Microstructure and thermal conductivity of carbon/carbon composites made with different kinds of carbon fibers

Abstract

The microstructure and surface state of three kinds of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers (T700, T300 and M40) before and after high temperature treatment were investigated. Also, the pyrocarbon and thermal conductivity of carbon/carbon composites with different carbon fibers as preform were studied. The results show that M40 carbon fiber has the largest crystallite size and the least d₀₀₂, T300 follows, and T700 the third. With the increase of heat treatment temperature, the surface state and crystal size of carbon fibers change correspondingly. M40 carbon fiber exhibits the best graphitization property, followed by T300 and then T700. The different microstructure and surface state of different carbon fibers lead to the different microstructures of pyrocarbon and then result in the different thermal conductivities of carbon/carbon composites. The carbon/carbon composite with M40 as preform has the best microstructure in pyrocarbon and the highest thermal conductivity.

Keywords

carbon fiber / thermal conductivity / pyrocarbon

References

[1] BuckleyJ. D., EdieD. D.Carbon/carbon materials and composites [M], 1993New JerseyNoyes Publications1-17

[2] LuoR. Y.. Current status of research and application of C/C composites used for aeroplane brake and engine [J]. Carbon Techniques, 2001, 4: 27-29

[3] TorstenW., GordonB.. Carbon-carbon: A summary of recent developments and applications [J]. Materials & Design, 1997, 18: 11-15

[4] GaoX. Q., GuoQ. G., LiuL.. The study progress on carbon materials with high thermal conductivity [J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2006, 37: 173-177

[5] ChandS. J.. Carbon fibers for composites [J]. Mater Sci, 2000, 35: 1303-1013

[6] EdieD. D.. The effect of processing on the structure and properties of carbon fibers [J]. Carbon, 1998, 36: 345-362

[7] LiD. F., WangH. J., XueL. B.. Preferred orientation of PAN-based carbon fibers during continuous graphitization [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2006, 25: 1101-1109

[8] HunaY., YoungR.J.. Effect of fiber microstructure upon the modulus of PAN-and pitch-based carbon fibers [J]. Carbon, 1995, 33: 97-107

[9] DatyeK. V.. PAN fiber variants [J]. Synth Fibers, 1997, 10: 5-10

[10] YingY. X., WoX. Y.. Review of carbon fiber’s surface modification [J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2004, 25: 51-54

[11] LiuF. J., WangH. J., FanL. D.. The change of density under high temperature heat treatment in PAN-based carbon fibers [J]. New Chemical Materials, 2007, 35: 43-45

[12] SunW. C., LiH. J., HanH. M.. Microstructure of the pyrocarbon matrix prepared by CLVI process [J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 2004, 369: 245-249

[13] XiongJ., ZouZ. Q., TangZ. H.. Effect of carrier gas on the microstructure of CVI pyrocarbon in C/C composite [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2004, 21: 87-92

[14] XiongX., TangZ. H., ZhangH. B.. Effect of carrier gas on density and microstructure distribution of CVI-derived C/C composites [J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Matals, 2006, 16(3): 385-391

[15] GuanZ. D., ZhangZ. T., JiaoJ. S.Physical performances of inorganic materials [M], 1992BeijingTsinghua University Press131-150

[16] SavageG.Carbon carbon composites [M], 1993LondonChapman & Hall309-317

[17] ManochaL. M., WarrierA., ManochaS.. Thermophysical properties of densified pitch based carbon/carbon materials — I. Unidirectional composites [J]. Carbon, 2006, 44: 480-487