Low secondary compressibility and shear strength of Shanghai Clay

Qing Li , C. W. W. Ng , Guo-bin Liu

Journal of Central South University ›› 2012, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (8) : 2323 -2332.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2012, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (8) : 2323 -2332. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-012-1278-9
Article

Low secondary compressibility and shear strength of Shanghai Clay

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In order to investigate the compressibility, particularly the secondary compression behaviour, soil structure and undrained shear strength of Shanghai Clay, a series of one-dimensional consolidation tests (some up to 70 d) and undrained triaxial tests on high-quality intact and reconstituted soil specimens were carried out. Shanghai Clay is a lightly overconsolidated soil (OCR=1.2–1.3) with true cohesion or bonding. Due to the influence of soil structures, the secondary compression index Cα varies significantly with consolidation stress and the maximum value of Cα occurs in the vicinity of preconsolidation stress. Measured coefficients of secondary compression generally fall in the range of 0.2%–0.8% based on which Shanghai Clay can be classified as a soil with low to medium secondary compressibility. The effect of soil structures on the compressibility of Shanghai Clay is found to reduce with an increase in depth. Soil structure has an important influence on initial soil stiffness, but does not appear to affect undrained shear strength significantly. Undrained shear strengths of intact Shanghai Clay from compression tests are approximately 20% higher than those from extension tests.

Keywords

Shanghai Clay / block sampling / secondary compressibility / soil structure / undrained shear strength

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qing Li, C. W. W. Ng, Guo-bin Liu. Low secondary compressibility and shear strength of Shanghai Clay. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(8): 2323-2332 DOI:10.1007/s11771-012-1278-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

GAO Da-zhao, WEI Dao-duo, HU Zhong-xiong. Geotechnical properties of Shanghai soils and engineering applications [J]. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1986: 161–177.

[2]

XieN., SunJun.. Rheological behaviour of Shanghai clays [J]. Journal of Tongji University, 1996, 24(3): 233-237

[3]

GaoY.-b., ZhuH.-h., YeG.-b., XuChao.. The investigation of the coefficient of secondary compression Cα in oedometer tests [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, 26(4): 459-463

[4]

SunD.-a., ChenB., ZhouKe.. Experimental study of compression and shear deformation characteristics of remolded Shanghai soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 1389-1394

[5]

YuanJ.-y., YangX.-z., ZhaoX.-h., DongJ.-guo.. Experimental study on anisotropic characteristic of Shanghai soft clay [J]. Dam Observation and Geotechnical Tests, 1996, 20(2): 10-14

[6]

AtkinsonJ. H., CharlesJ. A., MhachH. K.. Examination of erosion resistance of clays in embankment dams [J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 1990, 23: 103-108

[7]

BSI.BS 5930: Code of Practice for Site Investigations [S], 1999LondonBritish Standard Institution

[8]

BurlandJ. B.. On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays [J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(3): 329-378

[9]

CHEN R. Expetimental study and constitutive modelling of stress-dependet coupled hydraulic hysteresis and mechanical behaviour of an unsaturated soil [D]. Department of Civl and Enviromental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2007.

[10]

LUNNE T, BERRE T, STRANDVIK S. Sample disturbance effects in soft low plastic Norwegian clay [C]// Proceedings of Symposium on Recent Developments in Soil and Pavement Mechanics. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1997: 81-102.

[11]

MesriG., RokhsarA., BohorB. F.. Composition and compressibility of typical samples of Mexico city clay [J]. Géotechnique, 1975, 25(3): 527-554

[12]

MesriG., GodlewskiP.. Time-and stress-compressibility interrelationship [J]. ASCE J Geotech Eng Div, 1977, 103(5): 417-430

[13]

MesriG.. Coefficient of secondary compression [J]. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div-v 99, 1973, 1: 123-137

[14]

Al-ShamraniM. A.. Application of the Cα/Cc concept to secondary compression of sabkha soils [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(1): 15-26

[15]

TerzaghiK., PeckR. B., MesriG.Soil mechanics in engineering practice [M], 1996New YorkJohn Wiley and Sons, Inc.43-44

[16]

MesriG.. Primary compression and secondary compression [J]. Geotechnical Special Publication, 2003, 119: 122-166

[17]

NashD. F. T., SillsG. C., DavisonL. R.. One-dimensional consolidation testing of soft clay from Bothkennar [J]. Géotechnique, 1992, 42(2): 241-256

[18]

NgC. W. W., LiQ., LiuG.-bin.. Characteristics of one-dimensional compressibility of Shanghai Clay [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(4): 630-636

[19]

LiuG. B., NgC. W. W., WangZ. W.. Observed performance of a deep multistrutted excavation in Shanghai soft clays [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(8): 1004-1013

[20]

LeeK. M., JiH. W., ShenC. K., LiuJ. H., BaiT. H.. Ground response to the construction of Shanghai Metro Tunnel-Line 2 [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1999, 39(3): 113-134

[21]

GasparreA., NishimuraS., CoopM. R., JardineR. J.. The influence of structure on the behaviour of London Clay [J]. Géotechnique, 2007, 57(1): 19-31

[22]

GasparreA., CoopM. R.. Quantification of the effects of structure on the compression of a stiff clay [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45(9): 1324-1334.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

96

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/