Thermal performance analysis of borehole size effect on geothermal heat exchanger

Abstract

Thermal performance was the most important factor in the development of borehole heat exchanger utilizing geothermal energy. The thermal performance was affected by many different design parameters, such as configuration type and borehole size of geothermal heat exchanger. These eventually determined the operation and cost efficiency of the geothermal heat exchanger system. The main purpose of this work was to assess the thermal performance of geothermal heat exchanger with variation of borehole sizes and numbers of U-tubes inside a borehole. For this, a thermal response test rig was established with line-source theory. The thermal response test was performed with in-line variable input heat source. Effective thermal conductivity and thermal resistance were obtained from the measured data. From the measurement, the effective thermal conductivity is found to have similar values for two-pair type (4 U-tubes) and three-pair type (6 U-tubes) borehole heat exchanger systems indicating similar heat transfer ability. Meanwhile, the thermal resistance shows lower value for the three-pair type compared to the two-pair type. Measured data based resistance have lower value compared to computed result from design programs. Overall comparison finds better thermal performance for the three-pair type, however, fluctuating temperature variation indicates complex flow behavior inside the borehole and requires further study on flow characteristics.

Keywords

large size borehole heat exchanger / thermal response test / effective thermal conductivity / thermal resistance / borehole

References

[1] ZengH., DiaoN., FangZ.. Heat transfer analysis of boreholes in vertical ground heat exchanger[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2003, 46(23): 4467-4481

[2] CuiP., YangH., FangZ.. Heat transfer analysis of ground heat exchangers with inclined boreholes [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2006, 26(11/12): 1169-1175

[3] YangW., ShiM., LuiG., ChenZ.. A two region simulation model of vertical U-tube ground heat exchanger and its experimental verification [J]. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(10): 2005-2012

[4] SharqawyM. H., MokheimerE. M., BadrH. M.. Effective pipe-to-borehole thermal resistance for vertical ground heat exchangers [J]. Geothermics, 2009, 38(2): 271-277

[5] OppeltT., RiehlI., GrossU.. Modelling of the borehole filling of double U-pipe heat exchangers [J]. Geothermics, 2010, 39(3): 270-276

[6] Eslami-NejadP., BernierM.. Heat transfer in double U-tube boreholes with two independent circuits [J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2011, 133(8): 082801

[7] Al-KhouryR., KolbelT., SchramedeiR.. Efficient numerical modeling of borehole heat exchangers [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2010, 36(10): 1301-1315

[8] LeeC. K., LamH. N.. Computer simulation of borehole ground heat exchangers for geothermal heat pump systems [J]. Renewable Energy, 2008, 33(6): 1286-1296

[9] CarliM. D., TononM., ZarrellaA., ZecchinR.. A computational capacity resistance model (CaRM) for vertical ground-coupled heat exchangers [J]. Renewable Energy, 2010, 35(7): 1537-1550

[10] ShangY., LiS., LiH.. Analysis of geo-temperature recovery under intermittent operation of ground-source heat pump [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2011, 43(4): 935-943

[11] GustafssonA. M., WesterlundL.. Heat extraction thermal response test in groundwater-filled borehole heat exchanger-Investigation of the borehole thermal resistance [J]. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(9): 2388-2394

[12] HELLSTROM G, SANNER B, GONKA T, MARTENSSON S, Experiences with the borehole heat exchanger software EED [C]// Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Energy Storage.

[13] HELLSTROM G, SANNER B, GONKA T, MARTENSSON S, Experiences with the borehole heat exchanger software EED [C]// Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Energy Storage. Megastock, Sapporo, 1997: 247–252

[14] CLAESSON J. PC design model for thermally interacting deep ground heat exchangers [R]. IEA Heat Pump Centre Report HPC-WR-8, 1991: 95–104

[15] LimK. B., LeeC. H., LeeS. H., SoungN. W.. An experimental study on the thermal performance measurement of vertical borehole heat exchanger (BHE) [J]. Journal of KSME, 2006, 30(8): 764-771

[16] SohnB. H.. Evaluation of ground effective thermal conductivity and borehole effective thermal resistance from simple line-source model [J]. Journal of SAREK, 2007, 19(7): 512-520

[17] LimK. B., LeeS. H., LeeC. H.. An experimental study on the thermal performance of ground heat exchanger [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2007, 31: 985-990

[18] JeongY. M., KooJ. M., HwangY. J., JangS. Y., LeeY. H., LeeD. H., LeeJ. K.. Measurement of ground thermal conductivity and characteristics of thermal diffusion by the ground heat exchanger [J]. Journal of SAREK, 2008, 20(11): 739-745

[19] LeeS. K., WooJ. S., KimD. K.. A study of determining initial time of line source model used in estimating the effective soil formation thermal conductivities [J]. Journal of Energy Engineering, 2008, 17(3): 167-174

[20] KONG H J, LIM H J, CHOI J H, SOHN B H. An experimental study on the effective of ground heat exchanger to the overall thermal conductivity [C]// Proceeding of the SAREX Conference, Yong-pyeong, 2009: 45–51.

[21] EklöfC., GehlinS.TED: A mobile equipment for thermal response test [D], 1996SwedenLuleå University of Technology

[22] MOGENSEN P. Fluid duct wall heat transfer in duct system heat storage [C]// Proceedings of International Conference on Subsurface Heat Storage in Theory and Practice, Stockholm, 1983: 652–657.

[23] EskilsonP.Thermal analysis of heat extraction boreholes [D], 1987SwedenUniversity of Lund

[24] LouisL., BenoitB.. A new contribution to the finite line-source model for geothermal boreholes [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2007, 39(2): 188-198