Cracking process of rock mass models under uniaxial compression

Xin Chen , Zhi-hong Liao , Xi Peng

Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6) : 1661 -1678.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6) : 1661 -1678. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1660-2
Article

Cracking process of rock mass models under uniaxial compression

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Anisotropic strength and deformability of the rock mass with non-persistent joints are governed by cracking process of the rock bridges. The dependence of cracking process of jointed rock masses on the two important geometrical parameters, joint orientation and joint persistence, was studied systematically by carrying out a series of uniaxial compression tests on gypsum specimens with regularly arranged multiple parallel pre-existing joints. According to crack position, mechanism and temporal sequence, seven types of crack initiations and sixteen types of crack coalescences, were identified. It was observed that both tensile cracks and shear cracks can emanate from the pre-existing joints as well as the matrix. Vertical joints were included and coplanar tensile cracks initiation and coalescence were observed accordingly. For specimen with joint inclination angle β=75°, it was found that collinear joints can be linked not only by coplanar shear cracks but also by mixed tensile-shear cracks, and that a pair of them can form a small rotation block. Seven failure modes, including axial cleavage, crushing, crushing and rotation of new blocks, stepped failure, stepped failure and rotation of new blocks, shear failure along a single plane and shear failure along multiple planes, were observed. These modes shift gradually in accordance with the combined variation of joint orientation and joint persistence. It is concluded that cracking process and failure modes are more strongly affected by joint orientation than by joint persistence, especially when joint inclination angle is larger than 45°. Finally, variations of macroscopic mechanical behaviors with the two geometrical parameters, such as patterns of the complete axial stress-axial strain curves, peak strength and elastic modulus, are summarized and their mechanisms are successfully explained according to their different cracking process.

Keywords

rock mass / joint orientation / joint persistence / uniaxial compression / fracture process

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xin Chen, Zhi-hong Liao, Xi Peng. Cracking process of rock mass models under uniaxial compression. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(6): 1661-1678 DOI:10.1007/s11771-013-1660-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

LajtaiE Z. Strength of discontinuous rock in direct shear [J]. Geotechnique, 1963, 19(2): 218-233

[2]

KawamotoT, IchikawaY, KyoyaT. Deformation and fracturing behavior of discontinuous rock mass and damage mechanics theory [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1988, 12(1): 1-30

[3]

KulatilakeP H S W, WangS, StephanssonO. Effect of finite size joints on the deformability of jointed rock at the 3D level [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1993, 30(5): 479-501

[4]

KulatilakeP H S W, HeW, UmJ, WangH. A physical model study of jointed rock mass strength under uniaxial compressive loading [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(3/4): 165

[5]

OdaM. Fabric tensor for discontinuous geological materials [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1982, 22(4): 96-108

[6]

HoekE, BieniawskiZ T. Brittle fracture propagation in rock under compression [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1984, 26(4): 276-294

[7]

HoriiS, Nemat-NasserS. Brittle failure in compression: Splitting, faulting and brittle-ductile transition [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1986, 319: 337-374

[8]

LajtaiE Z. A theoretical and experimental evaluation of the Griffith theory of brittle fracture [J]. Tectonophysics, 1971, 11(2): 129-156

[9]

ShenB, StephanssonO, EinsteinH H, GhahremanB. Coalescence of fractures under shear stress experiments [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995, 100(6): 5975-5990

[10]

WongR H C, ChauKT. The coalescence of frictional cracks and the shear zone formation in brittle solids under compressive stresses [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(3/4): 366

[11]

SagongM, BobetA. Coalescence of multiple joints in a rock-model material in uniaxial compression [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(1): 229-241

[12]

WongL N Y, EinsteinH H. Systematic evaluation of cracking behavior in specimens containing single joints under uniaxial compression [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2009, 46(2): 239-249

[13]

WongL N Y, EinsteinH H. Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble: Part1-macroscopic observations and interpretation [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2009, 42(3): 475-511

[14]

LiL-y, CheF-x, LuJ-f, LiuD-an. Macro-mechanical properties of regular cracks body in rock-like materials under uniaxial compression [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2001, 233: 199-203

[15]

WongR H C, ChauK T. Crack coalescence in rock-like material containing two cracks [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1998, 35(2): 147-164

[16]

MughiedaO, KarasnehI. Coalescence of offset rock joints under biaxial loading [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(4): 985-999

[17]

GermanovichL N, CarterB J, IngraffeaA R, DyskinA V, LeeK K. Mechanics of 3-D crack growth under compressive loads [C]. Proceedings of the 2nd North American Rock Mechanics Symposium: NARMS’96, 1996MontrealASCE1151-1160

[18]

BobetA, EinsteinH H. Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1998, 35(7): 863-888

[19]

PrudencioM, JanM V S. Strength and failure modes of rock mass models with non-persistent joints [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(6): 890-902

[20]

LajtaiE Z. Shear strength of weakness planes in rock [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1969, 6(5): 499-515

[21]

WongR H C, ChauK T, TsoiP M. Pattern of coalescence of rock bridge between two joints under shear testing [C]. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, 1999ParisACSE735-738

[22]

GehleC, KutterH K. Breakage and shear behaviour of intermittent rock joints [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(5): 687-700

[23]

ParkC H, BobetA. Crack coalescence in specimens with open and closed joints: A comparison [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2009, 46: 819-829

[24]

JenningsJ E. A mathematical theory for the calculation of the stability of open cut mines [C]. Proceeding of Symposium on the Theoretical Background to the Planning of Opening Pit Mines, Johannesburg, 197087-102

[25]

EinsteinH H, BenezianoD, BaecherG B, O’ReillyK J. The effect of discontinuity persistence on rock slope stability [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1983, 20(5): 227-236

[26]

ChenX, LiaoZ-H, LiD-Jian. Experimental study on the effect of joint orientation and persistence on the strength and deformation properties of rock masses under uniaxial compression [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 304: 781-789

[27]

ChenX, LiaoZ-H, PengX. Experimental study on deformability characteristics of jointed rock masses under uniaxial compression [J]. Mining Science and Technology, 2012, 22(2): 213-221

[28]

BieniawskiZ T. Mechanism of brittle fracture of rock [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1967, 4(4): 395-435

[29]

JaegerJ C. Shear failure of anisotropic rocks [J]. Geology Magazine, 1960, 97(1): 65-72

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

102

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/