Comparison of two suspension control strategies for multi-axle heavy truck

Abstract

Two simple and effective control strategies for a multi-axle heavy truck, modified skyhook damping (MSD) control and proportional-integration-derivative (PID) control, were implemented into functional virtual prototype (FVP) model and compared in terms of road friendliness and ride comfort. A four-axle heavy truck-road coupling system model was established using FVP technology and validated through a ride comfort test. Then appropriate passive air suspensions were chosen to replace the rear tandem suspensions of the original truck model for preliminary optimization. The mechanical properties and time lag of dampers were taken into account in simulations of MSD and PID semi-active dampers implemented using MATLAB/Simulink. Through co-simulations with Adams and MATLAB, the effects of semi-active MSD and PID control were analyzed and compared, and control parameters which afforded the best comprehensive performance for each control strategy were chosen. Simulation results indicate that compared with the passive air suspension truck, semi-active MSD control improves both ride comfort and road-friendliness markedly, with optimization ratios of RMS vertical acceleration and RMS tyre force ranging from 10.1% to 44.8%. However, semi-active PID control only reduces vertical vibration of the driver’s seat by 11.1%, 11.1% and 10.9% on A, B and C level roads respectively. Both strategies are robust to the variation of road level.

Keywords

MSD control / PID control / heavy truck / suspension / ride comfort / road damage

References

[1] LuY. J., YangS. P., LiS. H.. Research on dynamics of a class of heavy vehicle-tire-road coupling system [J]. Science China-Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(8): 2054-2063

[2] MacdougallC., GreenM. F.. Fatigue damage of steel bridges due to dynamic vehicle loads [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2006, 11(3): 320-328

[3] FischerD., IsermannR.. Mechatronic semi-active and active vehicle suspensions [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2004, 12(11): 1353-1367

[4] KarnoppD., CrosbyM. J., FarwoodR. A.. Vibration control using semi-active force generators [J]. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1974, 96(2): 619-626

[5] ZengY. H., LiuS. J. E. J. Q.. Neuron PI control for semi-active suspension system of tracked vehicle [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(2): 444-450

[6] OzgurD., IlknurK., SabanC.. Modeling and control of a nonlinear half-vehicle suspension system: A hybrid fuzzy logic approach [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2012, 67(3): 2139-2151

[7] DongX. M., YuM., LiaoC. R., ChenW. M.. Comparative research on semi-active control strategies for magneto-rheological suspension [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2010, 59(3): 433-453

[8] CanaleM., MilaneseM., NovaraC.. Semi-active suspension control using ‘fast’ model-predictive techniques [J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14(6): 1034-1046

[9] SungK. G., ParkM. K.. Design and control of electronic control suspension using a magneto-rheological shock absorber [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I-Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2012, 226(13): 379-393

[10] ZapateiroM., PozoF., KarimiH. R., LuoN. S.. Semiactive control methodologies for suspension control with magnetorheological dampers [J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, 17(2): 370-380

[11] ChenW. W., ZhuM. F.. Delay-dependent H-2/H-infinity control for vehicle magneto-rheological semi-active suspension [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 24(6): 1028-1034

[12] ZarehS. H., SarrafanA., KhayyatA. A. A., ZabihollahA.. Intelligent semi-active vibration control of eleven degrees of freedom suspension system using magnetorheological dampers [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2012, 26(2): 323-334

[13] MeteredH., BonelloP., OyadijiS. O.. An investigation into the use of neural networks for the semi-active control of a magnetorheologically damped vehicle suspension [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2010, 224(D7): 829-848

[14] PengJ., HeJ., LiX. H., ChenY. K., CongY.. Simulation comparison and evaluation of common time domain models under road irregularity excitation [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 2009, 10(1): 77-82

[15] ZhaoY., LuS. F.. A vehicle’s time domain model with road input on four wheels [J]. Automotive Engineering, 1999, 21(2): 112-117

[16] GillespieT. D.Heavy truck ride [R], 1985WarrendaleSociety of Automotive Engineering

[17] PableM. J., SeshuP.. Design of ‘road friendly’ suspensions for quarter and half heavy goods vehicle models by using genetic algorithm and a multi-objective performance index [J]. International Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing, 2012, 7(1): 26-53

[18] NEWAY SAF-HOLLAND GROUP.Heavy-duty drive axle air ride suspensions for truck and tractor [R], 2006MuskegonSAF-HOLLAND USA

[19] YaoG. Z., YapF. F., ChenG., LiW. H., YeoS. H.. MR damper and its application for semi-active control of vehicle suspension system [J]. Mechatronics, 2002, 12(7): 963-973

[20] BesingerF. H.The performance of passive and semi-active suspensions for lorries [D], 1992CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge

[21] KitchingK. J., ColeD. J., CebonD.. Performance of a semi-active damper for heavy vehicles [J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2000, 122(3): 498-506

[22] ValášekM., KortümW., ŠikaZ., MagdolenL., VaculínO.. Development of semi-active road-friendly truck suspensions [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 1998, 6(6): 735-744

[23] IeluzziM., UrcoP., MontiglioM.. Development of a heavy truck semi-active suspension control [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2006, 14(3): 305-312

[24] ChenY. K., HeJ., GuoY., PengJ., GaoM. Q.. Optimization of heavy truck suspension system based on ride comfort and road friendliness [J]. Journal of Jiangsu University, 2009, 30(3): 251-255.^(in Chinese

[25] PedroJ. O., DahunsiO. A.. Neural network based feedback linearization control of a servo-hydraulic vehicle suspension system [J]. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science — Semantic Knowledge Engineering, 2011, 21(1): 137-147

[26] KarthikrajaA.. Stochastic algorithm for PID tuning of bus suspension system [C]. Symposium of 2009 International Conference on Control, Automation, Communication and Energy Conservation, 2009PerunduraiIEEE1-6

[27] AngK. H., ChongG., LiY.. PID control system analysis, design, and technology [J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems and Technology, 2005, 13(4): 559-576

[28] YerogluC., TanN.. Note on fractional-order proportional-integral-differential controller design [J]. IET Control Theory and Applications, 2011, 5(17): 1978-1989

[29] GaoY. J., HuangR., ZhangQ.. A comparison of three steering controllers for off-road vehicles [J]. Proceedings of the IMechE, Part D: Journal of Automobile, 2008, 222(D): 2321-2336

[30] GeorgiosT., CharlesW. S., EmanueleG.. Hybrid balance control of a magnetorheological truck suspension [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 317(3/4/5): 514-536