Morphological parameters of both surfaces of coupled joint

Xiang Fan , Ping Cao , Xue-jiao Huang , Yu Chen

Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 776 -785.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 776 -785. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1548-1
Article

Morphological parameters of both surfaces of coupled joint

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Twenty one joints were made with Brazilian tests and each surface was scanned by the Talysurf CLI 2000. Morphological characteristics of joint surface were quantified by statistical and textural parameters. By the contrast of these parameters between both sides of each coupled joint, the following conclusions are drawn. The upper and lower surfaces of coupled joints have approximately equal values of Sp(maximum height of joint surface), Sa(arithmetic mean height of joint surface) and Sq(root mean square height of joint surface), but the Ssk(skewness of the height distribution of joint surface) values of the two surfaces of a coupled joint are different, one is positive while the other is negative. The Sal(auto-correlation length) parameter values of both surfaces of each coupled joint are quite close, and the Str(texture aspect ratio) values have the same situation to the Sal parameter, but the same parameters of different surfaces have big differences which illustrates its own characteristics of each joint. The two surfaces of each coupled joint have similar values of

\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$\bar \theta _p $\end{document}
(mean profile angle) which can be used to deduce the value of
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$\bar \theta _p $\end{document}
each other.

Keywords

coupled joint / morphology / statistical parameter / textural parameter / profile mean angle / envelop area

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiang Fan, Ping Cao, Xue-jiao Huang, Yu Chen. Morphological parameters of both surfaces of coupled joint. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(3): 776-785 DOI:10.1007/s11771-013-1548-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

TatoneB S A, GrasselliG. A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlation with JRC [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(8): 1391-1400

[2]

JangB A, JangH S, ParkH J. A new method for determination of joint roughness coefficient [C]. Proceedings of the IAEG: Engineering Geology for Tomorrow’s Cities, 2006Nottingham, UKGeological Society of London1-9

[3]

XiaC-chu. A study on the surface morphological features of rock structure faces [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 1996, 4(3): 71-78

[4]

ZhaoJian. Joint surface matching and shear strength Part A: Joint matching coefficient [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(2): 173-178

[5]

ZhaoJian. Joint surface matching and shear strength Part B: JRC-JMC shear strength criterion [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(2): 179-185

[6]

BartonN, ChoubeyV. The shear strength of rock and rock joints in theory and practice [J]. Rock Mechanics, 1977, 10(1): 1-54

[7]

HomandF, BelemT, SouleyM. Friction and degradation of rock joint surfaces under shear loads [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2001, 25(10): 973-999

[8]

GrasselliG, EggerP. Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(1): 25-40

[9]

GrasselliG. Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2006, 39(4): 295-314

[10]

GrasselliG, WirthJ, EggerP. Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(6): 789-800

[11]

LeeH S, ParkY J, ChoT F, YouK H. Influence of asperity degradation on the mechanical behavior of rough rock joints under cyclic shear loading [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2001, 38(7): 967-980

[12]

JiangY-j, LiB, TanabashiY. Estimating the relation between surface roughness and mechanical properties of rock joints [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2006, 43(6): 837846

[13]

CaoP, FanX, PuC-z, ChenR, ZhouH, ZhengX-p, ZhangC-y, ZhangC-yang. Shear test of joint and analysis of morphology characteristic evolution of joint surface. [J], 2011, 30(3): 480-485

[14]

ChenY, CaoP, ChenR, TengYun. Effect of water-rock interaction on the morphology of a rock surface [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2010, 47: 816-822

[15]

BelemT, HomandF, SouleyM. Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2000, 33(4): 217-242

[16]

TseR, CrudenDm. Estimating joint roughness coefficients [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 1979, 16(5): 303-307

[17]

AndradeP S, SaraivaA A. Estimating the joint roughness coefficient of discontinuities found in metamorphic rocks [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2008, 67(8): 425-434

[18]

BeerA J, SteadD, CogganJ S. Estimation of the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) by visual comparison [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2002, 35(1): 65-74

[19]

DuS-g, HuY-j, HuX-fei. Measurement of joint roughness coefficient by using profilograph and roughness ruler [J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2009, 20(5): 890-896

[20]

YangZ Y, LoS C, DiC C. Reassessing the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation using Z2 [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2001, 34(3): 243-251

[21]

MandelbrotB B. The fractal geometry of nature [M]. San Francisco, USA: Freeman Company, 19836-80

[22]

CarrJ, WarrinerJb. Relationship between the fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficient [J]. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologist, 1989, 28(2): 253-263

[23]

OdlingNe. Natural fractal profiles, fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficients [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1994, 27(3): 135-153

[24]

KulatilakeP, ShouG, HuangT H, MorganR M. New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1995, 32(7): 673-679

[25]

XieH-p, WangJ-a, XieW-hong. Fractal effects of surface roughness on the mechanical behavior of rock joints [J]. Chaos, Solition & Fractals, 1997, 8(2): 221-252

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

99

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/