Pseudo-dynamic analysis of overturning stability of retaining wall

Abstract

A new method was presented to determine the safety factor of wall stability against overturning based on pseudo-dynamic approach. In this time-dependent method, the actual dynamic effect with variation of time and propagation of shear and primary wave velocities through the backfills was considered. Planar failure surface was considered behind the retaining wall. The results were compared with those obtained from Mononobe-Okabe theory. It is found that there is a higher value of safety factor by the present dynamic analysis. The effects of wall inclination, wall friction angle, soil friction angle and horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients on the overturning stability of retaining wall were investigated. The parametric study shows that both horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations have decreasing effect on the overturning stability of retaining wall.

Keywords

seismic active force / pseudo-dynamic method / earthquake / stability against overturning / retaining wall

References

[1] OkabeS.. General theory of earth pressure [J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 1926, 12(1): 1277-1323

[2] MONONOBE N, MATSUO H. On the determination of earth pressure during earthquake [C]// Proceeding of the World Engineering Congress. Tokyo, Japan, 1929: 274–280.

[3] KramerS. L.Geotechnical earthquake engineering [M], 1996, NJ, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs: 1-400

[4] RichardsR., HuangC., FishmanK. L.. Seismic earth pressure on retaining structures [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 1996, 125(9): 771-778

[5] SaranS., GuptaR. P.. Seismic earth pressures behind retaining walls [J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 33(3): 195-213

[6] ShuklaS. K., GuptaS. K., SivakuganN.. Active earth pressure on retaining wall for c-φ soil backfill under seismic loading condition [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2009, 135(5): 690-696

[7] CaltabianoS., CasconeE., MaugeriM.. Seismic stability of retaining walls with surcharge [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 20: 469-476

[8] SteedmanR. S., ZengX. T.. he influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall [J]. Geotechnique, 1990, 40(1): 103-112

[9] ZengX., SteedmanR. S.. On the behavior of quay walls in earthquakes [J]. Geotechnique, 1993, 43: 417-431

[10] ChoudhuryD., NimbalkarS.. Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Geotechnique, 2005, 55(9): 699-702

[11] GhoshP.. Seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 45(9): 117-123

[12] ChoudhuryD., NimbalkarS.. Seismic rotational displacement of gravity walls by pseudo-dynamic method: Passive case [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(3): 242-249

[13] NimbalkarS., ChoudhuryD.. Sliding stability and seismic design of retaining wall by pseudo-dynamic method for passive case [J]. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(6): 497-505

[14] DasB. M.Principles of soil dynamics [M], 1993, Boston, Massachusetts, PWS-KENT Publishing Company: 1-380

[15] PrakashS.Soil dynamics [M], 1981, USA, McGraw Hill, Inc: 1-450

[16] GB50007-2002.Specifications for foundation design of construction grounds [S], 2002, Beijing, China Architecture and Building Press