Measuring speed consistency for freeway diverge areas using factor analysis

Abstract

Although either absolute speed or speed difference can be considered as a measure for speed consistency, few researches consider both in practice. The factor analysis method was introduced to extract an optimal number of factors from numerous original measures. The freeway diverging zone was divided into four elements, namely the upstream, the diverge area, the downstream and the exit ramp. Operating speeds together with individual vehicle speeds were collected at each element with radar guns. Following the factor analysis procedure, two factors, which explain 96.722% of the variance in the original data, were retained from the initial seven speed measures. According to the loadings after Varimax rotation, the two factors are clearly classified into two categories. The first category is named “speed scale” reflecting the absolute speed, and the other one is named “speed dispersion” interpreting speed discreteness. Then, the weighted score of speed consistency for each diverge area is given in terms of linear combination of the two retained factors. To facilitate the level classification of speed consistency, the weighted scores are normalized in the range of (0, 1.0). The criterion for speed consistency classification is given as 0≤F_N<0.30, good consistency; 0.30≤F_N<0.60, fair consistency; 0.60≤F_N≤1.00, poor consistency. The validation by comparing with previously developed measures shows that the proposed measure is acceptable in evaluating speed consistency.

Keywords

safety / freeway / speed consistency / factor analysis

References

[1] ElvikR., ChristensenP., AmundsenA.Speed and road accidents-An evaluation of the power model [M], 2004OsloInstitute of Transport Economics

[2] MonsereC., BosaP., BertiniL.. Combining climate, crash, and highway data for improved ranking of speed and winter-weather related crash locations in Oregon [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2008, 134(7): 287-296

[3] A policy on geometric design of highways and streets (5th Edition) [M]. Washington D C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2004.

[4] PolusA., CarolineM. H.. New consistency model for rural highways and its relationship to safety [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2004, 130(3): 286-293

[5] GibreelG. M., EasaS., HassanM. Y., El-DimeeryI. A.. State of the art of highway geometric design consistency [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1999, 125(2): 305-313

[6] AliA.. Effective safety factors on horizontal curves of two-lane highways [J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2010, 10(2): 2814-2822

[7] IvetteC., EricT. D.. Factors affecting driver speed choice along two-lane rural highway transition zones [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2010, 136(8): 755-764

[8] ZhangY., LiZ., LiuP., ZhaL.. Exploring contributing factors to crash injury severity at freeway diverge areas using ordered probit model [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 21: 178-185

[9] Abdek-AtyM., DilmoreJ., DhindsaA.. Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2006, 38(2): 335-345

[10] ChenH., LiuP., LuJ., BehzadiB.. Evaluating the safety impacts of the number and arrangement of lanes on freeway exit ramps [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2009, 41(3): 543-551

[11] LeischJ. E., LeischJ. P.New concept in design speed applications as a control in achieving consistent highway design [R], 1977Washington D CTransportation Research Board of the National Academies4-14

[12] LammR., GuentherA. K., ChoueiriE. M.Safety module for highway geometric design [R], 1995Washington D CTransportation Research Board, National Research Council.7-15

[13] FitzpatrickK., KrammesR. A., FambroD. B.. Design speed, operating speed, and posted speed relationships [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1997, 67(2): 52-59

[14] McfaddenJ., ElefteriadouL.Evaluating horizontal alignment design consistency of two-lane rural highways: development of new procedure [R], 2000Washington D CTransportation Research Board, National Research Council.9-17

[15] MisaghiP.Modeling operating speed and speed differential for design consistency evaluation [D], 2003Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University

[16] GarberN. J., GadirajuR.Factors affecting speed variance and its influence on accidents [R], 1989Washington D CTransportation Research Board, National Research Council.64-71

[17] ChenC., LinZ.. Multiple timescale analysis and factor analysis of energy ecological footprint growth in China 1953–2006 [J]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(5): 1666-1678

[18] OcalaM. E., OralE. L., ErdisE., VuralG.. Industry financial ratios-application of factor analysis in Turkish construction industry [J]. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(1): 385-392

[19] AlhijaF.Factor Analysis: an overview and some contemporary advances [M], 2010Third EditionIsraelTel Aviv162-170

[20] FieldA. P.Discovering statistics using SPSS [M], 2005(2nd edition)LondonSage