Analytical modeling and multi-objective optimization (MOO) of slippage for wheeled mobile robot (WMR) in rough terrain

Abstract

Good understanding of relationship between parameters of vehicle, terrain and interaction at the interface is required to develop effective navigation and motion control algorithms for autonomous wheeled mobile robots (AWMR) in rough terrain. A model and analysis of relationship among wheel slippage (S), rotation angle (θ), sinkage (z) and wheel radius (r) are presented. It is found that wheel rotation angle, sinkage and radius have some influence on wheel slippage. A multi-objective optimization problem with slippage as utility function was formulated and solved in MATLAB. The results reveal the optimal values of wheel-terrain parameters required to achieve optimum slippage on dry sandy terrain. A method of slippage estimation for a five-wheeled mobile robot was presented through comparing the odometric measurements of the powered wheels with those of the fifth non-powered wheel. The experimental result shows that this method is feasible and can be used for online slippage estimation in a sandy terrain.

Keywords

autonomous wheeled mobile robot / terramechanics / traction / motion control / soil shear failure / drawbar pull

References

[1] FUKE Y, KROTKOV E. Dead reckoning for a lunar rover on uneven terrain [C]// Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1996: 411–416.

[2] ASAE-American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Uniform terminology for traction of agricultural tractors, self-propelled implements, and other traction and transport devices [M]. Agricultural Engineers Yearbook of Standards, 1983: 190–192.

[3] ANI O A, XU H, ZHAO G. Analysis and modelling of slip for a five-wheeled mobile robot (WMR) in an uneven terrain [C]// Proceedings of International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). Beijing, China, 2011: 154–159.

[4] YOSHIDA K, HAMANO H. Motion dynamics and control of a planetary rover with slip-based traction model [C]// Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology IV. 2002: 275–286.

[5] GustafssonF.. Slip-based tire-road friction estimation [J]. Automatica, 1997, 33: 1087-1099

[6] IagnemmaK., WardC. C.. Classification-based wheel slip detection and detector fusion for mobile robots on outdoor terrain [J]. Autonomous Robots, 2009, 26: 33-46

[7] LindgrenD. R., HagueT., SmithP. J. P., MarchantJ. A.. Relating torque and slip in an odometric model for an autonomous agricultural vehicle [J]. Autonomous Robots, 2002, 13: 73-86

[8] OjedaL., BorensteinJ.. Methods for the reduction of odometry errors in over-constrained mobile robots [J]. Autonomous Robots, 2004, 16: 273-286

[9] XU H, TAN D, ZHANG Z, XUE K, JIN B. A reconfigurable mobile robot with 5th wheel [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. Changchun, China, 2009: 211–216.

[10] XuH., ZhangZ., AlipourK., XueK., GaoX. Z.. Prototypes selection by multi-objective optimal design: Application to a reconfigurable robot in sandy terrain [J]. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2011, 38(6): 599-613

[11] SCHENKER P, HUNTSBERGER T, PIRJANIAN P. Rovers for intelligent, agile traverse of challenging terrain [C]// International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Coimbra, Portugal: NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2003: 203–208.

[12] SAITOH K, MACHIDA T, KIYOKAWA K, TAKEMURA H. A 2D-3D integrated interface for mobile robot control using omnidirectional images and 3D geometric models. [C]// IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). Montreal, Canada: i-SAIRAS, 2007: 173–176.

[13] IAGNEMMA K, SHIBLY H, RZEPNIEWSKI A, DUBOWSKY S. Planning and control algorithms for enhanced rough-terrain rover mobility [C]// Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space. i-SAIRAS. 2001.

[14] WongJ. Y.Theory of ground vehicles [M] Third Ed, 2001New YorkJohn Willey and Sons144-153

[15] THRUN S, BUECKEN A. Integrating grid-based and topological maps for mobile robot navigation [C]// Proceedings of 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Oregon, Poland, 1996: 944–950.

[16] BekkerM. G.Theory of land locomotion [EM/OL], 1956Ann Arbor, MIUniversity of Michigan Press

[17] BEKKER M G. Off-the-road locomotion [EM/OL]. University of Michigan Press, www.amazon.com > Books > Reference. 1960.

[18] REINA G. Methods for wheel slip and sinkage estimation in mobile robots [M]. Robot Localization and Map Building, 2006: 561–578.

[19] YOSHIDA K. Slip, traction control, and navigation of a lunar rover [C]// Proceeding of the 7th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space. Nara, Japan, 2003: 1–7.

[20] IAGNEMMA K, GOLDA D, DUBOWSKY S. Experimental study of high-speed rough-terrain mobile robot models for reactive behaviours [C]// Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics. Sant’ Angelo d’Ischia, Italy, 2002: 628–637.

[21] LindgrenD. R., HagueT., SmithP. J. P., MarchantJ. A.. Relating torque and slip in an odometric model for an autonomous agricultural vehicle [J]. Autonomous Robots, 2002, 13: 73-86

[22] JANOSI Z, HANAMOTO B. The analytical determination of drawbar pull as a function of slip for tracked vehicles in deformable soils [C]// Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Terrain-Vehicle Systems. Torino, 1961: 707–726.

[23] WongJ. Y.. Predicting the performances of rigid rover wheels on extraterrestrial surfaces based on test results obtained on earth [J]. J Terramechanics, 2012, 49(1): 49-61

[24] HemmatA., NankaliN., AghilinateghN.. Simulating stress-sinkage under a plate sinkage test using a viscoelastic 2D axisymmetric finite element soil model [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2012, 118: 107-116

[25] GustafssonF.. Slip-based tire-road friction estimation [J]. Automatica, 1997, 33: 1087-1099

[26] DingL., GaoH., DengZ., NagataniK., YoshidaK.. Experimental study and analysis on driving wheel’s performance for planetary exploration rovers moving in deformable soil [J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2011, 48: 27-45

[27] StroudK. A.Advanced engineering mathematics [M], 2003Fourth EditionHoundmillsPalgrave Macmillan940-948

[28] CHI-KEONG G, KAY C T. Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in uncertain environments [M]. KACPRZYK J, Ed. Springer, 2009: 1–39.

[29] ShiblyH., IagnemmaK., DubowskyS.. An equivalent soil mechanics formulation for rigid wheels in deformable terrain, with application to planetary exploration rovers [J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2005, 42: 1-13

[30] ZHANG Z. Kinematics and Estimation study on a rough terrain mobile robot [D]. Harbin Engineering University, 2011. (in Chinese)

[31] BekkerM. G.Theory of land locomotion [M], 1956Ann ArborUniversity of Michigan Press

[32] SreenivasanS., WaldronK.. Displacement analysis of an actively articulated wheeled vehicle configuration with extensions to motion planning on uneven surface [J]. J Mech Des, 1996, 118(2): 312-317