Lateral aerodynamic performance and speed limits of double-deck container vehicles with different structures

Abstract

Based on 3D, steady N-S equations and k-ɛ turbulence model, Fluent was employed to do numerical simulation for lateral aerodynamic performance of 6-axis X2K double-deck container trains with two different loading forms, and speed limits of the freight trains were studied. The result indicates that under wind environment: 1) As for vehicles without and with cross-loaded structure, aero-pressure on the former is bigger, but air velocity around the latter is larger; 2) When sideslip angle θ=0°, the airflow is symmetry about train vertical axis; when θ>0°, the airflow is detached at the top of vehicles, and the air velocity increases above the separated line but decreases below it; 3) With θ increasing, the lateral force on the mid vehicle firstly increases but decreases as θ=75°; 4) When the 6-axis X2K flat car loads empty boxes of a 40 ft and a 48 ft at 120 km/h, the overturning wind speed is 25.19 m/s, and the train should be stopped under the 12th grade wind speed.

Keywords

numerical simulation / 6-axis X2K flat car / loading form / lateral aerodynamic performance / speed limit

References

[1] LiuH.-y., YangA.-guo.. Dynamics performance simulation of double2deck container flat car [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(3): 20-24

[2] ALAM F, WATKINS S. Lateral stability of double stacked container wagon under crosswinds [C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering (ICME2007). Dhaka, 2007: 79–85.

[3] HemidaH., BakerC.. Large-eddy simulation of the flow around a freight wagon subjected to a crosswind [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2010, 39(10): 1944-1956

[4] FerreiraA., VazP.. Wind tunnel study of coal dust release from train wagons [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2004, 92(7/8): 565-577

[5] BettleJ., HollowayA., VenartJ.. A computational study of the aerodynamic forces acting on a tractor-trailer vehicle on a bridge in cross-wind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91(5): 573-592

[6] PassmoreM., RichardsonS., ImamA.. An experimental study of unsteady vehicle aerodynamics [J]. Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2001, 215(7): 779-788

[7] LiangX.-f., HuZ.-l., LiuT.-hong.. Analysis and comparison of aerodynamic performance of container flat wagon [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2008, 39(4): 781-786

[8] KhierW., BreuerM., DurstF.. Flow structure around trains under side wind conditions: A numerical study [J]. Computers & Fluids, 2000, 29(3): 179-195

[9] SuzukiM., TanemotoK., MaedaT.. Aerodynamic characteristics of train/vehicles under cross winds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91(1/2): 209-218

[10] GaoG.-j., TianH.-q., ZhangJian.. Cross-wind affection on double container train [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(2): 45-48

[11] WangF.-jun.Analysis of computational fluid dynamics [M], 2004BeijingTsinghua University Press7-12

[12] LiY.-f., LiangX.-feng.. Aerodynamic function and stability influence of high-speed moving EMUs on insulated boards [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2009, 40(6): 1587-1592

[13] FinnemoreE. J., FranziniJ. B.Fluid mechanics with engineering applications [M], 2002ColumbusMcGraw-Hill286-292

[14] LiY.-f., LiangX.-feng.. Comparison of aerodynamic performances between double container car and boxcar [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2009, 40(1): 169-174

[15] GaoG.-j., TianH.-q., YaoS., LiuT.-hong.. Effect of strong cross-wind on the stability of trains running on the Lanzhou-Xinjiang railway line [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2004, 26(4): 36-40