Finite element analysis on thermal upheaval buckling of submarine burial pipelines with initial imperfection

Abstract

In-service hydrocarbons must be transported at high temperature and high pressure to ease the flow and prevent the solidification of the wax fraction. The pipeline containing hot oil will expand longitudinally due to the rise in temperature. If such expansion is resisted, for example by frictional effects over a kilometer or so of pipeline, compressive axial stress will be built up in the pipe-wall. The compressive forces are often so large that they induce vertical buckling of buried pipelines, which can jeopardize the structural integrity of the pipeline. A typical initial imperfection named continuous support mode of submarine pipeline was studied. Based on this type of initial imperfection, the analytical solution of vertical thermal buckling was introduced and an elastic-plasticity finite element analysis (FEA) was developed. Both the analytical and the finite element methodology were applied to analyze a practice in Bohai Gulf, China. The analyzing results show that upheaval buckling is most likely to build up from the initial imperfection of the pipeline and the buckling temperature depends on the amplitude of initial imperfection. With the same amplitude of initial imperfection, the triggering temperature difference of upheaval buckling increases with covered depth of the pipeline, the soil strength and the friction between the pipeline and subsoil.

Keywords

submarine buried pipeline / thermal stress / upheaval buckling / finite element method

References

[1] MaltbyT. C., CalladineC. R.. An investigation into upheaval buckling of buried pipelines-II. Theory and analysis of experimental observations [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 1995, 37(9): 965-983

[2] TaylorN., TranV.. Experimental and theoretical studies in subsea pipeline buckling [J]. Marine Structures, 1996, 9(2): 211-257

[3] WangW.-g., LiuR., YanS.-w., XuYu.. Vertical upheaval buckling of submarine buried heated pipelines with initial imperfection [J]. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2011, 17(2): 138-145

[4] LiuR., WangW.-g., YanS.-w., WuX.-l.. Engineering measures for preventing upheaval buckling of buried submarine pipelines [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2012, 33(6): 781-796

[5] TaylorN., GanA. B.. Submarine pipeline buckling imperfection studies [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 1986, 4: 295-323

[6] EinsfeldR. A., MurrayD. W., Yoosef-GhodsiN.. Buckling analysis of high-temperature pressurized pipelines with soil-structure interaction [J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2003, 25(2): 164-169

[7] NEWSON T A, DELJOUI P. Finite element modelling of upheaval buckling of buried offshore pipelines in clayey soils [C]// Soil and Rock Behavior and Modeling-Proceedings of the Geo-Shanghai Conference. Shanghai, China, 2006, 351–358.

[8] VANDEN BERGHE J F V, CATHIE D, BALLARD J C. Pipeline uplift mechanisms using finite element analysis [C]// Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Osaka, Millpress, 2005: 1801–1804.

[9] HENDRIKS Max A N, HART T C, MARCEL P, FRISSEN CHANTAI M. Elasto-pIastic design and assessment of pipelines: 3D finite element modeling [C]// Proceedings of the ASCE Pipeline Division Specialty Congress-Pipeline Engineering and Construction, San Diego, CA, United States, 2004: 923–932.

[10] PasqualinoI. P., AlvesJ. L. D., BattistaR. C.. Failure simulation of a buried pipeline under thermal loading [C]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2001Riode Janeiro, BrazilOMAE291-297

[11] YounS.-kie.. Study of buckle propagation and its arrest on a beam on a nonlinear foundation using finite element method [J]. Computers & Structures, 1991, 39(3/4): 381-386

[12] VillarragaJ. A., RodríguezJ. F., MartínezC.. Buried pipe modeling with initial imperfections [J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2004, 126(5): 250-257

[13] HobbsR. E.. In-service buckling of heated pipelines [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering ASCE, 1984, 110(2): 175-189

[14] YangX. L., HuangF., WangJ. M.. Modified image analytical solutions for ground displacement using nonuniform convergence model [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(3): 859-865

[15] YangX. L., HuangF.. Collapse mechanism of shallow tunnel based on nonlinear Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(6): 686-691

[16] YangX. L.. Seismic passive pressures of earth structures by nonlinear optimization [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2011, 81(9): 1195-1202

[17] YangX. L., WangJ. M.. Ground movement prediction for tunnels using simplified procedure [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26(3): 462-471

[18] YangX. L., ZouJ. F.. Cavity expansion analysis with non-linear failure criterion [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 164(1): 41-49

[19] Offshore Standard DNV-OS-F101. Submarine Pipeline Systems [S]. Norway, 2000.

[20] LiuR., YanS.-w., SunG.-min.. Improvement of the method for marine pipeline upheaval analysis under thermal stress [J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2005, 38(2): 124-128