Characteristics of turbulent flow distribution in branch piping system

Abstract

Flow distribution in branch piping system is affected by flow characteristics and different geometric variations. Most of the flow distribution studies are performed with one-dimensional analysis to yield overall information only. However, detailed analysis is required to find effects of design parameters on the flow distribution. For this aspect, three-dimensional turbulent flow analysis was performed to assess turbulence model performance and effects of upstream pressure and branch pipe geometry. Three different turbulence models of standard k-ɛ model, realizable k-ɛ model and standard k-ω yield similar results, indicating small effects of turbulence models on flow characteristics analysis. Geometric variations include area ratio of main and branch pipes, branch pipe diameter, and connection shape of main and branch pipes. Among these parameters, area ratio and branch diameter and shape show strong effect on flow distribution due to high friction and minor loss. Uniform flow distribution is one of common requirements in the branch piping system and this can be achieved with rather high total loss design.

Keywords

flow distribution / pipe flow / branch pipe / turbulent flow

References

[1] YOO G J, BAE, Y S, CHOI H K. Analysis of resistance effect on core flow distribution [C]// Proceedings of the ICONE15. Nagoya, 2007: ICONE15-10130.

[2] YooG. J., JungJ. H.. Analysis of unsteady turbulent triple jet flow with temperature difference [J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2004, 41(9): 931-942

[3] GalpinJ., SimoneauJ. P.. Large eddy simulation of a thermal mixing tee in order to assess the thermal fatigue [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2011, 32: 539-545

[4] BajuraR. A.. A model for flow distribution in manifolds [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Power, 1971, 93: 7-12

[5] BajuraR. A., JonesE. H.Jr.. Flow distribution manifolds [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1976, 98: 654-666

[6] YeH., KimD., LeeK., ChaW.. Flow distribution in manifold using modified equal pressure method [J]. Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 2009, 21(3): 176-185

[7] PAN M, TANG Y, ZHOU W, LU L. Flow distribution among microchannels with asymmetrical manifolds [C]// IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation. Guangzhou, 2007: 193–197.

[8] ArgyropoulosP., ScottK., TaamaW. M.. Pressure drop modelling for liquid feed direct methanol fuel cells, Part I. Model development [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1999, 73: 217-227

[9] ArgyropoulosP., ScottK., TaamaW. M.. Pressure drop modelling for liquid feed direct methanol fuel cells, Part II. Model based parametric analysis [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1999, 73: 229-245

[10] ArgyropoulosP., ScottK., TaamaW. M.. Modeling flow distribution for internally manifolded direct methanol fuel cell stacks [J]. Chemical Engineering Technologies, 2000, 23: 985-995

[11] DupontJ., LegendreD.. Numerical simulation for two-phase flows in fuel cell minichannels [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2011, 8(4): 041008

[12] KohJ., SeoH., LeeC. G., YooY., LimH. C.. Pressure and flow distribution in internal gas manifolds of a fuel-cell stack [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2003, 115: 54-65

[13] MaharudrayyaS., JayantiS., DeshpandeA. P.. Flow distribution and pressure drop in parallel-channel configurations of planar fuel cells [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2005, 144: 94-106

[14] ChoJ., HaT., KimH., MinK., ParkJ., ChangI., LeeT.. Numerical analysis of the gas flow distribution characteristics in the anode flow channel of the molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) [J]. Journal of KSME-B, 2009, 33(11): 834-839

[15] ParkJ., BaeJ.. Parallel manifold effects on the heat and mass transfer characteristics of metal-supported solid oxide fuel cell stacks [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2011, 8(6): 061016

[16] BassiounyM. K., MartinH.. Flow distribution and pressure drop in plate heat exchangers-I. U-type arrangement [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1984, 39: 693-700

[17] BassiounyM. K., MartinH.. Flow distribution and pressure drop in plate heat exchangers-II. Z-type arrangement [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1984, 39: 701-704

[18] SongJ., SungN.. Development of a numerical flow model for the multi-cylinder engine intake system [J]. Journal of KSME-B, 1996, 20(6): 1921-1930

[19] KandaiahN., MatarO. K., LawrenceC., BurmesterS., BurnsI.. Effects of geometry, flow index, and temperature on flow splitting [J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2005, 26(7): 51-57

[20] HWANG D Y, YOO S S, LEE M S, HAN B Y, PARK H K. CFD analysis for a pulsatile flow around a body inside a bifurcated tee [C]// Proceedings of the Spring Korean Society of Computational Fluid Engineering. Jeju, Korea, 2009: 183–190. (in Korean)

[21] WangJ., GaoZ., GanG., WuD.. Analytical solution of flow coefficients for a uniformly distributed porous channel [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2001, 84: 1-6

[22] LuF., LuoY., YangS.. Analytical and experimental investigation of flow distribution in manifolds for heat exchangers [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2008, 202: 179-185

[23] ChandrakerD. K., MaheshwariN. K., SahaD., Venkat RajV.. Experimental and analytical investigations on core flow distribution and pressure distribution in the outlet header of a PHWR [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2002, 27: 11-24

[24] AmadorC., GavriilidisA., AngeliP.. Flow distribution in different microreactor scale-out geometries and the effect of manufacturing tolerances and channel blockage [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2004, 101: 379-390

[25] AlfieriF., TiwariM. K., ZinovikI., PoulikakosD., BrunschwilerT., MichelB.. 3D integrated water cooling of a composite multilayer stack of chips [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Heat Transfer, 2010, 132: 121402

[26] ChenC., JungS., YenS.. Flow distribution in the manifold of PEM fuel cell stack [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 173: 249-263

[27] SparrowE. M., TongJ., AbrahamJ. P.. A quasi-analytical method for fluid flow in a multi-inlet collection manifold [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2007, 129: 579-586

[28] ChenA., SparrowE. M.. Turbulence modeling for flow in a distribution manifold [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2009, 52: 1573-1581

[29] ChenA., SpparowE. M.. Effect of exit-port geometry on the performance of a flow distribution manifold [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29: 2689-2692

[30] SolovitzS. A., MainkaJ.. Manifold design for micro-channel cooling with uniform flow distribution [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133: 051103

[31] LebaekJ., AndreasenM. B., AndresenA. A., BangM., KaerS. K.. Particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics analysis of fuel cell manifold [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2010, 7: 031001

[32] LebaekJ., AndreasenM. B., AndresenA. A., BangM., KaerS. K.. Flow and pressure distribution in fuel cell manifolds [J]. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2010, 7: 061001

[33] ANSYS FLUENT 12User’s guide [M], 2009LebanonANSYS, Inc9-1-9-44

[34] PartankarS. V.Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow [M], 1980WashingtonHemisphere Pub. Co.113-134