Multimedia health risk assessment: A case study of scenario-uncertainty

Abstract

Assisted by framework of multimedia total exposure model for hazard waste sites (CalTOX), potential influences of scenario-uncertainty on multimedia health risk assessment (MHRA) and decision-making were quantitatively analyzed in a primary extent under the Chinese scenario case by deliberately varying the two key scenario-elements, namely conceptual exposure pathways combination and aim receptor cohorts choice. Results show that the independent change of one exposure pathway or receptor cohort could lead variation of MHRA results in the range of 3.6×10⁻⁶-1.4×10⁻⁵ or 6.7×10⁻⁶–2.3×10⁻⁵. And randomly simultaneous change of those two elements could lead variation of MHRA results at the range of 7.7×10⁻⁸-2.3×10⁻⁵. On the basis of the corresponding sensitivity analysis, pathways which made a valid contribution to the final modeling risk value occupied only 16.7% of all considered pathways. Afterwards, comparative analysis between influence of parameter-uncertainty and influence of scenario-uncertainty was made. In consideration of interrelationship among all types of uncertainties and financial reasonability during MHRA procedures, the integrated method how to optimize the entire procedures of MHRA was presented innovatively based on sensitivity analysis, scenario-discussion and nest Monte Carlo simulation or fuzzy mathematics.

Keywords

scenario-uncertainty / multimedia health risk assessment (MHRA) / comparative analysis / parameter-uncertainty

References

[1] LiZ.-w., HuangJ.-q., LiY.-yuan.. Assessment on soil fertility of Dongting Lake wetland area (China) based on GIS and fuzzy evaluation [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(5): 1465-1472

[2] SuzukiN., YasudaM., SakuralT.. Simulation of long-term environmental dynamics of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans using the dynamic multimedia environmental fate model and its implication to the time trend analysis of dioxins [J]. Chemosphere, 2000, 40(9/10/11): 969-976

[3] ZhangZ., HuangJ.-h., ZengG.-m., YuanX.-zhong.. Application of 3MRA model in the decision-making for comprehensive chrome residue treatment [J]. China Environmental Science, 2010, 30(1): 139-144

[4] MackayD.Multimedia environmental models: The fugacity approach [M], 20012edFL, USACRC Press1-270

[5] CohenY.Modeling of pollutant transport and accumulation in a multimedia environment [M], 1987New YorkPraeger Publishing Company

[6] WangY.-j., JiaD.-hong.. Uncertainty analysis of health risk assessment [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2003, 21(6): 66-69

[7] BabendreierJ. E., CastletonK. J.. Investigating uncertainty and sensitivity in integrated, multimedia environmental models: Tools for FRAMES-3MRA [J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2005, 20(8): 1043-1055

[8] LiJ. B., HuangG. H., ZengG. M.. An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 82(2): 173-188

[9] US EPA.Guidelines for exposure assessment [R], 1992Washington D COffice of Research and Development, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment

[10] CullenA. C., FreyH. C.Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment [M], 1999New YorkPlenum Press1-317

[11] LiangJ., XieG.-x., ZengG.-ming.. An integrated stochastic-fuzzy modeling approach for the risk assessment of groundwater pollution [J]. Journal of Hunan University: Natural Sciences, 2009, 36(6): 54-58

[12] ZengG. M., QinX. S., HeL.. A neural network predictive control system for paper mill wastewater treatment [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2003, 16(2): 121-129

[13] MaddalenaR. L., MckoneT. E., HsiehD. P. H.. Influential input classification in probabilistic multimedia models [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2001, 15(1): 1-17

[14] FayerweartherW. E., CollinsJ. J., SchnatterR.. Quantifying uncertainty in a risk assessment using uncertainty data [J]. Risk Analysis, 1999, 19(6): 1007-1090

[15] ZHU Hui-na, YUAN Xing-zhong, ZENG Guang-ming. An integrated fuzzy model based on interval numbers for assessment of environmental health risks of water sources [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 29(7): 1527–1533. (in Chinese)

[16] HertwichE. G., MckoneT. E., PeaseW. S.. A systematic uncertainty analysis of an evaluative fate and exposure model [J]. Risk Analysis, 2000, 20(4): 439-454

[17] MoshandreasD. J., KaruchitS.. Scenario-model-parameter: A new method of cumulative risk uncertainty analysis [J]. Environmental International, 2002, 28(4): 247-261

[18] US EPA.Exposure factors handbook [R], 1997Washington D COffice of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment

[19] MckoneT. E.CalTOX: A multimedia total-exposure model for hazardous waste sites: Part II. Multimedia transport and transformation model [R], 1993CaliforniaLawrence Livermore National Laboratory

[20] CaliforniaE. P. A.CalTOX: A multimedia total-exposure model for hazardous waste sites [R], 1993CaliforniaLawrence Livermore National Laboratory

[21] MckoneT. E.CalTOX: A multimedia total-exposure model for hazardous waste sites: Part I. Executive summary [R], 1993CaliforniaLawrence Livermore National Laboratory

[22] MckoneT. E.CalTOX: A multimedia total-exposure model for hazardous waste sites: Part III. Multipathway exposure model [R], 1993CaliforniaLawrence Livermore National Laboratory

[23] LinkovI., CariniF., CollinsC.. Radionuclides in fruit systems: Model-model intercomparison study [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 364(1/2/3): 124-137

[24] HuE.-bang.Practical techniques and methods for environmental risk assessment [M], 2000BeijingChina Environmental Science Press1-201

[25] ChenY. C., MaH. W.. Model comparison for risk assessment: A case study of contaminated groundwater [J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 63(5): 751-761

[26] ChenY. C., MaH. W.. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 141(1): 17-26

[27] LinkovI., BurmistrovD.. Model uncertainty and choices made by modelers: Lessons learned from the international atomic agency model intercomparisons [J]. Risk Analysis, 2003, 23(6): 1297-1308

[28] FinkelA. M.Confronting uncertainty in risk assessment: A guide for decision-makers [R], 1990Washington D CCenter for Risk Management Resources for the Future

[29] MorganM. G., HenrionM.Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis [M], 1990New YorkCambridge University Press16-307