Method for optimizing manipulator’s geometrical parameters and selecting reducers

Abstract

A geometrical parameters optimization and reducers selection method was proposed for robotic manipulators design. The Lagrangian approach was employed in deriving the dynamic model of a two-DOF manipulator. The flexibility of links and joints was taken into account in the mechanical structure dimensions optimization and reducers selection, in which Timoshenko model was used to discretize the hollow links. Two criteria, i.e. maximization of fundamental frequency and minimization of self-mass/load ratio, were utilized to optimize the manipulators. The NSGA-II (fast elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithms) was employed to solve the multi-objective optimization problem. How the joints flexibility affects the manipulators design was analyzed and shown in the numerical analysis example. The results indicate that simultaneous consideration of the joints and the links flexibility is very necessary for manipulators optimal design. Finally, several optimal combinations were provided. The effectiveness of the optimization method was proved by comparing with ADAMS simulation results. The self-mass/load ratio error of the two methods is within 10%. The maximum error of the natural frequency by the two methods is 23.74%. The method proposed in this work provides a fast and effective pathway for manipulator design and reducers selection.

Keywords

robotic manipulator / optimal design / reducer selection / flexible links / flexible joints

References

[1] WangF-yue. On the extremal fundamental frequencies of one-link flexible manipulators [J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1994, 13(2): 162-170

[2] WangF-y, RussellJ L. Optimum shape construction of flexible manipulators with total weight constraint [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1995, 25(4): 605-614

[3] EverettL J, TangJ, CompereM. Designing flexible manipulators with the lowest natural frequency nearly independent of position [J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1999, 15(4): 605-611

[4] DixitU, KumarR, DwivedyS. Shape optimization of flexible robotic manipulators [J]. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006, 128(3): 559-565

[5] LouY-j, GongW, LiZ-x, ZhangJ-j, YangG-lin. Natural frequency based optimal design of a two-link flexible manipulator [C]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009New YorkIEEE1768-1773

[6] SpongM W. Modeling and control of elastic joint robots [J]. Journal of Dynamics Systems, Measures, Control, 1987, 109(4): 310-318

[7] Al-BedoorB, AlmusallamA. Dynamics of flexible-link and flexible-joint manipulator carrying a payload with rotary inertia [J]. Mechanical Machine Theory, 2000, 35(6): 785-820

[8] PetterssonM, OlvanderJ. Drive train optimization for industrial robots [J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2009, 25(6): 1419-1424

[9] RoosF, JohanssonH, WikanderJ. Optimal selection of motor and gearhead in mechatronic applications [J]. Mechatronics, 2006, 16(1): 63-72

[10] GibertiH, CinquemaniS, LegnaniG. Effects of transmission mechanical characteristics on the choice of a motor-reducer [J]. Mechatronics, 2010, 20(5): 604-610

[11] ZhouL L, BaiS P, HansenM R. Design optimization on the drive train of a light-weight robotic arm [J]. Mechatronics, 2011, 21(3): 560-569

[12] TangH-p, TangC-c, YinC-feng. Optimization of actuator/sensor position of multi-body system with quick startup and brake [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2007, 14(6): 803-807

[13] HanS M, BenaroyaH, WeiT. Dynamics of transversely vibrating beams using four engineering theories [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1999, 225(5): 935-988

[14] HutchinsonJ. Shear coefficients for timoshenko beam theory [J]. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2001, 68(1): 87-92

[15] FriedmanZ, KosmatkJ B. An improved two-node timoshenko beam finite element [J]. Computers & Structures, 1993, 47(3): 473-481

[16] HadjigeorgiouE, StavroulakisG, MassalasC. Shape control and damage identification of beams using piezoelectric actuation and genetic optimization [J]. International Journal of Engineering Science, 2006, 44(7): 409-421

[17] SrinivasN, DebK. Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 1995, 2(3): 221-248

[18] DebK, AgrawalS, PratapA, MeyarivanT. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: Nsga-ii [C]. Proceeding of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, 2000New YorkIEEE849-858