10]

AntoniosT, RafalZ, BrainA W. Robust autopilot for a quasi-linear parameter-varying vehicle model [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2001, 24(2): 287-295

[11]

VaddiS S, MenonP K, OhlmeyerE J. Numerical SDRE approach for vehicle integrated guidance-control [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2007Hilton Head, USAAIAA1-17

[12]

PearsonJ D. Approximation methods in optimal control [J]. J Electron Control, 1962, 13(2): 453-465

[13]

JamesR C. State-dependent Riccati equation techniques: An overview [C]. Proceedings of American Control Conference, 1997Albuquerque, USAIEEE932-936

[14]

JamesR C, DonaldT S. Nonlinear, hybrid bank-to-turn skid-to-turn missile autopilot design [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2001Montreal, CanadaAIAA1-11

[15]

JamesR C, PeterH Z. Hypersonic guidance via the state-dependent Riccati equation control method [C]. Proceedings of 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 1999Hawaii, USAIEEE219-224

[16]

DonaldT S, JamesR C. Nonlinear control of satellite formation flight [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2000Denver, USAAIAA1-8

[17]

SunP, LiuKun. Vehicle autopilot design based on state dependent Riccati equation [C]. Proceedings of 2009 International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation, and Robotics, 2009Bangkok, ThailandIEEE134-138

[18]

RamaK Y, PraveenS, DavidB DCombining state dependent Riccati equation approach with dynamic inversion: Application to control of flight vehicles [R], 2003OhioAir Force Research Laboratory

[19]

AshwiniR, DebasishG. State-dependent Riccati equation based guidance law for impact-angle constrained trajectories [J]. J Guid Control Dynam, 2009, 32(1): 320-325

[20]

MenonP K, OhlmeyerE J. Integrated design of agile vehicle guidance and control system [C]. Proceedings of 7th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, 1999Haifa, IsraelMCCA1469-1494

[21]

BradleyA S, PanagiotisT. A State-dependent Riccati equation approach to atmospheric entry guidance [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2010Toronto, CanadaAIAA1-20

[22]

AndreaB, MarioI. A Newton algorithm for implementation of SDRE controllers [C]. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2005San Francisco, USAAIAA1-12

[23]

MenonP K, LamT, CrawfordL S. Real-time computational methods for SDRE nonlinear control of vehicles [C]. Proceedings of 2002 American Control Conference, 2002Anchorage, USAACC232-237

[24]

ZhaoH-yuanDynamics and guidance of reentry vehicles [M], 1997ChangshaPress of National University and Defense Technology89-98

[25]

ChenH-nianControl system design [M], 1996BeijingPress of Astronautics330-332

[26]

QianX-fangMissile dynamics [M], 2008BeijingPress of Beijing Institute of Technology36-48

[27]

HouM-z, DuanG R. Integrated guidance and control of homing missiles against ground fixed targets [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2008, 21(2): 162-168

[28]

HouM-zheIntegrated guidance and control for homing missiles [D], 2010HarbinHarbin Institute of Technology17-20

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

118

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/