Critical crack tip opening displacement of different strength concrete

Abstract

Critical crack tip opening displacement (CTODc) of concrete using experimental and analytical evaluation with seven different compressive strengths ranging from 30 up to 150 MPa was studied based on two types of fracture tests: three-point bending (TPB) and wedge splitting (WS). In the tests, the values of CTODc were experimentally recorded using a novel technique, in which fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors were used, and two traditional techniques, in which strain gauges and clip gauges were deployed. The values of CTODc of tested concrete were also predicted using two existing analytical formulae proposed by JENQ & SHAH and XU, respectively. It is found that the values of CTODc obtained by both experimental measurements and analytical formulae exhibit a negligible variation as the compressive strength of concrete increases, and the test geometry adopted has little impact on the value of CTODc. Regarding the experimental measurement of CTODc, the clip gauge method generally leads to a larger value of CTODc and shows a more significant scatter as compared with the other two methods, while the strain gauge method leads to a slightly lower CTODc as compared with the FBG sensor method. The analytical formula proposed by JENQ and SHAH is found to generally lead to an overestimation, while the analytical formula proposed by XU shows a good accuracy.

Keywords

critical crack tip opening displacement (CTOD_c) / fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors / three-point bending (TPB) tests / wedge splitting (WS) tests / high strength / concrete

References

[1] JenqY. S., ShahS. P.. A fracture-toughness criterion for concrete [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 21(5): 1055-1069

[2] ZhouF. P., BarrB. I. G., LydonF. D.. Fracture properties of high-strength concrete with varying silica fume content and aggregates [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1995, 25(3): 543-552

[3] XiaoJ. Z., SchneiderH., DönneckeC., KönigG.. Wedge splitting test on fracture behaviour of ultra high strength concrete [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2004, 18(6): 359-365

[4] LinC., JinX.-y., LiZ.-jin.. Experimental study on some factors affecting fracture property of concrete [J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2004, 5: 7-9

[5] BarrB. I. G., AbusiafH. F., SenerS.. Size effect and fracture energy studies using compact compression specimens [J]. Materials and Structures, 1998, 31(205): 36-41

[6] NavalurkarR. K., HsuC. T. T., KimS. K., WecharatanaM.. True fracture energy of concrete [J]. ACI Materials Journal, 1999, 96(2): 213-225

[7] ZhaoZ.-f., XuS.-lang.. Influence of compressive strength of concrete upon new K_R-curve based on the cohesive force [J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2001, 74: 11-21

[8] AnsariF.. Stress-strain response of microcracked concrete in direct tension [J]. ACI Materials Journal, 1987, 84(6): 481-490

[9] AnsariF.. Mechanism of microcrack formation in concrete [J]. ACI Materials Journal, 1989, 86(5): 459-464

[10] XuS.-l., ReinhardtH. W.. Determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle fracture, Part I: Experimental investigation of crack propagation [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1999, 98(2): 111-149

[11] RobinsP., AustinS., ChandlerJ., JonesP.. Flexural strain and crack width measurement of steel-fibre-reinforced concrete by optical grid and electrical gauge methods [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001, 31(5): 719-729

[12] AnsariF., NavalurkarR.. Kinetics of crack formation in cementitious composites by fiber optics [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanic, 1993, 119(5): 1048-1061

[13] CHEN X, ANSARI F, DING H. Embedded fiber optic displacement sensor for concrete elements [C]// Proceedings of Engineering Mechanics. Fort Lauderdale: FL1-2, ACSE-EMD Special Publish, 1996: 359–365.

[14] LeeI., LiboY., AnsariF., DingH.. Fiber optics crack tip opening displacement sensor for concrete [J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1997, 19(1): 59-68

[15] YuanL., AnsariF.. Embedded white light interferometer fibre optics strain sensor for monitoring crack-tip opening in concrete beams [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 1998, 9: 261-266

[16] LeungC. K. Y., ElvinN., OlsonN., MorseT. F., HeY. F.. A novel distributed optical crack sensor for concrete structures [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 65(2/3): 133-148

[17] LiQ. B., LiG., WangG. L., YuanL. B.. CTOD measurement for cracks in concrete by fiber optic sensors [J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2004, 42(4): 377-388

[18] ZhangZ. J., AnsariF.. Crack tip opening displacement in micro-cracked concrete by an embedded optical fiber sensor [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2005, 72(16): 2505-2518

[19] JenqY. S., ShahS. P.. Two parameter fracture model for concrete [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1985, 111(10): 1227-1241

[20] XuS.-lang.Fracture mechanisms of concrete [D], 1988, Dalian, Dalian University of Technology

[21] MajumderM., GangopadhyayT. K., ChakrabortyA. K., DasguptaK., BhattacharyaD. K.. Fibre Bragg gratings in structural health monitoring-Present status and applications [J]. Sensors and Actuators A, 2008, 147: 150-164

[22] DT/T 5332-2005. Norm for fracture test of hydraulic concrete [S].