Influence of bluff body shape on wall pressure distribution in vortex flowmeter

Zhi-qiang Sun , Zhi-yong Li , Yun Jiang , Hong-liang Zhou

Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 724 -729.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 724 -729. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1540-9
Article

Influence of bluff body shape on wall pressure distribution in vortex flowmeter

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To investigate the influence of bluff body shape on wall pressure distribution in a vortex flowmeter, experiments were conducted on a specially designed test section in a closed water rig at Reynolds numbers of 6.2×104-9.3×104. The cross sections of the bluff bodies were semicircular, square, and triangular shaped, and there were totally 21 pressure tappings along the conduit to acquire the wall pressures. It is found that the variation trends of wall pressures are basically identical regardless of the bluff body shapes. The wall pressures begin to diverge from 0.3D (D is the inner diameter of the vortex flowmeter) in front of the bluff body due to the diversity in shape, and all reach the minimum values at 0.3D behind the bluff body. A discrepancy between the triangular or square cylinder and the semicircular cylinder in wall pressure change is observed at 0–0.1D behind the bluff body. It is also found that the wall pressures and irrecoverable pressure loss coefficients increase with flow rates, and the triangular cylinder causes the smallest irrecoverable pressure loss at a fixed flow rate.

Keywords

vortex flowmeter / bluff body shape / wall pressure / irrecoverable pressure loss

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhi-qiang Sun, Zhi-yong Li, Yun Jiang, Hong-liang Zhou. Influence of bluff body shape on wall pressure distribution in vortex flowmeter. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(3): 724-729 DOI:10.1007/s11771-013-1540-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

VenugopalA, AgrawalA, PrabhuS V. Review on vortex flowmeter: Designer perspective [J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2011, 170(1–2): 8-23

[2]

PankaninG L. The vortex flowmeter: various methods of investigating phenomena [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2005, 16(3): 1-16

[3]

HansV, PoppenG, von LavanteE, PerpeetS. Vortex shedding flowmeters and ultrasound detection: Signal processing and influence of bluff body geometry [J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1998, 9(2): 79-82

[4]

VenugopalA, AgrawalA, PrabhuS V. Influence of blockage and shape of a bluff body on the performance of vortex flowmeter with wall pressure measurement [J]. Measurement, 2011, 44(5): 954-964

[5]

PankaninG L. What is the role of the stagnation region in Karman vortex shedding [J]. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 2011, 18(3): 361-370

[6]

PengB H, MiauJ J, BaoF, WengL D, ChaoC C, HsuC C. Performance of vortex shedding from a circular cylinder with a slit normal to the stream [J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2012, 25: 54-62

[7]

SunZ-q, ZhouJ-m, ZhouPing. Application of Hilbert-Huang transform to denoising in vortex flowmeter [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2006, 13(5): 501-505

[8]

SunZ-q, ZhangH-jian. Application of empirical mode decomposition based energy ratio to vortex flowmeter state diagnosis [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2009, 16(1): 154-159

[9]

MiauJ J, LiuT W. Vortex flowmeter designed with wall pressure measurement [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1990, 61(10): 2676-2681

[10]

MiauJ J, ChiuE G, ChouJ H. A proposal of a ring-type vortex flowmeter [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1992, 63(9): 4213-4221

[11]

HansV, WindorferH. Comparison of pressure and ultrasound measurements in vortex flow meters [J]. Measurement, 2003, 33(2): 121-133

[12]

VenugopalA, AgrawalA, PrabhuS V. Influence of blockage and upstream disturbances on the performance of a vortex flowmeter with a trapezoidal bluff body [J]. Measurement, 2010, 43(4): 603-616

[13]

SunZ-q, ZhangH-j, ZhouJ-min. Investigation of the pressure probe properties as the sensor in the vortex flowmeter [J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2007, 136(2): 646-655

[14]

SunZ-qiang. Design and performance of the converging-diverging vortex flowmeter [J]. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 2011, 18(1): 129-136

[15]

ZhangH-j, HuangY-m, SunZ-qiang. A study of mass flow rate measurement based on the vortex shedding principle [J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2006, 17(1): 29-38

[16]

SunZ-q, ZhangH-jian. Neural networks approach for prediction of gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern based on frequency domain analysis of vortex flowmeter signals [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2008, 19(1): 015401

[17]

SunZ-q, ZhangH-jian. Measurement of the flow rate and volume void fraction of gas-liquid bubble flow using a vortex flow meter [J]. Chemical Engineering Communications, 2010, 197(2): 145-157

[18]

SunZ-qiang. Mass flow measurement of gas-liquid bubble flow with the combined use of a Venturi tube and a vortex flowmeter [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2010, 21(5): 055403

[19]

SunZ-q, ChenY-p, GongHui. Classification of gas-liquid flow patterns by the norm entropy of wavelet decomposed pressure fluctuations across a bluff body [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2012, 23(12): 125301

[20]

JiangZ-x, JiangC-t, LiuG-fangVortex flowmeter [M], 2006BeijingChina Petrochemical Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

90

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/