Effect of solution conditions on depression of chlorite using CMC as depressant

Abstract

The effect of solution conditions on the depression of chlorite using CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose) as depressant was studied through flotation tests and adsorption measurements. Flotation and adsorption tests were first studied as a function of initial solution conditions. The results show that electrostatic repulsion between CMC molecules and chlorite surface hinders the approach of the CMC molecules to the chlorite surface and CMC adsorbs to a great extent at high ionic concentration (10⁻⁴) mol/L ions as opposed to 0 mol/L ions) or low pH (3 as opposed to 9). The enhanced adsorption density is attributed to the decreased electrostatic repulsion between CMC and mineral surface. The solution condition that yielded the lowest initial adsorbed amount (0 mol/L ions, pH 9) was used as a reference to investigate the response of the adsorbed CMC layer to a switch in solution conditions after adsorption. The two kinds of solution switches (reducing the solution pH or increasing ionic concentration) result in an increased depression effect of CMC on chlorite flotation, as a result of conformational change of CMC pre-adsorbed layer. The change in the flotation recovery of the CMC-coated chlorite following the solution switches is reversible.

Keywords

chlorite / carboxymethyl cellulose / ion / pH / conformational change

References

[1] FornasieroD, RalstonJ. Cu(II) and Ni(II) activation in the flotation of quartz, serpentine and chlorite [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2005, 76(1/2): 75-81

[2] ZhangX-p, DaiH-xin. Research on magnesium reduction of a nickel ore beneficiation [J]. Yunnan Metallurgy, 2006, 35(3): 12-17

[3] ZhengG-s, LiuL-j, LiuJ-t, WangY-t, CaoY-jun. Study of chlorite flotation and its influencing factors [J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 2009, 1(1): 830-837

[4] SilvesterE J, BruckardandW J, WoodcockJ T. Surface and chemical properties of chlorite in relation to its flotation and depression [J]. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 2011, 120(2): 65-70

[5] JenkinsP, RalstonJ. The adsorption of a polysaccharide at the talc aqueous solution interface [J]. Colloids and Surfaces, 1998, 139(1): 27-40

[6] MackenzieJ, SalmanT. Guar based reagents [J]. Engineering and Mining Journal, 1980, 10: 80-87

[7] SteenbergE, HarrisP J. Adsorption of carboxymethyl cellulose, guar gum and starch onto talc, sulphides, oxides and salt type minerals [J]. South African Journal of Chemistry, 1984, 37: 85-90

[8] MorrisG E, FornasieroD, RalstonJ. Polymer depressants at the talc-water interface: Adsorption isotherm, microflotation and electrokinetic studies [J]. International Journal of Minerals Processing, 2002, 67: 211-227

[9] WangJ, SomasundarnP. Adsorption and conformation of carboxymethyl cellulose at solid-liquid interfaces using spectroscopic, AFM and allied techniques [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2005, 291(1): 75-83

[10] LiuQ, ZhangY, LaskowskiJ S. The adsorption of polysaccharides onto mineral surfaces and acid/base interaction [J]. International Journal of Minerals Processing, 2000, 60: 229-254

[11] BeaussartA, VasilevA M, BeattieD A. Evolution of carboxymethyl cellulose layer morphology on hydrophobic mineral surfaces: Variation of polymer concentration and ionic strength [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 346(2): 303-310

[12] BicakO, EkmekciZ, BradshawD J, HarrisP J. Adsorption of guar gum and CMC on pyrite [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2007, 20(10): 996-1002

[13] KhraashehM, HollandC, CreanyC, HarrisP, ParolisL. Effect of molecular weight and concentration on the adsorption of CMC onto talc at different ionic strengths [J]. International Journal of Minerals Processing, 2005, 75(3/4): 197-206

[14] YuX, SomasundaranP. Kinetics of polymer conformational changes and its role in flocculation [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1996, 178(2): 770-774

[15] DuboisM, GilesK A, HamiltonJ K, RebersP A, SmithF. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances [J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1956, 28(3): 350-356

[16] LinF, ClemencyC V. The dissolution kinetics of brucite, antigorite, talc and phlogopite at room temperature and pressure [J]. American Mineralogist, 1981, 66(7/8): 801-806

[17] SedevaG I, FornasieroD, RalstonJ, BeattieD A. Reduction of surface hydrophobicity using a stimulus-responsive polysaccharide [J]. Langmuir, 2010, 26(20): 15865-15874

[18] JenckelE, RumbachB. Adsorption of high polymers from solution [J]. Z. Electrochem, 1951, 55: 612-618

[19] MorrisG E. The adsorption characteristics of polymeric depressants at the tal-water interface [D]. University of South Australia, 1996

[20] ChandarP, SomasundaranP, TurroN J, WatermanK C. Excimer fluorescence determination of solid-liquid interfacial pyrene-labeled poly(acrylic acid) conformations [J]. Langmuir, 1987, 3: 298-300

[21] ScheutjensJ, FleerG J. Statistical theory of the adsorption of interacting chain molecules. 2: Train, loop, and tail size distribution [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1980, 84(2): 178-190